Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: perception
- All Subjects: Reading comprehension--Computer-assisted instruction.
- Genre: Academic theses
- Creators: Glenberg, Arthur M.
Description
ABSTRACT This thesis proposes that a focus on the bodily level of analysis can unify explanation of behavior in cognitive, social, and cultural psychology. To examine this unifying proposal, a sensorimotor mechanism with reliable explanatory power in cognitive and social psychology was used to predict a novel pattern of behavior in cultural context, and these predictions were examined in three experiments. Specifically, the finding that people judge objects that require more motor effort to interact with as farther in visual space was adapted to predict that people with interdependent self-construal(SC) , relative to those with independent SC, would visually perceive their cultural outgroups as farther relative to their cultural in-groups. Justifying this cultural extension of what is primarily a cognitive mechanism is the assumption that, unlike independents, Interdependents interact almost exclusively with in-group members, and hence there sensorimotor system is less tuned to cross-cultural interactions. Thus, interdependents, more so than independents, expect looming cross-cultural interactions to be effortful, which may inflate their judgment of distance to the out-groups. Two experiments confirmed these predictions: a) interdependent Americans, compared to independent Americans, perceived American confederates (in-group) as visually closer; b) interdependent Arabs, compared to independent Arabs, perceived Arab confederates (in-group) as closer; and c) interdependent Americans, relative to independent Americans, perceived Arab confederates (out-group) as farther. A third study directly established the proposed relation between motor effort and distance to human targets: American men perceived other American men as closer after an easy interaction than after a more difficult interaction. Together, these results demonstrate that one and the same sensorimotor mechanism can explain/predict homologous behavioral patterns across the subdisciplines of psychology.
ContributorsSoliman, Tamer (Author) / Glenberg, Arthur M. (Committee member) / Kwan, Sau (Committee member) / Cohen, Adam (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
This study examines the effects of providing persuasive writing and reading comprehension strategy training on source-based essay writing. Strategy training was administered through the use of the Writing Pal and the Interactive Strategy Trainer for Active Reading and Thinking (iSTART). The impact of both individual (writing or reading) and blended strategy training on source-based writing was investigated. A total of 261 participants completed the study; after removing incomplete and second language participants the source-based writing and system performance was assessed for 175 participants (n no instruction = 48, n iSTART =41, n Writing Pal =41, n blended =45).
Results indicated that participants who received blended strategy training produced higher quality source-based essays than participants who received only reading comprehension, writing strategy training, or no training. Furthermore, participants who received only reading comprehension or writing strategy training did not produce higher quality source-based essays than participants in the no-training control group. Time on task was investigated as a potential explanation for the results. Neither total time on task nor practice time were predictive of group differences on source-based essay scores. Analyses further suggested that the impact of strategy training does not differ as a function of prior abilities; however, training does seem to impact the relation between prior abilities and source-based essay scores. Specifically, prior writing ability was unrelated to performance for those who received writing training (i.e., Writing Pal and blended conditions), and prior reading ability was unrelated to performance for those received the full dosage of iSTART training. Overall, the findings suggest that when taught in conjunction with one another, reading comprehension and writing strategy training transfers to source-based writing, providing a positive impact on score. Potential changes to the Writing Pal and iSTART to more closely align training with source-based writing are discussed as methods of further increasing the impact of training on source-based writing.
Results indicated that participants who received blended strategy training produced higher quality source-based essays than participants who received only reading comprehension, writing strategy training, or no training. Furthermore, participants who received only reading comprehension or writing strategy training did not produce higher quality source-based essays than participants in the no-training control group. Time on task was investigated as a potential explanation for the results. Neither total time on task nor practice time were predictive of group differences on source-based essay scores. Analyses further suggested that the impact of strategy training does not differ as a function of prior abilities; however, training does seem to impact the relation between prior abilities and source-based essay scores. Specifically, prior writing ability was unrelated to performance for those who received writing training (i.e., Writing Pal and blended conditions), and prior reading ability was unrelated to performance for those received the full dosage of iSTART training. Overall, the findings suggest that when taught in conjunction with one another, reading comprehension and writing strategy training transfers to source-based writing, providing a positive impact on score. Potential changes to the Writing Pal and iSTART to more closely align training with source-based writing are discussed as methods of further increasing the impact of training on source-based writing.
ContributorsWeston Jennifer L (Author) / McNamara, Danielle S. (Thesis advisor) / Connor, Carol M (Committee member) / Glenberg, Arthur M. (Committee member) / Graham, Steve (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Fractal analyses examine variability in a time series to look for temporal structure
or pattern that reveals the underlying processes of a complex system. Although fractal
property has been found in many signals in biological systems, how it relates to
behavioral performance and what it implies about the complex system under scrutiny are
still open questions. In this series of experiments, fractal property, movement kinematics,
and behavioral performance were measured on participants performing a reciprocal
tapping task. In Experiment 1, the results indicated that the alpha value from detrended
fluctuation analysis (DFA) reflected deteriorating performance when visual feedback
delay was introduced into the reciprocal tapping task. This finding suggests that this
fractal index is sensitive to performance level in a movement task. In Experiment 2, the
sensitivity of DFA alpha to the coupling strength between sub-processes within a system
was examined by manipulation of task space visibility. The results showed that DFA
alpha was not influenced by disruption of subsystems coupling strength. In Experiment 3,
the sensitivity of DFA alpha to the level of adaptivity in a system under constraints was
examined. Manipulation of the level of adaptivity was not successful, leading to
inconclusive results to this question.
or pattern that reveals the underlying processes of a complex system. Although fractal
property has been found in many signals in biological systems, how it relates to
behavioral performance and what it implies about the complex system under scrutiny are
still open questions. In this series of experiments, fractal property, movement kinematics,
and behavioral performance were measured on participants performing a reciprocal
tapping task. In Experiment 1, the results indicated that the alpha value from detrended
fluctuation analysis (DFA) reflected deteriorating performance when visual feedback
delay was introduced into the reciprocal tapping task. This finding suggests that this
fractal index is sensitive to performance level in a movement task. In Experiment 2, the
sensitivity of DFA alpha to the coupling strength between sub-processes within a system
was examined by manipulation of task space visibility. The results showed that DFA
alpha was not influenced by disruption of subsystems coupling strength. In Experiment 3,
the sensitivity of DFA alpha to the level of adaptivity in a system under constraints was
examined. Manipulation of the level of adaptivity was not successful, leading to
inconclusive results to this question.
ContributorsNguyen, Tri, M.A (Author) / Amazeen, Eric L (Thesis advisor) / Glenberg, Arthur M. (Thesis advisor) / Amazeen, Polemnia G (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019