This thesis investigates the application of EICP in a soil collected from the Arizona State University Polytechnic campus. The surficial soil in the region is known to be a clayey sand. Both EICP and MICP have their limitations in soils consisting of a significant percentage of fines. Fine-grained soils have a greater surface area which requires the precipitation of a greater amount of carbonate to increase the soil’s strength. EICP was chosen due to not requiring any living organisms during the application, having a faster reaction rate and size constraints.
To determine the effectiveness of EICP as a method of improving a soil with a significant amount of fines, multiple comparisons were made: 1) The soil’s strength was analyzed on its own, untreated; 2) The soil was treated with EICP to determine if bio-cementation can strengthen the soil; 3) The soil had sand added to reduce the fines content and was treated with EICP to determine how the fines percentage effects the strength of a soil when treated with EICP.
While the EICP treatment increased the strength of the soil by over 3-fold, the strength was still relatively low when compared to results of other case studies treating sandy soils. More research could be done with triaxial testing due to the samples of the Polytechnic soil’s strength coming from capillarity.
The majority of trust research has focused on the benefits trust can have for individual actors, institutions, and organizations. This “optimistic bias” is particularly evident in work focused on institutional trust, where concepts such as procedural justice, shared values, and moral responsibility have gained prominence. But trust in institutions may not be exclusively good. We reveal implications for the “dark side” of institutional trust by reviewing relevant theories and empirical research that can contribute to a more holistic understanding. We frame our discussion by suggesting there may be a “Goldilocks principle” of institutional trust, where trust that is too low (typically the focus) or too high (not usually considered by trust researchers) may be problematic. The chapter focuses on the issue of too-high trust and processes through which such too-high trust might emerge. Specifically, excessive trust might result from external, internal, and intersecting external-internal processes. External processes refer to the actions institutions take that affect public trust, while internal processes refer to intrapersonal factors affecting a trustor’s level of trust. We describe how the beneficial psychological and behavioral outcomes of trust can be mitigated or circumvented through these processes and highlight the implications of a “darkest” side of trust when they intersect. We draw upon research on organizations and legal, governmental, and political systems to demonstrate the dark side of trust in different contexts. The conclusion outlines directions for future research and encourages researchers to consider the ethical nuances of studying how to increase institutional trust.