![150324-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-08/150324-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=3VoKUAnqb4PMyz0W_R7Lc4RJIoNDQAG.&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T035039Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=cedca65a271041bc03d4907e20c6a88111588aa8c9c16b8fe15b68b7d5a4d18f&itok=4niqGSYR)
![148190-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-07/148190-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=EJCB6SzLC5SaStxvuFnOKnZrTMo0fqHj&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T194515Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=3b29a1f720e2c246a1d9320171964a018a52de8fd694cf19488a5deb7919c0f2&itok=iV4_8caR)
When examining the medical doctrines of previous empires, they reveal the influence of religion, societal attitudes, and the historical context that influenced the scholars that penned them. The advancements during the Islamic Golden age can be seen in the field of medicine, which had the Greco-Roman medical corpus as their foundation and the source of the theory of the four humors and anatomical beliefs. This paper will analyze the effect of cultural, societal, and historical influences on the medical doctrines of Muslim medieval physicians in the Golden Age and the works of the Roman physician Galen, and demonstrate how these effects result in similarities and differences in medical practice and the understanding of disease and anatomy. Due to translation efforts that were supported by religious views on the accumulation of knowledge and the efforts of the Abbasid empire, resultant acceptance of the theory of the four humors and anatomical doctrines is observed in the treatment and perception of disease, which would consist of this paper's focus on surgery, diet therapy and associations with nature. However, with further analysis of the extent of this acceptance and the findings in the Islamic medical doctrines, the differences in experimental methods, religious interpretations, and cultural attitudes shows a deviation from the Galenic tradition, with the second set of the paper's focus being human dissection, cause of disease, and experimentation. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate the impact of religion, societal attitudes, culture and the accepted paradigm on the practice of medicine and the study of anatomy, and what would cause a challenge against the legacy of Galen.
![137282-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/137282-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=JdSoyy6pFeEfyIfYOAVeX9HwS8V0q6UC&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T023908Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=9659443c3ad6c986b9114dd09a62f430f9b8776f423bf85241eb4b6d0824064f&itok=TYzTGMqM)
The purpose of this study is to know whether the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a role in the sensorimotor memory. It was hypothesized that temporary disruption of the M1 following the learning to minimize a tilt using a ‘L’ shaped object would negatively affect the retention of sensorimotor memory and thus reduce interference between the memory acquired in one context and the visual cues to perform the same task in a different context.
Significant findings were shown in blocks 1, 2, and 4. In block 3, subjects displayed insignificant amount of learning. However, it cannot be concluded that there is full interference in block 3. Therefore, looked into 3 effects in statistical analysis: the main effects of the blocks, the main effects of the trials, and the effects of the blocks and trials combined. From the block effects, there is a p-value of 0.001, and from the trial effects, the p-value is less than 0.001. Both of these effects indicate that there is learning occurring. However, when looking at the blocks * trials effects, we see a p-value of 0.002 < 0.05 indicating significant interaction between sensorimotor memories. Based on the results that were found, there is a presence of interference in all the blocks but not enough to justify the use of TMS in order to reduce interference because there is a partial reduction of interference from the control experiment. It is evident that the time delay might be the issue between context switches. By reducing the time delay between block 2 and 3 from 10 minutes to 5 minutes, I will hope to see significant learning to occur from the first trial to the second trial.
![149522-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-08/149522-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=aqeVR31zklZjvs5TAuCY50ojVxs08V7M&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T035040Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=e5caa9e185e48f75c0fdb287f941094c708f2765c1de749d35fec645f2286dd2&itok=ILZbnbzu)
![135922-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135922-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=l5_yWDW8J.BklmwRcoNbn7zs3Z2FUuA5&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T075352Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=0d416a9fa034262a537670ebd84e4c661a349ba52ea2243a9e58fcfb86106697&itok=oEqupi-N)
![132654-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/132654-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=LvExMWM.tDDg5KJKoUZnzleXZwjEZyE1&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T035040Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=5785dbd7efd6861c151d1a282555ebb78d3bffee15c8acf9895d8de12cfaae9a&itok=WYtFRgzs)
![134531-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/134531-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=0qZ0haCiiiWiG3ZOrSv3Qn1M72Lwvd1K&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T035040Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=ff0b5f9c1ddbca45d72ec825205770b754f9d1162076ab15d90f112e63d99653&itok=ge37iIU7)
![135438-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135438-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=IhTfwej98aMWxkwDfc6s6c97SCyJ9WgZ&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T035040Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=18f5e7ee111540242710c892f0eb041105a1c3f5b313a04cb1fbfec4d62a0095&itok=HIX3RTZS)
![172902-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/172902-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=i0ltZKMu2_CdlPTJOzIHhhMBEzeBkLz8&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T110526Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=9bf060ec74325f20c61f4b8bb2d2e4a587cf3e7f1b8f6ac21ca2ca24b563f34c&itok=TW2WvpZc)
In March 2011 the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and around sixty agricultural organizations (OSGATA et al.) filed a suit against Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology L.L.C., collectively called Monsanto. The hearings for Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association (OSGATA) et al. v. Monsanto (2012) took place at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, New York. The district court's Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald dismissed OSGATA's suit. A year later, OSGATA appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., and the court agreed with the District Court's 2013 decision. OSGATA appealed to the US Supreme Court in late 2013, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case in 2014. In the OSGATA et al. v. Monsanto case, OSGATA claimed that genetically modified seeds are a threat to both human health and conventional and organic farming. OSGATA petitioned that because of this threat, twenty-three of Monsanto's patents on genetic modification processes and technologies were invalid.