Filtering by
- All Subjects: Stigma
- Creators: Hruschka, Daniel
The goal of this thesis was to better understand the lived experiences of an ethnically and linguistically diverse sample of mothers who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant women experience higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes compared to non-pregnant women. Yet the impact on women’s psychosocial wellbeing may be just as problematic, given new mothers’ increased risk for depression postpartum coupled with the loss of multiple forms of support so critical during the postpartum period and new stressors created by the pandemic. A universal testing strategy at a Labor & Delivery Unit at a hospital in the Southwestern U.S early in the pandemic identified that Communities of Color – particularly resettled refugee women - experienced COVID-19 infection at higher rates compared to White women. Therefore, this study investigates stressors and coping strategies specific to the pregnancy, birth, and postpartum periods in a linguistically diverse sample of 140 women (Swahili n=18 , Kinyarwanda n=18 , Burmese n=13, Arabic=11, Spanish n=35, English n=45) who gave birth between May and December 2020. Across groups, the most severe health stressor was fear of self or infant contracting COVID-19, leading to strict adherence to prevention measures among women, and feelings of social isolation. This was followed by anxiety for lack of social support at birth, and, in some women, management of other health concerns related to increased risk for adverse pregnancy or severe COVID-19 outcomes. Coping strategies included looking to religion or spirituality for comfort, as well as spending more time with family. This analysis of how the pandemic affected women’s psychosocial wellbeing from pregnancy to postpartum informs adaptation of care for linguistically and ethnically minoritized groups and their infants.
Methods First-year students’ meal plan and residence information was provided by a large, public, southwestern university for the 2015-2016 academic year. A subset of students (n=619) self-reported their food security status. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to determine if meal plan purchase and use were associated with food insecurity. Linear GEEs were used to examine several potential reasons for lower meal plan use. Logistic and Linear GEEs were used to determine similarities in meal plan purchase and use for a total of 599 roommate pairs (n=1186 students), and 557 floormates.
Results Students did not use all of the meals available to them; 7% of students did not use their meal plan for an entire month. After controlling for socioeconomic factors, compared to students on unlimited meal plans, students on the cheapest meal plan were more likely to report food insecurity (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.2, 4.1). In Fall, 26% of students on unlimited meal plans reported food insecurity. Students on the 180 meals/semester meal plan who used fewer meals were more likely to report food insecurity (OR=0.9, 95% CI=0.8, 1.0); after gender stratification this was only evident for males. Students’ meal plan use was lower if the student worked a job (β=-1.3, 95% CI=-2.3, -0.3) and higher when their roommate used their meal plan frequently (β=0.09, 99% CI=0.04, 0.14). Roommates on the same meal plan (OR=1.56, 99% CI=1.28, 1.89) were more likely to use their meals together.
Discussion This study suggests that determining why students are not using their meal plan may be key to minimizing the prevalence of food insecurity on college campuses, and that strategic roommate assignments may result in students’ using their meal plan more frequently. Students’ meal plan information provides objective insights into students’ university transition.