Matching Items (5)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

151016-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Human recreation on rangelands may negatively impact wildlife populations. Among those activities, off-road vehicle (ORV) recreation carries the potential for broad ecological consequences. A study was undertaken to assess the impacts of ORV on rodents in Arizona Uplands Sonoran Desert. Between the months of February and September 2010, rodents were

Human recreation on rangelands may negatively impact wildlife populations. Among those activities, off-road vehicle (ORV) recreation carries the potential for broad ecological consequences. A study was undertaken to assess the impacts of ORV on rodents in Arizona Uplands Sonoran Desert. Between the months of February and September 2010, rodents were trapped at 6 ORV and 6 non-ORV sites in Tonto National Forest, AZ. I hypothesized that rodent abundance and species richness are negatively affected by ORV use. Rodent abundances were estimated using capture-mark-recapture methodology. Species richness was not correlated with ORV use. Although abundance of Peromyscus eremicus and Neotoma albigula declined as ORV use increased, abundance of Dipodomys merriami increased. Abundance of Chaetodipus baileyi was not correlated with ORV use. Other factors measured were percent ground cover, percent shrub cover, and species-specific shrub cover percentages. Total shrub cover, Opuntia spp., and Parkinsonia microphylla each decreased as ORV use increased. Results suggest that ORV use negatively affects rodent habitats in Arizona Uplands Sonoran Desert, leading to declining abundance in some species. Management strategies should mitigate ORV related habitat destruction to protect vulnerable populations.
ContributorsReid, John Simon (Author) / Brady, Ward (Thesis advisor) / Miller, William (Committee member) / Bateman, Heather (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
Desert ecosystems are one of the fastest urbanizing areas on the planet. This rapid shift has the potential to alter the abundances and species richness of herbivore and plant communities. Herbivores, for example, are expected to be more abundant in urban desert remnant parks located within cities due to anthropogenic

Desert ecosystems are one of the fastest urbanizing areas on the planet. This rapid shift has the potential to alter the abundances and species richness of herbivore and plant communities. Herbivores, for example, are expected to be more abundant in urban desert remnant parks located within cities due to anthropogenic activities that concentrate food resources and reduce native predator populations. Despite this assumption, previous research conducted around Phoenix has shown that top-down herbivory led to equally reduced plant biomass. It is unclear if this insignificant difference in herbivory at rural and urban sites is due to unaltered desert herbivore populations or altered activity levels that counteract abundance differences. Vertebrate herbivore populations were surveyed at four sites inside and four sites outside of the core of Phoenix during fall 2014 and spring 2015 in order to determine whether abundances and richness differ significantly between urban and rural sites. In order to survey species composition and abundance at these sites, 100 Sherman traps and 8 larger wire traps that are designed to attract and capture small vertebrates such as mice, rats, and squirrels, were set at each site for two consecutive trap nights. Results suggest that the commonly assumed effect of urbanization on herbivore abundances does not apply to small rodent herbivore populations in a desert city, as overall small rodent abundances were statistically similar regardless of location. Though a significant difference was not found for species richness, a significant difference between small rodent genera richness at these sites was observed.
ContributorsAlvarez Guevara, Jessica Noemi (Co-author) / Ball, Becky A. (Co-author, Thesis director) / Hall, Sharon J. (Co-author) / Bateman, Heather (Committee member) / School of Sustainability (Contributor) / School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-05
136299-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Water is the main driver of net primary productivity (NPP) in arid ecosystems, followed by nitrogen and phosphorous. Precipitation is the primary factor in determining water availability to plants, but other factors such as surface rocks could also have an impact. Surface rocks may positively affect water availability by preventing

Water is the main driver of net primary productivity (NPP) in arid ecosystems, followed by nitrogen and phosphorous. Precipitation is the primary factor in determining water availability to plants, but other factors such as surface rocks could also have an impact. Surface rocks may positively affect water availability by preventing evaporation from soil, but at higher densities, surface rocks may also have a negative impact on water availability by limiting water infiltration or light availability. However, the direct relationship between rock cover and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), a proxy for NPP, is not well understood. In this research we explore the relationship between rock cover, ANPP, and soil nutrient availability. We conducted a rock cover survey on long-term fertilized plots at fifteen sites in the Sonoran Desert and used 4 years of data from annual plant biomass surveys to determine the relationship between peak plant biomass and surface rock cover. We performed factorial ANCOVA to assess the relationship among annual plant biomass, surface rocks, precipitation, and fertilization treatment. Overall we found that precipitation, nutrients, and rock cover influence growth of Sonoran Desert annual plants. Rock cover had an overall negative relationship with annual plant biomass, but did not show a consistent pattern of significance over four years of study and with varying average winter precipitation.
ContributorsShaw, Julea Anne (Author) / Hall, Sharon (Thesis director) / Sala, Osvaldo (Committee member) / Cook, Elizabeth (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2015-05
163999-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In the Spring of 2021, I had an internship with Butterfly Wonderland, where I worked in their conservatory and learned about the ecological relationship between butterflies and plants. As part of my internship, I encouraged guests to learn more about gardening for pollinators. That experience inspired me to complete a

In the Spring of 2021, I had an internship with Butterfly Wonderland, where I worked in their conservatory and learned about the ecological relationship between butterflies and plants. As part of my internship, I encouraged guests to learn more about gardening for pollinators. That experience inspired me to complete a creative project in which I would design a butterfly garden of my own that would highlight wildlife benefits and be accessible to people like myself, who do not have their own gardens and don’t have hundreds of dollars to spend on gardening supplies. In collaboration with Dr. Gwen Iacona and Liz Makings (director and second committee member respectively), I planted accessible gardens. By “accessible”, I mean that the gardens were affordable (less than $100 total), included free/upcycled materials wherever possible, and are easily replicable. For my project, I made ‘prototypes’ of the gardens by using freely available seeds and soil sources, germinating those seeds in the ASU Greenhouses, and documenting my process so that it could be shared. Freely available seeds and other materials came from a variety of places including the ASU seed library, local Free Little Libraries, donations, as well as purchases from on campus fundraisers. The germination and growth of seeds in the ASU greenhouse took place over the course of several months in the fall and winter. That documentation has taken on several forms, including an informational pamphlet about wildlife gardening and flyers specific to locally available plant seeds. I find this to be very important because my end goal was to create something that other students or people in our community can use in a practical way. I wanted to create something that will bring gardening into the homes of people who didn’t think they were able to participate in it.
ContributorsBernat, Isabella (Author) / Iacona, Gwen (Thesis director) / Makings, Elizabeth (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of International Letters and Cultures (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-05
165449-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Arid and semiarid ecosystems (known as drylands) cover 45% of global land area and are predicted to expand to encompass half of the world’s land area by the end of the century. Litter decomposition plays a large role in nutrient and carbon cycling in dryland ecosystems, yet it remains poorly

Arid and semiarid ecosystems (known as drylands) cover 45% of global land area and are predicted to expand to encompass half of the world’s land area by the end of the century. Litter decomposition plays a large role in nutrient and carbon cycling in dryland ecosystems, yet it remains poorly understood. Models that accurately predict decomposition in mesic ecosystems fail to accurately describe decomposition in drylands due to differing drivers of decomposition but also because litter in drylands accumulates around litter retention elements (LREs). LREs can be any object or surface that inhibits the movement vectors (e.g., wind) that push litter across drylands, creating a “pool” of litter around the LRE. Litter pooling increases the amount of mixing between litter and soil, creating a microclimate more conducive to microbial decomposition. Due to the increase in microbial decomposition, the decomposition rate for litter around LREs can be markedly different than that of litter not in LREs. To further understand how much litter accumulates in LREs, I studied the differences in litter accumulation between LREs and open areas in five drylands across the Southwestern United States. To do this, I visually analyzed photos of 424 litterbags to determine the cover percentages of four different types of organic litter (grass, broadleaf, reproductive, woody) and rock litter. Visual analysis of litterbags consisted of manually delineating the percent coverage of each of these litter categories. Litterbags had been placed in both open intercanopy areas as well as woody sub-canopy areas in which the plant canopy acted as the LRE. Additionally, 45 of these litterbags were randomly selected for analysis in the computer program FIJI (FIJI is Just ImageJ) to assess the litter area find the percent difference between visual and digital analysis. Areas underneath woody sub-canopies accumulated far more organic matter litter over time than open areas between canopies did but displayed a similar amount of rock litterbag cover. Shrub microsites also displayed far more varied litterbag cover percentages than open microsites. Data also suggested that litter does not always accumulate underneath shrubs or open intercanopy areas and may dissipate as time progresses. These results support the idea that litter accumulation varies throughout drylands, and that soil and litter mix frequently in LREs such as under woody plant canopies. The percent difference between FIJI analysis and visual analysis was generally negative, reflecting that visual estimation of litterbag cover was typically smaller than digital estimates. Cumulatively, litter was shown to accumulate much more around LREs and even move from them – supporting the idea that litter decomposition models need to account for litter movement in drylands to be accurate.
ContributorsNelson, Benjamin (Author) / Throop, Heather (Thesis director) / Ball, Becky (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-05