Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Animal Physiology
- All Subjects: experiment
- Creators: Hartwell, Leland
- Creators: Beiner, Susan
Description
Visual presentation of information is one method of learning that has the ability to enhance STEM learning compared to learning solely through text. Educational psychology research is ongoing in the STEM field for how students can learn better through visual representations in their course material. The goal of this study was to assess student responses to visual mini-lessons related to course content in the cardiovascular unit in Animal Physiology (BIO360) at Arizona State University. Study participants completed a series of eight mini-lessons and a survey on their experience with the visual lessons. The results of the survey identify increased desire for visual learning materials in STEM courses. The study participants reported that they felt more visual aids in their STEM courses would increase their understanding of course content and that their classroom performance would improve.
ContributorsRauch, Grace (Author) / Hartwell, Leland (Thesis director) / Harrison, Jon (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Human Evolution & Social Change (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
Description
Alongside the many challenges of Covid-19, the pandemic also disrupted the normal structure of education for students. As classes were being transferred to online formats, computer science students started learning more through constructivism principles rather than the traditionally taught, in-person lectures. This quantitative assessment hopes to determine whether constructivist principles or traditional/visual cognition principles are better for teaching computer science topics. Determinations will be made through a social behavioral experiment teaching pointers to participants. Participants were split into three groups: a control group, a constructivist group, and a visual cognition group. Each group took part in an assessment testing their knowledge retention about pointers after having a lecture based around each teaching method. The assessment evaluated retries per assessment, time per correct answer, time per question, and the average time taken in total. The results of the experiment led to a conclusion that, according to the resulting data, constructivism teaching principles benefited participant scores, and visual cognition teaching principles worsened participant scores. However, a definitive answer of which teaching method is better for computer science could not be made due to insufficient sample size. When reflecting on the first iteration of this experiment, it is clear that future iterations of this experiment would benefit from a higher sample size, an easier assignment for the constructivist group, a feedback survey, and a longer period to experiment.
ContributorsTiruchinapalli, Sai Santosh (Author) / Burger, Kevin (Thesis director) / Hartwell, Leland (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2023-05
Description
“Tell It to the Frogs: Fukushima’s nuclear disaster and its impact on the Japanese Tree Frog” is a representation of the work from Giraudeau et. al’s “Carotenoid distribution in wild Japanese tree frogs (Hyla japonica) exposed to ionizing radiation in Fukushima.” This paper looked to see if carotenoid levels in the tree frog’s vocal sac, liver, and blood were affected by radiation from Fukushima’s power plant explosion. Without carotenoids, the pigment that gives the frogs their orange color on their necks, their courtship practices would be impacted and would not be as able to show off their fitness to potential mates. The artwork inspired by this research displayed the tree frog’s degradation over time due to radiation, starting with normal life and ending with their death and open on the table. The sculptures also pinpoint where the carotenoids were being measured with a brilliant orange glaze. Through ceramic hand building, the artist created larger than life frogs in hopes to elicit curiosity about them and their plight. While the paper did not conclude any changes in the frog’s physiology after 18 months of exposure, there are still questions that are left unanswered. Why did these frogs not have any reaction? Could there be any effects after more time has passed? Is radiation leakage as big of a problem as previously thought? The only way to get the answers to these questions is to be aware of these amphibians, the circumstances that led them to be involved, and continued research on them and radiation.
ContributorsWesterfield, Savannah (Author) / Beiner, Susan (Thesis director) / McGraw, Kevin (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / School of Art (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-05