The majority of trust research has focused on the benefits trust can have for individual actors, institutions, and organizations. This “optimistic bias” is particularly evident in work focused on institutional trust, where concepts such as procedural justice, shared values, and moral responsibility have gained prominence. But trust in institutions may not be exclusively good. We reveal implications for the “dark side” of institutional trust by reviewing relevant theories and empirical research that can contribute to a more holistic understanding. We frame our discussion by suggesting there may be a “Goldilocks principle” of institutional trust, where trust that is too low (typically the focus) or too high (not usually considered by trust researchers) may be problematic. The chapter focuses on the issue of too-high trust and processes through which such too-high trust might emerge. Specifically, excessive trust might result from external, internal, and intersecting external-internal processes. External processes refer to the actions institutions take that affect public trust, while internal processes refer to intrapersonal factors affecting a trustor’s level of trust. We describe how the beneficial psychological and behavioral outcomes of trust can be mitigated or circumvented through these processes and highlight the implications of a “darkest” side of trust when they intersect. We draw upon research on organizations and legal, governmental, and political systems to demonstrate the dark side of trust in different contexts. The conclusion outlines directions for future research and encourages researchers to consider the ethical nuances of studying how to increase institutional trust.
existence of objects from which no direct information can be obtained
experimentally or observationally. A well known example is to
ascertain the existence of black holes of various masses in different
parts of the universe from indirect evidence, such as X-ray emissions.
In the field of complex networks, the problem of detecting
hidden nodes can be stated, as follows. Consider a network whose
topology is completely unknown but whose nodes consist of two types:
one accessible and another inaccessible from the outside world. The
accessible nodes can be observed or monitored, and it is assumed that time
series are available from each node in this group. The inaccessible
nodes are shielded from the outside and they are essentially
``hidden.'' The question is, based solely on the
available time series from the accessible nodes, can the existence and
locations of the hidden nodes be inferred? A completely data-driven,
compressive-sensing based method is developed to address this issue by utilizing
complex weighted networks of nonlinear oscillators, evolutionary game
and geospatial networks.
Both microbes and multicellular organisms actively regulate their cell
fate determination to cope with changing environments or to ensure
proper development. Here, the synthetic biology approaches are used to
engineer bistable gene networks to demonstrate that stochastic and
permanent cell fate determination can be achieved through initializing
gene regulatory networks (GRNs) at the boundary between dynamic
attractors. This is experimentally realized by linking a synthetic GRN
to a natural output of galactose metabolism regulation in yeast.
Combining mathematical modeling and flow cytometry, the
engineered systems are shown to be bistable and that inherent gene expression
stochasticity does not induce spontaneous state transitioning at
steady state. By interfacing rationally designed synthetic
GRNs with background gene regulation mechanisms, this work
investigates intricate properties of networks that illuminate possible
regulatory mechanisms for cell differentiation and development that
can be initiated from points of instability.