Matching Items (8)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: management
- Creators: Lepine, Jeffery
- Member of: ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
- Status: Published
Description
In my dissertation, I develop a theoretical model that explains how leaders' daily work demands and recovery affect their leadership behaviors. In a departure from the trait approach of leadership which suggests that leaders tend to behave in certain ways that are determined by their heritable characteristics such as personality and intelligence (e.g., Bono & Judge, 2002), and from the contingency approach that suggests leaders behave in ways that are most suitable to the situation based on the needs of followers and the demands of their tasks (e.g., House, 1971), this dissertation draws from the transactional theory of stress (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and positions the stressful demands that leaders experience at work as important determinants of their leadership behaviors. Specifically, I propose that leaders' daily challenge demands (e.g., workload, time pressure, responsibilities) are positively related to job engagement whereas their daily hindrance demands (e.g., role ambiguity, office politics, and hassles) are negatively related to engagement. Engagement, in turn, is positively related to transformational and transactional leadership and negatively related to laissez-faire leadership and abusive supervision. Meanwhile, both challenge and hindrance demands are positively related to strain, which is negatively related to transformational and transactional leadership, and is positively related to laissez-faire leadership and abusive supervision. In addition, leaders' daily after-work recovery experience influences the mediating roles of engagement and strain in the relationships between work demands and leadership behaviors. Specifically, daily recovery moderates both the first stage (i.e., the linkages between work demands and engagement and strain) and the second stage (i.e., the linkages between engagement and strain and leadership behaviors) of the mediation. I test this two-level dual-stage moderated mediation model using a two-week experience sampling design. The sample consists of 26 supervisors and 73 employees who directly report to these supervisors from the flood control district of a metropolitan county in the Southwest United States. Results suggest that leaders' daily challenge demands have a positive influence on transformational leadership attributable to engagement, a negative influence on abusive supervision attributable to engagement, and a positive influence on abusive supervision attributable to strain. Leaders' daily hindrance demands, in contrast, have a positive influence on abusive supervision attributable to strain. In addition, leaders' daily recovery moderates the relationship between strain and laissez-faire leadership so that hindrance demands have a positive influence on laissez-faire leadership when the individual is poorly recovered. Leaders' daily recovery also moderates the relationship between strain and abusive supervision so that hindrance demands have a stronger positive influence on abusive supervision through strain when the individual is poorly recovered.
ContributorsZhang, Yiwen (Author) / Lepine, Jeffery (Thesis advisor) / Judge, Timothy (Committee member) / Ashforth, Blake (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
I develop and test theoretical hypotheses for how employees' authenticity at work influences their motivational, relational, and effectiveness outcomes. These hypotheses are grounded in the idea that when individuals feel they display their true selves at work, they can more fully employ their physical, cognitive and emotional energies in their work roles, which in turn leads to higher levels of employee effectiveness (e.g., task performance, perceived value to the organization, and promotability). In addition to this personal motivational process, individuals who are more authentic also develop high-quality relationships with their coworkers, thereby receiving more instrumental support and minimizing the antagonistic encounters they have with their colleagues. Both types of coworker interactions should, in turn, also influence the focal individual's effectiveness at work. Finally, I hypothesize that the relationships between authenticity and these relational and effectiveness outcomes are moderated by certain personality traits, such that when an individual is highly narcissistic, has very low self-esteem, or has strongly held values or beliefs generally perceived to be negative or deviant, the relationships change: authenticity's positive influence on coworker instrumental support becomes less positive, and authenticity's negative influence on coworker incivility becomes less negative. These moderation effects are expected for employee effectiveness as well. The sample used to test these hypotheses consisted of 102 employees and their 16 supervisors from two private companies headquartered in the Southwest United States. Authenticity was found to be positively associated with employee engagement, coworker instrumental support, and employee effectiveness, and negatively associated with coworker incivility. Once other factors were controlled for, significant relationships remained with employee engagement and coworker support. Contrary to expectations, neither engagement nor coworker interactions mediated the authenticity-employee effectiveness relationship. A dark side of authenticity was found for two of the three personality traits: self-esteem moderated the relationship between authenticity and coworker instrumental support, such that when self-esteem was low, the relationship between authenticity and coworker support was significantly weaker. Additionally, narcissism moderated the relationship between authenticity and employee effectiveness such that when narcissism was low, the relationship between authenticity and effectiveness was positive, but when narcissism was high, the relationship became negative.
ContributorsBuckman, Brooke R (Author) / Lepine, Jeffery (Thesis advisor) / Peterson, Suzanne (Committee member) / Zhang, Zhen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description近20年,中国品牌零售业的快速发展使其成为全球第三大零售市场。消费者的需求量在大幅增长，对于本土企业来说，机遇与挑战并存。
对于连锁型品牌零售企业，员工是其产品和服务的载体。而如何做好不同层次的人员的激励体系，并得以踏实的落实和执行，是企业经营中非常关键的环节，也是品牌零售企业在竞争中获取优势的根本保证。另外，由于连锁零售企业基层员工流动性大、总体素质较低，如何对这部分员工实施有效的绩效考核,成为很多连锁零售企业管理人员面临的一个难题。
本文将长期和短期激励作为主要的研究内容。从整体国内企业来看，运转良好的绩效考评体系并不多，大部分企业的绩效考评体系只注重短期激励而忽视了长期激励的作用，绩效考评关注的是目标的实现，与员工的发展相脱节。因此，如何做好品牌企业的激励体系，如何在人才竞争中取得先机，并最大化企业利润，是本文研究的重心。
目前的研究空白在于对连锁型店铺的激励绩效。而考虑到品牌零售中的连锁经营往往涉及到成百上千家门店，涉及到的从业人数较多，因而对门店的激励绩效的成败是关系到企业整体激励绩效好坏的关键。
本文对激励绩效方案的相关理论进行回顾、分析与总结，从委托代理理论、激励理论、交易成本理论和产权理论入手，分析连锁型品牌零售企业的激励绩效特点。连锁型品牌零售企业合伙制本质上与特许经营精神及设计理念一致，而想要改进的正是特许经营中加盟店与总部的博弈与消耗，形成利益共同体，达到企业价值最大化的目标。
通过连锁型品牌零售企业绩效激励的真实案例（永辉超市合伙人制度、拉夏贝尔店铺合伙人制度、康奈零投入型与交股金型两种店铺合伙人制度）分析得出风险共担、超额利润分成的合伙人制度在连锁型品牌零售企业激励绩效方案设计中的可行性及意义，并从中发现了已有实践存在的问题，并提出建议。
店铺合伙人制度激励店长、提高单店销售业绩、减少交易成本、提高管理效率的正向作用毋庸置疑，建议在实践中积极推行与完善。
对于连锁型品牌零售企业，员工是其产品和服务的载体。而如何做好不同层次的人员的激励体系，并得以踏实的落实和执行，是企业经营中非常关键的环节，也是品牌零售企业在竞争中获取优势的根本保证。另外，由于连锁零售企业基层员工流动性大、总体素质较低，如何对这部分员工实施有效的绩效考核,成为很多连锁零售企业管理人员面临的一个难题。
本文将长期和短期激励作为主要的研究内容。从整体国内企业来看，运转良好的绩效考评体系并不多，大部分企业的绩效考评体系只注重短期激励而忽视了长期激励的作用，绩效考评关注的是目标的实现，与员工的发展相脱节。因此，如何做好品牌企业的激励体系，如何在人才竞争中取得先机，并最大化企业利润，是本文研究的重心。
目前的研究空白在于对连锁型店铺的激励绩效。而考虑到品牌零售中的连锁经营往往涉及到成百上千家门店，涉及到的从业人数较多，因而对门店的激励绩效的成败是关系到企业整体激励绩效好坏的关键。
本文对激励绩效方案的相关理论进行回顾、分析与总结，从委托代理理论、激励理论、交易成本理论和产权理论入手，分析连锁型品牌零售企业的激励绩效特点。连锁型品牌零售企业合伙制本质上与特许经营精神及设计理念一致，而想要改进的正是特许经营中加盟店与总部的博弈与消耗，形成利益共同体，达到企业价值最大化的目标。
通过连锁型品牌零售企业绩效激励的真实案例（永辉超市合伙人制度、拉夏贝尔店铺合伙人制度、康奈零投入型与交股金型两种店铺合伙人制度）分析得出风险共担、超额利润分成的合伙人制度在连锁型品牌零售企业激励绩效方案设计中的可行性及意义，并从中发现了已有实践存在的问题，并提出建议。
店铺合伙人制度激励店长、提高单店销售业绩、减少交易成本、提高管理效率的正向作用毋庸置疑，建议在实践中积极推行与完善。
ContributorsZheng, Laili (Author) / Pei, Ker-Wi (Thesis advisor) / Chen, Xinlei (Committee member) / Zhu, Hongquan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description最近几十年对高管人员个人特征的研究成为组织战略决策领域的重要议题，但其中对
于高管人员的心理感受却几乎从未触及。心理学研究表明，心理感受会很大程度上影响人
的行为。荣耀感，作为最主要的一种与自我意识相关的心理感受，对于工作行为和结果的
影响都非常大。因而，研究企业高管的荣耀感，对理解和预测他们的行为，进而对预测其
个人意志扮演重要角色的公司战略决策有显著意义。
本论文对企业高管的荣耀感进行了系统研究。通过两个研究，中国企业高管的问卷
调查数据，回答了两个问题：1. 企业高管工作荣耀感的内涵是什么？2. 企业高管荣耀感
的高低如何影响其在公司中的战略决策。具体而言，通过 6 人深度访谈和 50 人的开放式
问题问卷的定性研究提炼了企业高管荣耀感的双维度模型，即世俗荣耀感和神圣荣耀感，
202 名企业高管样本的问卷开发了信度和效度达标的两种荣耀感的测量量表（研究一）；
运用 159 名企业高管的问卷数据（研究二）检验了有关两种荣耀感影响公司战略变革意愿
和行为，以及社会创新的不同作用及其边界条件的理论模型和假设。
本研究的主要结论是：
1. 企业高管的世俗荣耀感和神圣荣耀感均正向影响企业战略主动性、战略变革，以
及社会创新战略，其中神圣荣耀感相比世俗荣耀感，对于公司社会创新战略的影响效应更
大；2.企业高管神圣的荣耀感，相比世俗荣耀刚对公司战略主动性的积极作用，受到其感
知到的基于政策环境变化的心理契约违背的影响更大，而世俗的荣耀感，相比神圣荣耀感
对公司社会创新的正向作用，受到其感知到的基于政策环境变化的心理契约违背的影响更
大。
本论文对战略领导力的研究做出了重要贡献。战略管理研究越来越多地关注人的因
素，尤其是企业高管对企业决策、行为以及绩效的影响，但以往对高阶的研究都集中在对
高管人员认知、背景及经验的探讨，本论文首次聚焦于高管人员的情感体验，通过强调高
管人员的荣耀感对组织战略决策的重要性，本研究大大地扩展了战略领导的研究范畴。
论文从心理学的视角出发，首次从内容和来源视角区分荣耀感的两种类型，对原先
从表现形式（momentary experiences and chronic dispositional tendencies）对荣耀感的
分类是个补充，对心理学领域有关荣耀感的研究做出了贡献。本文创造性地将荣耀感的研
究扩展到了企业管理中的高级管理人员，显著地提高了有关个体荣耀感受的理论与管理学
领域理论和实践运用的相关性。
于高管人员的心理感受却几乎从未触及。心理学研究表明，心理感受会很大程度上影响人
的行为。荣耀感，作为最主要的一种与自我意识相关的心理感受，对于工作行为和结果的
影响都非常大。因而，研究企业高管的荣耀感，对理解和预测他们的行为，进而对预测其
个人意志扮演重要角色的公司战略决策有显著意义。
本论文对企业高管的荣耀感进行了系统研究。通过两个研究，中国企业高管的问卷
调查数据，回答了两个问题：1. 企业高管工作荣耀感的内涵是什么？2. 企业高管荣耀感
的高低如何影响其在公司中的战略决策。具体而言，通过 6 人深度访谈和 50 人的开放式
问题问卷的定性研究提炼了企业高管荣耀感的双维度模型，即世俗荣耀感和神圣荣耀感，
202 名企业高管样本的问卷开发了信度和效度达标的两种荣耀感的测量量表（研究一）；
运用 159 名企业高管的问卷数据（研究二）检验了有关两种荣耀感影响公司战略变革意愿
和行为，以及社会创新的不同作用及其边界条件的理论模型和假设。
本研究的主要结论是：
1. 企业高管的世俗荣耀感和神圣荣耀感均正向影响企业战略主动性、战略变革，以
及社会创新战略，其中神圣荣耀感相比世俗荣耀感，对于公司社会创新战略的影响效应更
大；2.企业高管神圣的荣耀感，相比世俗荣耀刚对公司战略主动性的积极作用，受到其感
知到的基于政策环境变化的心理契约违背的影响更大，而世俗的荣耀感，相比神圣荣耀感
对公司社会创新的正向作用，受到其感知到的基于政策环境变化的心理契约违背的影响更
大。
本论文对战略领导力的研究做出了重要贡献。战略管理研究越来越多地关注人的因
素，尤其是企业高管对企业决策、行为以及绩效的影响，但以往对高阶的研究都集中在对
高管人员认知、背景及经验的探讨，本论文首次聚焦于高管人员的情感体验，通过强调高
管人员的荣耀感对组织战略决策的重要性，本研究大大地扩展了战略领导的研究范畴。
论文从心理学的视角出发，首次从内容和来源视角区分荣耀感的两种类型，对原先
从表现形式（momentary experiences and chronic dispositional tendencies）对荣耀感的
分类是个补充，对心理学领域有关荣耀感的研究做出了贡献。本文创造性地将荣耀感的研
究扩展到了企业管理中的高级管理人员，显著地提高了有关个体荣耀感受的理论与管理学
领域理论和实践运用的相关性。
ContributorsZhou, Jun (Author) / Tsui, Anne (Thesis advisor) / Zhu, Hongquan (Thesis advisor) / Qian, Jun (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Employees are directly involved in work tasks and processes which are necessary to accomplish unit or organizational goals, and accordingly, they may become aware of key mistakes, slips, and failures that are unbeknownst to the leader or supervisor responsible for the work unit or organization. Given that errors or deviations in work tasks or processes can have far-reaching effects within the organization, it may be essential for employees to share bad news with their leader or supervisor so that steps can be taken to address the issue or ameliorate negative consequences. However, although employees' sharing of bad news may be important to the organization and should be encouraged, supervisors may respond to the messenger in ways that discourage the behavior. Unfortunately, we lack an explanation of why and under what conditions supervisors respond positively or negatively to employees who share bad news. Thus, the purpose of this dissertation is to address this gap in our understanding. I draw from social exchange theory and the transactional theory of stress to develop a conceptual model of sharing bad news. I suggest that sharing bad news can be cast as a transaction between employees and supervisors that is mediated by supervisors’ appraisals of employees’ sharing the message. The quality of the relationship between an employee and supervisor, or leader-member exchange (LMX), is strengthened when supervisors appraise the sharing of bad news as challenging, or potentially rewarding; however, LMX is weakened when supervisors appraise the sharing of bad news as hindering, or potential harmful. In turn, LMX influences supervisor responses to the sharing of bad news in the form of evaluations of the employee’s effectiveness. In addition to these main effects, I also consider how aspects of the message delivery, such as the timeliness with which messages are conveyed and extent to which employees incorporate solutions when they share bad news, can influence supervisor appraisals of sharing bad news. Finally, I suggest that the extent to which the messenger is responsible for the bad news moderates the relationships between appraisals of sharing bad news and LMX. I test this model in three studies.
ContributorsChamberlin, Melissa (Author) / Lepine, Jeffery (Thesis advisor) / Nahrgang, Jennifer (Committee member) / Zhang, Zhen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017
Description近年来，中国内地FOF业务发展迅速，但在业务发展初期的实践中，FOF管理人在遴选基金资产和预测其未来收益等方面遇到诸多困难，传统的FOF组合构建技术往往不理想。本文借鉴海外因子配置相关理论，尝试通过归因分析基金的收益来源，寻找能深度刻画基金经理管理能力的特质因子，创新性地提出了基于权益类基金的特质因子构建FOF组合的新方法。本文选择100家权益类私募基金，通过因子拆解剥离了市场、行业、风格等共同影响因素，遴选出特质因子表现更优的基金经理，而不是仅仅选择过往业绩好的基金经理，并基于特质因子构建一组FOF组合，与此同时，运用传统方法构建基于基金资产的另一组FOF组合，对比两种组合方法的组合绩效，实证结果显示基于特质因子的FOF组合绩效更优。本文进一步运用转移概率矩阵和相关性分析，找到了基于特质因子的FOF组合绩效更优的证据，即特质因子延续性更好和相关性更低。与基于基金资产的FOF组合配置传统方法相比，由于基金的特质因子延续性更好，运用历史数据预测未来收益的确定性相对更好；基金的特质因子之间的相关性低，大幅增强了FOF组合配置的稳定性和分散性。总体来讲，基于特质因子的FOF组合配置方法为FOF管理人提供了一个更量化、更有效、更稳健的组合配置新路径，能有效提升FOF组合配置的绩效。
关键词: FOF、因子投资、组合配置、特质因子
关键词: FOF、因子投资、组合配置、特质因子
ContributorsLi, Jie (Author) / Zhu, Hongquan (Thesis advisor) / Yan, Hong (Thesis advisor) / Liang, Bing (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description当前，民营企业已成为中国重要支撑力量，而未来5到10年，约有300多万家民营企业面临传承困境。但学术研究领域在传承整体框架、配套机制建设方面有完整论述、有成功案例的所见不多。首先，针对以上民营企业的传承现状，本文将研究、回答五个问题：1、成功传承的标准和要素是什么？2、传承模式有哪几种，每种模式配套的传承机制是什么，该如何建立？3、民营企业应选择何种传承模式，如何选择？4、民营企业的整套传承方案如何落地搭建？5、是否有普适性的、可借鉴的民营企业传承模型，包含哪些要素？
其次，本文主要使用文献研究、案例研究、实证分析，选取中、美、德、日四家不同传承阶段、不同传承模式的知名民营企业，对其传承情况进行深入研究。在此基础上，归纳总结出传承的关键要素，对前述五个问题进行系统解答。同时，本文创新性地结合理论研究、案例研究及企业实践，提出适合我国大部分民营企业的传承全周期管理框架。
最后，根据以上研究，本文总结出关于中国民营企业传承的八大结论及建议：1、本质：权力的交接和义务的传递；2、两大风险：继任风险（继任人的能力要求）、代理风险（继任人对企业核心理念的意愿/忠诚度）；3、降低风险的四大机制：领袖锻造、人才梯队、管控治理、激励机制；4、两大成功要素：“选领袖”和“建机制”；5、四大机制是并行推进、相辅相成的，要尽早构建、持续优化；6、三大模式：家族成员继承、内生培养经理人、外聘职业经理人；7、民营企业传承模型包含七大要素、五大步骤；8、民营企业在制定传承方案时，除了要注意传承模型中的要素，还要注意其他关键要素。
其次，本文主要使用文献研究、案例研究、实证分析，选取中、美、德、日四家不同传承阶段、不同传承模式的知名民营企业，对其传承情况进行深入研究。在此基础上，归纳总结出传承的关键要素，对前述五个问题进行系统解答。同时，本文创新性地结合理论研究、案例研究及企业实践，提出适合我国大部分民营企业的传承全周期管理框架。
最后，根据以上研究，本文总结出关于中国民营企业传承的八大结论及建议：1、本质：权力的交接和义务的传递；2、两大风险：继任风险（继任人的能力要求）、代理风险（继任人对企业核心理念的意愿/忠诚度）；3、降低风险的四大机制：领袖锻造、人才梯队、管控治理、激励机制；4、两大成功要素：“选领袖”和“建机制”；5、四大机制是并行推进、相辅相成的，要尽早构建、持续优化；6、三大模式：家族成员继承、内生培养经理人、外聘职业经理人；7、民营企业传承模型包含七大要素、五大步骤；8、民营企业在制定传承方案时，除了要注意传承模型中的要素，还要注意其他关键要素。
ContributorsCao, Jianwei (Author) / Huang, Xiaochuan (Thesis advisor) / Liang, Bing (Thesis advisor) / Cheng, Shijun (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
Grounded in the relational view of leadership, this dissertation explores the dynamics of the leader/follower relationship in the context of a collective using a social networks approach. Specifically, I build on DeRue and Ashford’s (2010) work that focuses on dynamic, socially constructed leadership relationships within a dyad to focus on such relationships within a collective. In doing so, I conceptualize collective leader endorsement – receiving a grant of leader identity from a collective of followers – and examine the implications of collective leader endorsement. As a dynamic relationship, collective leader endorsement can change as individuals give and receive grants of leader identity. I draw on relational models of leadership theory and appraisal theory to examine how contextual situations (i.e., identity jolts) prompt change in collective leader endorsement at the network level and how such change can influence individual functioning at the individual level. As a socially constructed relationship, collective leader endorsement creates the potential for disagreement among members of the collective regarding grants of leader identity. I draw on social comparison theory and appraisal theory to suggest that agreement (or lack thereof) can influence the individual’s perceived demands and overall functioning within the collective. Using data from 106 individuals on a collegiate football team in the United States over 12 consecutive weeks, I find significant changes in collective leader endorsement and the associated leadership network over the course of the season. Specifically, I find that challenging situations prompted a reevaluation of leader identities and shifted the patterns within the leadership network. In addition, change in an individual’s level of collective leader endorsement prompted additional perceived demands and lowered well-being. This relationship was attenuated if the individual had a supportive coach to help him cope with additional leadership demands. Finally, (lack of) agreement regarding the individual’s leader identity also influenced the individual’s well-being. Specifically, the individual experienced enhanced perceived demands (and associated lower well-being) if the individual’s perception of who should receive grants of leader identity was incongruent with the collective’s perception of collective leader endorsement.
ContributorsBartels, Amy L (Author) / Lepine, Jeffery (Thesis advisor) / Peterson, Suzanne (Thesis advisor) / Luciano, Margaret (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018