Matching Items (2)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Civil Engineering
Description
Resilience is emerging as the preferred way to improve the protection of infrastructure systems beyond established risk management practices. Massive damages experienced during tragedies like Hurricane Katrina showed that risk analysis is incapable to prevent unforeseen infrastructure failures and shifted expert focus towards resilience to absorb and recover from adverse events. Recent, exponential growth in research is now producing consensus on how to think about infrastructure resilience centered on definitions and models from influential organizations like the US National Academy of Sciences. Despite widespread efforts, massive infrastructure failures in 2017 demonstrate that resilience is still not working, raising the question: Are the ways people think about resilience producing resilient infrastructure systems?
This dissertation argues that established thinking harbors misconceptions about infrastructure systems that diminish attempts to improve their resilience. Widespread efforts based on the current canon focus on improving data analytics, establishing resilience goals, reducing failure probabilities, and measuring cascading losses. Unfortunately, none of these pursuits change the resilience of an infrastructure system, because none of them result in knowledge about how data is used, goals are set, or failures occur. Through the examination of each misconception, this dissertation results in practical, new approaches for infrastructure systems to respond to unforeseen failures via sensing, adapting, and anticipating processes. Specifically, infrastructure resilience is improved by sensing when data analytics include the modeler-in-the-loop, adapting to stress contexts by switching between multiple resilience strategies, and anticipating crisis coordination activities prior to experiencing a failure.
Overall, results demonstrate that current resilience thinking needs to change because it does not differentiate resilience from risk. The majority of research thinks resilience is a property that a system has, like a noun, when resilience is really an action a system does, like a verb. Treating resilience as a noun only strengthens commitment to risk-based practices that do not protect infrastructure from unknown events. Instead, switching to thinking about resilience as a verb overcomes prevalent misconceptions about data, goals, systems, and failures, and may bring a necessary, radical change to the way infrastructure is protected in the future.
This dissertation argues that established thinking harbors misconceptions about infrastructure systems that diminish attempts to improve their resilience. Widespread efforts based on the current canon focus on improving data analytics, establishing resilience goals, reducing failure probabilities, and measuring cascading losses. Unfortunately, none of these pursuits change the resilience of an infrastructure system, because none of them result in knowledge about how data is used, goals are set, or failures occur. Through the examination of each misconception, this dissertation results in practical, new approaches for infrastructure systems to respond to unforeseen failures via sensing, adapting, and anticipating processes. Specifically, infrastructure resilience is improved by sensing when data analytics include the modeler-in-the-loop, adapting to stress contexts by switching between multiple resilience strategies, and anticipating crisis coordination activities prior to experiencing a failure.
Overall, results demonstrate that current resilience thinking needs to change because it does not differentiate resilience from risk. The majority of research thinks resilience is a property that a system has, like a noun, when resilience is really an action a system does, like a verb. Treating resilience as a noun only strengthens commitment to risk-based practices that do not protect infrastructure from unknown events. Instead, switching to thinking about resilience as a verb overcomes prevalent misconceptions about data, goals, systems, and failures, and may bring a necessary, radical change to the way infrastructure is protected in the future.
ContributorsEisenberg, Daniel Alexander (Author) / Seager, Thomas P. (Thesis advisor) / Park, Jeryang (Thesis advisor) / Alderson, David L. (Committee member) / Lai, Ying-Cheng (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Nonlinear responses in the dynamics of climate system could be triggered by small change of forcing. Interactions between different components of Earth’s climate system are believed to cause abrupt and catastrophic transitions, of which anthropogenic forcing is a major and the most irreversible driver. Meantime, in the face of global climate change, extreme climatic events, such as extreme precipitations, heatwaves, droughts, etc., are projected to be more frequent, more intense, and longer in duration. These nonlinear responses in climate dynamics from tipping points to extreme events pose serious threats to human society on a large scale. Understanding the physical mechanisms behind them has potential to reduce related risks through different ways. The overarching objective of this dissertation is to quantify complex interactions, detect tipping points, and explore propagations of extreme events in the hydroclimate system from a new structure-based perspective, by integrating climate dynamics, causal inference, network theory, spectral analysis, and machine learning. More specifically, a network-based framework is developed to find responses of hydroclimate system to potential critical transitions in climate. Results show that system-based early warning signals towards tipping points can be located successfully, demonstrated by enhanced connections in the network topology. To further evaluate the long-term nonlinear interactions among the U.S. climate regions, causality inference is introduced and directed complex networks are constructed from climatology records over one century. Causality networks reveal that the Ohio valley region acts as a regional gateway and mediator to the moisture transport and thermal transfer in the U.S. Furthermore, it is found that cross-regional causality variability manifests intrinsic frequency ranging from interannual to interdecadal scales, and those frequencies are associated with the physics of climate oscillations. Besides the long-term climatology, this dissertation also aims to explore extreme events from the system-dynamic perspective, especially the contributions of human-induced activities to propagation of extreme heatwaves in the U.S. cities. Results suggest that there are long-range teleconnections among the U.S. cities and supernodes in heatwave spreading. Findings also confirm that anthropogenic activities contribute to extreme heatwaves by the fact that causality during heatwaves is positively associated with population in megacities.
ContributorsYang, Xueli (Author) / Yang, Zhihua (Thesis advisor) / Lai, Ying-Cheng (Committee member) / Li, Qi (Committee member) / Xu, Tianfang (Committee member) / Zeng, Ruijie (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023