As sustainability grows in popularity, it is important to understand what may influence people’s perceptions of the environment so that knowledge of how to motivate people to engage in sustainable practices is obtained. This project investigates people's perceptions on green infrastructure in relation to people’s motivation in order to engage in pro-environmental behavior. This study employs an online survey sent to student athletes at Arizona State University followed up by an semi-constructed interview to understand what kind of access these athletes had to green infrastructure while growing up, how much they value the environment today, and whether or not they attribute their current perceptions of the environment to their childhood access to green infrastructure. Findings suggest that there may be a relationship between student athletes’ access to green infrastructure and a higher value of the environment but only in those who are knowledgeable about how green infrastructure can impact the human population. By showing a possible correlation between access to green infrastructure and motivation to conserve the environment, this study shows the importance of environmental design and how the built environment influences people’s perceptions and behavior toward environmental sustainability.

This work studies the influence on music and sound on visual media. It takes two visual media clips and sets them with several musical and compositions. Each piece of music is different in genre and tone, thus changing the audiences perception of the media. It also studies how different genres appeal to different demographics and how this can be used to appeal to them.

This study investigates the effects of familiarity and the size of a novel object on perception of depth. Familiar size is a visual depth cue that provides information about the distance of an object. This project explores if the familiar size illusion is a result of an automatic perceptual process or an intellectual thought process. This data was collected in two phases, a familiarization phase and a testing phase. The experimental participants were familiarized for 30 seconds with a novel object, while the control group was not shown any objects prior to presentation of test objects. The novel test stimuli were constructed in 5 sizes and participants in the familiar group were familiarized with the medium size object. Participants were then asked to indicate the perceived distance of different sized objects by moving a rod with a pointer at the end to match the distance. The smaller comparison objects subtended visual angles that participants had not previously experienced, while larger comparison objects produced a larger visual angle than the participants had seen during the familiarization phase. The testing phase was identical for both familiar and unfamiliar control groups. Apparent distance was influenced by the size of the objects. Larger objects were judged to be closer than the smaller objects. Participants not familiarized showed smaller effects of stimulus size than the familiarized group. The effect of familiarity was not significant for the smaller stimuli but was very significant for the larger stimuli. The results were not consistent with the cognitive theory which argues that familiar size is a result of a conscious thought process. These outcomes are predicted under the model of familiar size being an automatic perceptual process.

The goal of the research is to assist Barrett Honors students at Arizona State University by generating a mindset that embraces feelings of stress rather than avoiding it. After data collection was complete, the researchers created a valuable and necessary field guide for ASU Barrett Faculty to provide for incoming students. The present study has been compiled to prove the importance of reframing one's perception of stress as an aid, reducing one's “symptomatic” perception of stress and experiencing life's stresses as challenges, and to cease living in a constant unhealthy state of fight or flight. The main research questions are: What is the average perceived stress level of Barrett Honors students and what information can ASU further provide incoming Barrett students that will alleviate overall perceived stress levels based on the data collection and field guide generated from the present study? The basis of the present study began with a survey compiled of demographic questions, questions relating to the Human Event (HE - a required honors course), and lastly the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Sheldon Cohen, Tom Kamarck, and Robin Mermelstein, with slight modification for students relating to their perception of stress over the last semester. After survey responses were concluded, it was determined that the average perceived stress score among honors students was 18.57, shockingly lower than what was previously thought. The overall results of the PSS survey indicate that Barrett students are moderately stressed, disproving the researchers initial hypothesis that honors students perceived stress scores would be considered high on the PSS. The results did provide researchers with enough data to compile an incoming Barrett student field guide based on desired information reported in the survey. A discussion of the results explores the purpose of how the present study can be used in helping students with perceived stress, interpretations and significance of the data, correlation between academic success and perceived stress, major contributions to the study, and limitations and recommendations for future research.

The goal of the research is to assist Barrett Honors students at Arizona State University by generating a mindset that embraces feelings of stress rather than avoiding it. After data collection was complete, the researchers created a valuable and necessary field guide for ASU Barrett Faculty to provide for incoming students. The present study has been compiled to prove the importance of reframing one's perception of stress as an aid, reducing one's “symptomatic” perception of stress and experiencing life's stresses as challenges, and to cease living in a constant unhealthy state of fight or flight. The main research questions are: What is the average perceived stress level of Barrett Honors students and what information can ASU further provide incoming Barrett students that will alleviate overall perceived stress levels based on the data collection and field guide generated from the present study? The basis of the present study began with a survey compiled of demographic questions, questions relating to the Human Event (HE - a required honors course), and lastly the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Sheldon Cohen, Tom Kamarck, and Robin Mermelstein, with slight modification for students relating to their perception of stress over the last semester. After survey responses were concluded, it was determined that the average perceived stress score among honors students was 18.57, shockingly lower than what was previously thought. The overall results of the PSS survey indicate that Barrett students are moderately stressed, disproving the researchers initial hypothesis that honors students perceived stress scores would be considered high on the PSS. The results did provide researchers with enough data to compile an incoming Barrett student field guide based on desired information reported in the survey. A discussion of the results explores the purpose of how the present study can be used in helping students with perceived stress, interpretations and significance of the data, correlation between academic success and perceived stress, major contributions to the study, and limitations and recommendations for future research.