Filtering by
- Creators: Arizona Board of Regents
- Creators: Stout, Valerie
![150387-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-08/150387-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=KIlcMCx5TY0V8ibMIFzrN0Jg7rh6Eci5&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240609/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240609T171132Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=c78619b94497eaa75da9e51a3faeaa1203553f292d7615f39b479b946a6874ee&itok=sATSKBvY)
![149931-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-08/149931-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=WapuWgMxS8k0uEGpBZ42HgMqE3JuHP4O&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T225757Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=d3dde54d19c60583ceb7a8046fd2906d3c537ae46f98e1b66deff909279e5ff9&itok=E6LjfMRs)
![152348-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-09/152348-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=aRU00I.Ltidzb53K4ePRFgwxTrhch4I9&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240605/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240605T144604Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=d27f65db441c5b4ce649feb45f9906371f73f7392d712cae835bdf3955a9f93d&itok=qBBPlJCy)
![151797-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-09/151797-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=zw3p.Z4Q.C7_sW6ev5iMZkHfTz8zqiXl&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240530/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240530T153759Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=886c67ea7fab24a9534a9a6567f0fc454149f8b3f9e0f22a7696bfe51ffddb3e&itok=Iob8Bw3l)
![173021-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/173021-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=W_j2eQ6FeNLgZZndIowSUEHCRar6p1C9&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T143849Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=f8e278353f55b37472d41e4891f32c059004c2b5dc1d16dfc1dd93a006c47c35&itok=WfN6argA)
In 2007, Françoise Baylis and Jason Scott Robert published “Part-Human Chimeras: Worrying the Facts, Probing the Ethics” in The American Journal of Bioethics. Within their article, hereafter “Part-Human Chimeras,” the authors offer corrections on “Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse,” a report published in The American Journal of Bioethics in 2007 by Henry Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle, and Debra M. Satz, which discussed the debate on the ethics of creating part-human chimeras. Chimeras are organisms that contain two or more genetically distinct cell lines. Both publications discuss chimeras with DNA from different species, specifically in response to studies in which scientists injected human brain cells into mice. “Part-Human Chimeras,” contributes to a chain of ethical and scientific discussion that occurred in the mid-2000s on whether people should be able to conduct research on chimeras, especially in embryos.
![173024-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/173024-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=bs70jwn9pmdz7Z0TUdYpS.AgV8LEWLu_&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T093659Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=5db50a72705997ddeeaf852c414c913ad973070527500a6208bec108259ec996&itok=wxqozlTr)
In 2006, bioethicist Jason Scott Robert published “The Science and Ethics of Making Part-Human Animals in Stem Cell Biology” in The FASEB Journal. There, he reviews the scientific and ethical justifications and restrictions on creating part-human animals. Robert describes part-human animals, otherwise known as chimeras, as those resulting from the intentional combination of human and nonhuman cells, tissues, or organs at any stage of development. He specifically criticizes restrictions against creating part-human animals made by the National Academy of Sciences, or NAS, in 2005, arguing that while they ensure that such research is morally justifiable, they might limit scientists from conducting useful science using part-human animals or entities. Robert challenges the moral rationales behind prohibiting chimera research, arguing that they may impede scientists from conducting research that could have important benefits to biology and medicine, and suggests how to balance the conflicting moral and scientific needs of such science.
![172961-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/172961-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=zjZt8vOCzbrULciAw2.NP.mC1QUIXDa8&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T022306Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=e373c73109ff4a7740ada8f5d920e14ea682f5356153057b6cda9790325bfb9d&itok=dkdpRUPg)
In 2015, Revive & Restore launched the Woolly Mammoth Revival Project with a goal of engineering a creature with genes from the woolly mammoth and introducing it back into the tundra to combat climate change. Revive & Restore is a nonprofit in California that uses genome editing technologies to enhance conservation efforts in sometimes controversial ways. In order to de-extinct the woolly mammoth, researchers theorize that they can manipulate the genome of the Asian elephant, which is the mammoth’s closest living evolutionary relative, to make it resemble the genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. While their goal is to create a new elephant-mammoth hybrid species, or a mammophant, that looks and functions like the extinct woolly mammoth, critics have suggested researchers involved in the project have misled and exaggerated the process. As of 2021, researchers have not yet succeeded in their efforts to de-extinct the woolly mammoth, but have expressed that it may become a reality within a decade.
![172905-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/172905-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=YCCWc_9MyP5j7g8f7FcutKOygRzJVNd4&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T160056Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=9ad957f0bcb4baa394310e411093e9117edfd5fffec080cc2dc8ca46348449b9&itok=inn7-OVh)
Sir John Bertrand Gurdon further developed nuclear transplantation, the technique used to clone organisms and to create stem cells, while working in Britain in the second half of the twentieth century. Gurdon's research built on the work of Thomas King and Robert Briggs in the United States, who in 1952 published findings that indicated that scientists could take a nucleus from an early embryonic cell and successfully transfer it into an unfertilized and enucleated egg cell. Briggs and King also concluded that a nucleus taken from an adult cell and similarly inserted into an unfertilized enucleated egg cell could not produce normal development. In 1962, however, Gurdon published results that indicated otherwise. While Briggs and King worked with Rana pipiens frogs, Gurdon used the faster-growing species Xenopus laevis to show that nuclei from specialized cells still held the potential to be any cell despite its specialization. In 2012, the Nobel Prize Committee awarded Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka its prize in physiology and medicine for for their work on cloning and pluripotent stem cells.
![172923-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/172923-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=UuJ1P1cGWwx7ZBYeP_rCtFMuOb_J3aVk&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T162153Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=a98801e4dc32788a8eaf62c17e4a699084e8ec85e0566f2a93217b15db3bbcd2&itok=0J5v2kV6)
Telomerase is an enzyme that regulates the lengths of telomeres in the cells of many organisms, and in humans it begins to function int the early stages of embryonic development. Telomeres are repetitive sequences of DNA on the ends of chromosomes that protect chromosomes from sticking to each other or tangling. In 1989, Gregg Morin found that telomerase was present in human cells. In 1996, Woodring Wright and his team examined human embryonic cells and found that telomerase was active in them. Scientists manipulate telomerase in cells to give cells the capacity to replicate infinitely. Telomerase is also necessary for stem cells to replicate themselves and to develop into more specialized cells in embryos and fetuses.
![173216-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-02/173216-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=yzKo2o.a882vN_c_q.kWM61bU5EW9t1y&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T051441Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=4bd3527f4acc41c5f66650e3373f35d79b16a70a74549ba475549525cc0adf17&itok=01jTxGEI)
In Jeter v. Mayo, the Court of Appeals of Arizona in 2005 held that a cryopreserved, three-day-old pre-embryo is not a person for purposes of Arizona's wrongful death statutes, and that the Arizona Legislature was best suited to decide whether to expand the law to include cryopreserved pre-embryos. The Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by the Maricopa County Superior Court to dismiss a couple's wrongful death claim after the Mayo Clinic (Mayo) allegedly lost or destroyed several of their cryopreserved pre-embryos. In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals explored ethical and legal issues relating to cryopreserved pre-embryos, including prior case law, the principles of statutory construction, and the Arizona Legislature's role in balancing the societal interests involved.