Matching Items (4)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Automotive Engineering
- Genre: Academic theses
- Creators: Gaffar, Ashraf
- Creators: Wishart, Jeffrey
- Status: Published
Description
Driver distraction research has a long history spanning nearly 50 years, intensifying in the last decade. The focus has always been on identifying the distractive tasks and measuring the respective harm level. As in-vehicle technology advances, the list of distractive activities grows along with crash risk. Additionally, the distractive activities become more common and complicated, especially with regard to In-Car Interactive System. This work's main focus is on driver distraction caused by the in-car interactive System. There have been many User Interaction Designs (Buttons, Speech, Visual) for Human-Car communication, in the past and currently present. And, all related studies suggest that driver distraction level is still high and there is a need for a better design. Multimodal Interaction is a design approach, which relies on using multiple modes for humans to interact with the car & hence reducing driver distraction by allowing the driver to choose the most suitable mode with minimum distraction. Additionally, combining multiple modes simultaneously provides more natural interaction, which could lead to less distraction. The main goal of MMI is to enable the driver to be more attentive to driving tasks and spend less time fiddling with distractive tasks. Engineering based method is used to measure driver distraction. This method uses metrics like Reaction time, Acceleration, Lane Departure obtained from test cases.
ContributorsJahagirdar, Tanvi (Author) / Gaffar, Ashraf (Thesis advisor) / Ghazarian, Arbi (Committee member) / Gray, Robert (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Driving is already a complex task that demands a varying level of cognitive and physical load. With the advancement in technology, the car has become a place for media consumption, a communications center and an interconnected workplace. The number of features in a car has also increased. As a result, the user interaction inside the car has become overcrowded and more complex. This has increased the amount of distraction while driving and has also increased the number of accidents due to distracted driving. This thesis focuses on the critical analysis of today’s in-car environment covering two main aspects, Multi Modal Interaction (MMI), and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), to minimize the distraction. It also provides deep market research on future trends in the smart car technology. After careful analysis, it was observed that an infotainment screen cluttered with lots of small icons, a center stack with a plethora of small buttons and a poor Voice Recognition (VR) results in high cognitive load, and these are the reasons for the increased driver distraction. Though the VR has become a standard technology, the current state of technology is focused on features oriented design and a sales driven approach. Most of the automotive manufacturers are focusing on making the VR better but attaining perfection in VR is not the answer as there are inherent challenges and limitations in respect to the in-car environment and cognitive load. Accordingly, the research proposed a novel in-car interaction design solution: Multi-Modal Interaction (MMI). The MMI is a new term when used in the context of vehicles, but it is widely used in human-human interaction. The approach offers a non-intrusive alternative to the driver to interact with the features in the car. With the focus on user-centered design, the MMI and ADAS can potentially help to reduce the distraction. To support the discussion, an experiment was conducted to benchmark a minimalist UI design. An engineering based method was used to test and measure distraction of four different UIs with varying numbers of icons and screen sizes. Lastly, in order to compete with the market, the basic features that are provided by all the other competitors cannot be eliminated, but the hard work can be done to improve the HCaI and to make driving safer.
ContributorsNakrani, Paresh Keshubhai (Author) / Gaffar, Ashraf (Thesis advisor) / Sohoni, Sohum (Committee member) / Ghazarian, Arabi (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
To date, there is not a standardized method for consistently quantifying the performance of an automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicle (AV). The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to a framework for such an approach referred to throughout as the operational safety assessment (OSA) methodology. Through this research, safety metrics are identified, researched, and analyzed to capture aspects of the operational safety of AVs, interacting with other salient objects. This dissertation outlines the approach for developing this methodology through a series of key steps including: (1) comprehensive literature review; (2) research and refinement of OSA metrics; (3) generation of MATLAB script for metric calculations; (4) generation of simulated events for analysis; (5) collection of real-world data for analysis; (6) review of OSA methodology results; and (7) discussion of future work to expand complexity, fidelity, and relevance aspects of the OSA methodology. The detailed literature review includes the identification of metrics historically used in both traditional and more recent evaluations of vehicle performance. Subsequently, the metric formulations are refined, and robust severity evaluations are proposed. A MATLAB script is then presented which was generated to calculate the metrics from any given source assuming proper formatting of the data. To further refine the formulations and the MATLAB script, a variety of simulated scenarios are discussed including car-following, intersection, and lane change situations. Additionally, a data collection activity is presented, leveraging the SMARTDRIVE testbed operated by Maricopa County Department of Transportation in Anthem, AZ to collect real-world data from an active intersection. Lastly, the efficacy of the OSA methodology with respect to the evaluation of vehicle performance for a set of scenarios is evaluated utilizing both simulated and real-world data. This assessment provides a demonstration of the ability and robustness of this methodology to evaluate vehicle performance for a given scenario. At the conclusion of this dissertation, additional factors including fidelity, complexity, and relevance are explored to contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation.
ContributorsComo, Steven Gerard (Author) / Wishart, Jeffrey (Thesis advisor) / Yang, Yezhou (Thesis advisor) / Chen, Yan (Committee member) / Favaro, Francesca (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
The need for robust verification and validation of automated vehicles (AVs) to ensure driving safety grows more urgent as increasing numbers of AVs are allowed to operate on open roads. To address this need, AV developers can present a safety case to regulators and the public that provides an evidence-based justification of their assertion that an AV is safe to operate on open roads. This work aims to describe the development of a scenario-based testing methodology that contributes to this safety case. A high-level definition of this test selection and scoring methodology (TSSM) is first presented, along with an outline of its scope and key ideas. This is followed by a literature review that details the current state of the art in AV testing, including the driving performance metrics and equations that provide a basis for the TSSM. A chart-based method for quantifying an AV’s operational design domain (ODD) and behavioral competency portfolio is then described that provides the foundation for a scenario generation and filtration process. After outlining a method for the AV to progress through increasingly robust test methods based on its current technology readiness level (TRL), the generation and filtration of two sets of scenarios by the TSSM is outlined: a standardized set that can be used to compare the performance of vehicles with identical ODD and behavioral competency portfolios, and a set containing high-relevance scenarios that is partially randomized to ensure test integrity. A related framework for incorporating testing on open roads is subsequently specified. An equation for an overall AV driving performance score is then defined that quantifies the aggregate performance of the AV across all generated scenarios. The TSSM continues according to an iterative process, which includes a method for exploring edge and corner scenarios, until a stopping condition is achieved. Two proofs of concept are provided: a demonstration of the ability of the TSSM to pare scenarios from a preexisting database, and an example ODD and behavioral competency portfolio specification form. Finally, this work concludes by evaluating the TSSM and its proofs of concept and outlining possible future work on the methodology.
ContributorsO'Malley, Gavin (Author) / Wishart, Jeffrey (Thesis advisor) / Zhao, Junfeng (Thesis advisor) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023