Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

153487-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Internet browsers are today capable of warning internet users of a potential phishing attack. Browsers identify these websites by referring to blacklists of reported phishing websites maintained by trusted organizations like Google, Phishtank etc. On identifying a Unified Resource Locator (URL) requested by a user as a reported phishing URL,

Internet browsers are today capable of warning internet users of a potential phishing attack. Browsers identify these websites by referring to blacklists of reported phishing websites maintained by trusted organizations like Google, Phishtank etc. On identifying a Unified Resource Locator (URL) requested by a user as a reported phishing URL, browsers like Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome display an 'active' warning message in an attempt to stop the user from making a potentially dangerous decision of visiting the website and sharing confidential information like username-password, credit card information, social security number etc.

However, these warnings are not always successful at safeguarding the user from a phishing attack. On several occasions, users ignore these warnings and 'click through' them, eventually landing at the potentially dangerous website and giving away confidential information. Failure to understand the warning, failure to differentiate different types of browser warnings, diminishing trust on browser warnings due to repeated encounter are some of the reasons that make users ignore these warnings. It is important to address these factors in order to eventually improve a user’s reaction to these warnings.

In this thesis, I propose a novel design to improve the effectiveness and reliability of phishing warning messages. This design utilizes the name of the target website that a fake website is mimicking, to display a simple, easy to understand and interactive warning message with the primary objective of keeping the user away from a potentially spoof website.
ContributorsSharma, Satyabrata (Author) / Bazzi, Rida (Thesis advisor) / Walker, Erin (Committee member) / Gaffar, Ashraf (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
134339-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Implementing a distributed algorithm is more complicated than implementing a non-distributed algorithm. This is because distributed systems involve coordination of different processes each of which has a partial view of the global system state. The only way to share information in a distributed system is by message passing. Task that

Implementing a distributed algorithm is more complicated than implementing a non-distributed algorithm. This is because distributed systems involve coordination of different processes each of which has a partial view of the global system state. The only way to share information in a distributed system is by message passing. Task that are straightforward in a non-distributed system, like deciding on the value of a global system state, can be quite complicated to achieve in a distributed system [1]. On top of the difficulties caused by the distributed nature of the computations, distributed systems typically need to be able to operate normally even if some of the nodes in the system are faulty which further adds to the uncertainty that processes have about the global state. Many factors make the implementation of a distributed algorithms difficult. Design patterns [2] are useful in simplifying the development of general algorithms. A design pattern describes a high level solution to a common, abstract problem that many systems may face. Common structural, creational, and behavioral problems are identified and elegantly solved by design patterns. By identifying features that an algorithm uses, and framing each feature as one of the common problems that a specific design pattern solves, designing a robust implementation of an algorithm becomes more manageable. In this way, design patterns can aid the implementation of algorithms. Unfortunately, design patterns are typically not discussed when developing distributed algorithms. Because correctly developing a distributed algorithm is difficult, many papers (eg. [1], [3], [4]) focus on verifying the correctness of the developed algorithm. Papers that are more practical ([5], [6]) establish the correctness of their algorithm and that their algorithm is efficient enough to be practical. However, papers on distributed algorithms usually make little mention of design patterns. The goal of this work was to gain experience implementing distributed systems including learning the application of design patterns and the application of related technical topics. This was achieved by implementing a currently unpublished algorithm that is tentatively called Bakery Consensus. Bakery Consensus is a replicated state-machine protocol that can tolerate servers with Byzantine faults, but assumes non-faulty clients. The algorithm also establishes non-skipping timestamps for each operation completed by the replicated state-machine. The design of the structure, communication, and creation of the different system parts depended heavily upon the book Design Patterns [2]. After implementing the system, the success of the in implementing its various parts was based upon their ability to satisfy the SOLID [7] principles as well as their ability to establish low coupling and high cohesion [8]. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We begin by providing background information about distributed algorithms, including replicated state-machine protocols and the Bakery Consensus algorithm. Section 3 gives a background on several design patterns and software engineering principles that were used in the development process. Section 4 discusses the well designed parts of the system that used design patterns, and how these design patterns were chosen. Section 5 discusses well designed system parts that relied upon other technical topics. Section 6 discusses system parts that need redesign. The conclusion summarizes what was accomplished by the implementation process and the lessons learned about design patterns for distributed algorithms.
ContributorsStoutenburg, Tristan Kaleb (Author) / Bazzi, Rida (Thesis director) / Richa, Andrea (Committee member) / Computer Science and Engineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-05
155726-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Phishing is a form of online fraud where a spoofed website tries to gain access to user's sensitive information by tricking the user into believing that it is a benign website. There are several solutions to detect phishing attacks such as educating users, using blacklists or extracting phishing characteristics found

Phishing is a form of online fraud where a spoofed website tries to gain access to user's sensitive information by tricking the user into believing that it is a benign website. There are several solutions to detect phishing attacks such as educating users, using blacklists or extracting phishing characteristics found to exist in phishing attacks. In this thesis, we analyze approaches that extract features from phishing websites and train classification models with extracted feature set to classify phishing websites. We create an exhaustive list of all features used in these approaches and categorize them into 6 broader categories and 33 finer categories. We extract 59 features from the URL, URL redirects, hosting domain (WHOIS and DNS records) and popularity of the website and analyze their robustness in classifying a phishing website. Our emphasis is on determining the predictive performance of robust features. We evaluate the classification accuracy when using the entire feature set and when URL features or site popularity features are excluded from the feature set and show how our approach can be used to effectively predict specific types of phishing attacks such as shortened URLs and randomized URLs. Using both decision table classifiers and neural network classifiers, our results indicate that robust features seem to have enough predictive power to be used in practice.
ContributorsNamasivayam, Bhuvana Lalitha (Author) / Bazzi, Rida (Thesis advisor) / Zhao, Ziming (Committee member) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017