Matching Items (2)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

136361-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Determining the characteristics of an object during a grasping task requires a combination of mechanoreceptors in the muscles and fingertips. The width of a person's finger aperture during the grasp may affect the accuracy of how that person determines hardness, as well. These experiments aim to investigate how an individual

Determining the characteristics of an object during a grasping task requires a combination of mechanoreceptors in the muscles and fingertips. The width of a person's finger aperture during the grasp may affect the accuracy of how that person determines hardness, as well. These experiments aim to investigate how an individual perceives hardness amongst a gradient of varying hardness levels. The trend in the responses is assumed to follow a general psychometric function. This will provide information about subjects' abilities to differentiate between two largely different objects, and their tendencies towards guess-chances upon the presentation of two similar objects. After obtaining this data, it is then important to additionally test varying finger apertures in an object-grasping task. This will allow an insight into the effect of aperture on the obtained psychometric function, thus ultimately providing information about tactile and haptic feedback for further application in neuroprosthetic devices. Three separate experiments were performed in order to test the effect of finger aperture on object hardness differentiation. The first experiment tested a one-finger pressing motion among a hardness gradient of ballistic gelatin cubes. Subjects were asked to compare the hardness of one cube to another, which produced the S-curve that accurately portrayed the psychometric function. The second experiment utilized the Phantom haptic device in a similar setup, using the precision grip grasping motion, instead. This showed a more linear curve; the percentage reported harder increased as the hardness of the second presented cube increased, which was attributed to both the experimental setup limitations and the scale of the general hardness gradient. The third experiment then progressed to test the effect of three finger apertures in the same experimental setup. By providing three separate testing scenarios in the precision grip task, the experiment demonstrated that the level of finger aperture has no significant effect on an individual's ability to perceive hardness.
ContributorsMaestas, Gabrielle Elise (Author) / Helms Tillery, Stephen (Thesis director) / Tanner, Justin (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / Harrington Bioengineering Program (Contributor)
Created2015-05
154148-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) were first imagined as a technology that would allow subjects to have direct communication with prosthetics and external devices (e.g. control over a computer cursor or robotic arm movement). Operation of these devices was not automatic, and subjects needed calibration and training in order to master this

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) were first imagined as a technology that would allow subjects to have direct communication with prosthetics and external devices (e.g. control over a computer cursor or robotic arm movement). Operation of these devices was not automatic, and subjects needed calibration and training in order to master this control. In short, learning became a key component in controlling these systems. As a result, BMIs have become ideal tools to probe and explore brain activity, since they allow the isolation of neural inputs and systematic altering of the relationships between the neural signals and output. I have used BMIs to explore the process of brain adaptability in a motor-like task. To this end, I trained non-human primates to control a 3D cursor and adapt to two different perturbations: a visuomotor rotation, uniform across the neural ensemble, and a decorrelation task, which non-uniformly altered the relationship between the activity of particular neurons in an ensemble and movement output. I measured individual and population level changes in the neural ensemble as subjects honed their skills over the span of several days. I found some similarities in the adaptation process elicited by these two tasks. On one hand, individual neurons displayed tuning changes across the entire ensemble after task adaptation: most neurons displayed transient changes in their preferred directions, and most neuron pairs showed changes in their cross-correlations during the learning process. On the other hand, I also measured population level adaptation in the neural ensemble: the underlying neural manifolds that control these neural signals also had dynamic changes during adaptation. I have found that the neural circuits seem to apply an exploratory strategy when adapting to new tasks. Our results suggest that information and trajectories in the neural space increase after initially introducing the perturbations, and before the subject settles into workable solutions. These results provide new insights into both the underlying population level processes in motor learning, and the changes in neural coding which are necessary for subjects to learn to control neuroprosthetics. Understanding of these mechanisms can help us create better control algorithms, and design training paradigms that will take advantage of these processes.
ContributorsArmenta Salas, Michelle (Author) / Helms Tillery, Stephen I (Thesis advisor) / Si, Jennie (Committee member) / Buneo, Christopher (Committee member) / Santello, Marco (Committee member) / Kleim, Jeffrey (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015