Matching Items (4)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Self-Compassion
- All Subjects: addiction and recovery
- All Subjects: Middle-aged persons--Psychology.
- Creators: Gueci, Nika
- Creators: Davis, Mary C
- Member of: Theses and Dissertations
- Resource Type: Text
- Status: Published
Description
Collegiate recovery programs (CRPs) are university-sanctioned initiatives for students in recovery from alcohol and other drug addiction. Given the ever-rising rates of alcohol and opioid use and misuse, a great need exists to understand how to provide support for those who are considering recovery or who choose a recovery lifestyle in college. The purpose of this action research study was to examine peer-to-peer support for students in recovery. The development of two training innovations, Recovery 101 and Recovery Ally, were delivered to health and wellness peer educators called the Well Devil Ambassadors (WDAs) with the goal of equipping them to better support their peers in recovery. Learning objectives for the training were to gain knowledge about addiction and recovery and to enhance positive attitudes toward students in recovery, which could thereby increase self-efficacy and behavior intention to work with their peers in recovery. Mindfulness was included in the trainings to enhance the WDAs’ experience and provide tools for a self-care skillset. Quantitative data included pre, post, and follow-up surveys for the Recovery 101 training. Qualitative data included short-answer questions following Recovery 101 training and in-depth interviews following Recovery Ally training. Findings indicated that the information provided in Recovery 101 built the WDAs’ knowledge on the topics of addiction and recovery; hearing multiple perspectives from students in recovery allowed the WDAs to increase empathy toward students in recovery; and the building of knowledge, empathy, and mindfulness allowed the WDAs to gain self-efficacy and behavior intention when supporting their peers in recovery.
ContributorsGueci, Nika (Author) / Henriksen, Danah (Thesis advisor) / Moses, Karen (Committee member) / Ruth, Alissa (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
This paper will use a national cross-sectional survey approach to look at the association between trainable mind-body qualities (mindfulness and self-compassion) with well-being and resilience in 111 college students across the U.S.. Specifically, it will investigate (1) the relationship between trainable qualities (mindfulness, self-compassion) and the resilience, and subjective well-being in students, and (2) compare how these variables were distributed based on enrollment in a college course on compassion. After examination of descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations, comparative analyses were also employed to determine whether enrollment in compassion college courses had any relationship to one’s scores. Results: Respondents included 12 students enrolled in Compassion college course, and 99 students who were not. Both mindfulness and self-compassion showed significant positive correlations with well-being and resilience in all students, and in subgroups based on enrollment at p < .01. Additionally, students enrolled in the course averaged 3 points higher scores across all measures except resilience, where scores were about the same. Conclusions: In all college students, regardless of their enrollment in Compassion, well-being and resilience are positively correlated with both mindfulness and self-compassion. Furthermore, scores based on enrollment in “Compassion” yielded higher levels of mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and well-being.
ContributorsBrown, Evaline (Author) / Pipe, Teri (Thesis director) / Gueci, Nika (Committee member) / Jimenez, Manuela (Committee member) / Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-05
Description
Interpersonal strain is linked with depressive symptoms in middle-aged adults. Self-compassion is an emerging resilience construct that may be advantageous in navigating relationship strain by helping individuals respond to emotions in a kind and nonjudgmental way. Although theory and empirical evidence suggests that self-compassion is protective against the impact of stress on mental health outcomes, many studies have not investigated how self-compassion operates in the context of relationship strain. In addition, few studies have examined psychological or physiological mechanisms by which self-compassion protects against mental health outcomes, depression in particular. Thus, this study examined 1) the extent to which trait self-compassion buffers the relation between family strain and depressive symptoms, and 2) whether these buffering effects are mediated by hope and inflammatory processes (IL-6) in a sample of 762 middle-aged, community-dwelling adults. Results from structural equation models indicated that family strain was unrelated to depressive symptoms and the relation was not moderated by self-compassion. Hope, but not IL-6, mediated the relation between family strain and depressive symptoms and the indirect effect was not conditional on levels of self-compassion. Taken together, the findings suggest that family strain may lead individuals to experience less hope and subsequent increases in depressive symptoms, and further, that a self-compassionate attitude does not affect this relation. Implications for future self-compassion interventions are discussed.
ContributorsMistretta, Erin (Author) / Davis, Mary C. (Thesis advisor) / Karoly, Paul (Committee member) / Infurna, Frank (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Identifying transtheoretical mechanisms of self-compassion is important for understanding its use as a treatment approach for depression and anxiety. This study examined the effectiveness of self-compassion and detached reappraisal on mechanisms involved in the processing of rejection, namely attention, appraisals, and affect. Rejection is a common experience that can increase individuals risk for poor mental health outcomes, especially among those with rejection sensitivity. Outcomes are framed within the Situated Action Cycle, which offers an integrated approach to examining mechanisms of cognitive, affective, and behavioral processing. Online participants who reported at least moderate levels of rejection sensitivity were recruited to participate in the study. Study 1 documented that recalling an experience of rejection led to rejection-related emotions as opposed to conflict-related emotions, as expected. Additionally, a brief self-compassion writing induction produced expected increases in state self-compassion and positive affect, but also unexpected increases in state reappraisal. A brief detached reappraisal induction led to unexpected decreases in state reappraisal, particularly for those with marginalized identities. Study 2, which included a neutral control condition, found that brief self-compassion training increased negative attention bias and controllability appraisals and decreased positive affect. Detached reappraisal led to greater reductions in positive affect compared to both self-compassion and control conditions. Further, detached reappraisal led to increases in negative affect compared to the self-compassion condition. Changes observed from pre- to post-intervention in attentional, cognitive, and affective measures were not sustained following a Cyberball rejection manipulation administered one day later. Results from the study reveal nonsuperior effects of either intervention and possible mechanisms of self-compassion interventions for individuals with rejection sensitivity. Self-compassion may be a useful strategy to help individuals with rejection sensitivity attend to the negative emotions experienced during rejection with greater equanimity but may lead to reductions in positive affect. Further work is needed to determine whether the potential benefits of continued self-compassion training outweigh the mixed effects of brief self-compassion training and whether such benefits are superior to other evidence-based approaches.
ContributorsMistretta, Erin G (Author) / Davis, Mary C (Thesis advisor) / Shiota, Michelle N (Committee member) / Luecken, Linda L (Committee member) / Blais, Rebecca K (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023