Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: artificial intelligence
- Genre: Masters Thesis
Description
Instructional prompts are a novel technique that can significantly improve the performance of natural language processing tasks by specifying the task instruction to the language model. This is the first paper that uses instructional prompts to improve performance of the question answering task in biomedical domain. This work makes two significant contributions. Firstly, a question answer dataset of 600K question answer pairs has been developed by using the medical textbook ‘Differential Diagnosis Primary Care’, which contains information on how to diagnose a patient by observing their disease symptoms. Secondly, a question answering language model augmented with instructional prompts has been developed by training on the medical information extracted from the book ‘Differential Diagnosis Primary Care’. Experiments have been conducted to demonstrate that it performs better than a normal question answering model that does not use instructional prompts. Instructional prompts are based on prompt tuning and prefix tuning, which are novel techniques which can help train language model to do specific downstream tasks by keeping majority of model parameters frozen, and only optimizing a small number of continuous task-specific vectors (called the prefixes).
ContributorsSaxena, Sharad (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Blanco, Eduardo (Committee member) / Anwar, Saadat (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
In this thesis, I present two new datasets and a modification to the existing models in the form of a novel attention mechanism for Natural Language Inference (NLI). The new datasets have been carefully synthesized from various existing corpora released for different tasks.
The task of NLI is to determine the possibility of a sentence referred to as “Hypothesis” being true given that another sentence referred to as “Premise” is true. In other words, the task is to identify whether the “Premise” entails, contradicts or remains neutral with regards to the “Hypothesis”. NLI is a precursor to solving many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks such as Question Answering and Semantic Search. For example, in Question Answering systems, the question is paraphrased to form a declarative statement which is treated as the hypothesis. The options are treated as the premise. The option with the maximum entailment score is considered as the answer. Considering the applications of NLI, the importance of having a strong NLI system can't be stressed enough.
Many large-scale datasets and models have been released in order to advance the field of NLI. While all of these models do get good accuracy on the test sets of the datasets they were trained on, they fail to capture the basic understanding of “Entities” and “Roles”. They often make the mistake of inferring that “John went to the market.” from “Peter went to the market.” failing to capture the notion of “Entities”. In other cases, these models don't understand the difference in the “Roles” played by the same entities in “Premise” and “Hypothesis” sentences and end up wrongly inferring that “Peter drove John to the stadium.” from “John drove Peter to the stadium.”
The lack of understanding of “Roles” can be attributed to the lack of such examples in the various existing datasets. The reason for the existing model’s failure in capturing the notion of “Entities” is not just due to the lack of such examples in the existing NLI datasets. It can also be attributed to the strict use of vector similarity in the “word-to-word” attention mechanism being used in the existing architectures.
To overcome these issues, I present two new datasets to help make the NLI systems capture the notion of “Entities” and “Roles”. The “NER Changed” (NC) dataset and the “Role-Switched” (RS) dataset contains examples of Premise-Hypothesis pairs that require the understanding of “Entities” and “Roles” respectively in order to be able to make correct inferences. This work shows how the existing architectures perform poorly on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset even after being trained on the new datasets. In order to help the existing architectures, understand the notion of “Entities”, this work proposes a modification to the “word-to-word” attention mechanism. Instead of relying on vector similarity alone, the modified architectures learn to incorporate the “Symbolic Similarity” as well by using the Named-Entity features of the Premise and Hypothesis sentences. The new modified architectures not only perform significantly better than the unmodified architectures on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset but also performs as well on the existing datasets.
The task of NLI is to determine the possibility of a sentence referred to as “Hypothesis” being true given that another sentence referred to as “Premise” is true. In other words, the task is to identify whether the “Premise” entails, contradicts or remains neutral with regards to the “Hypothesis”. NLI is a precursor to solving many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks such as Question Answering and Semantic Search. For example, in Question Answering systems, the question is paraphrased to form a declarative statement which is treated as the hypothesis. The options are treated as the premise. The option with the maximum entailment score is considered as the answer. Considering the applications of NLI, the importance of having a strong NLI system can't be stressed enough.
Many large-scale datasets and models have been released in order to advance the field of NLI. While all of these models do get good accuracy on the test sets of the datasets they were trained on, they fail to capture the basic understanding of “Entities” and “Roles”. They often make the mistake of inferring that “John went to the market.” from “Peter went to the market.” failing to capture the notion of “Entities”. In other cases, these models don't understand the difference in the “Roles” played by the same entities in “Premise” and “Hypothesis” sentences and end up wrongly inferring that “Peter drove John to the stadium.” from “John drove Peter to the stadium.”
The lack of understanding of “Roles” can be attributed to the lack of such examples in the various existing datasets. The reason for the existing model’s failure in capturing the notion of “Entities” is not just due to the lack of such examples in the existing NLI datasets. It can also be attributed to the strict use of vector similarity in the “word-to-word” attention mechanism being used in the existing architectures.
To overcome these issues, I present two new datasets to help make the NLI systems capture the notion of “Entities” and “Roles”. The “NER Changed” (NC) dataset and the “Role-Switched” (RS) dataset contains examples of Premise-Hypothesis pairs that require the understanding of “Entities” and “Roles” respectively in order to be able to make correct inferences. This work shows how the existing architectures perform poorly on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset even after being trained on the new datasets. In order to help the existing architectures, understand the notion of “Entities”, this work proposes a modification to the “word-to-word” attention mechanism. Instead of relying on vector similarity alone, the modified architectures learn to incorporate the “Symbolic Similarity” as well by using the Named-Entity features of the Premise and Hypothesis sentences. The new modified architectures not only perform significantly better than the unmodified architectures on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset but also performs as well on the existing datasets.
ContributorsShrivastava, Ishan (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Anwar, Saadat (Committee member) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Significance of real-world knowledge for Natural Language Understanding(NLU) is well-known for decades. With advancements in technology, challenging tasks like question-answering, text-summarizing, and machine translation are made possible with continuous efforts in the field of Natural Language Processing(NLP). Yet, knowledge integration to answer common sense questions is still a daunting task. Logical reasoning has been a resort for many of the problems in NLP and has achieved considerable results in the field, but it is difficult to resolve the ambiguities in a natural language. Co-reference resolution is one of the problems where ambiguity arises due to the semantics of the sentence. Another such problem is the cause and result statements which require causal commonsense reasoning to resolve the ambiguity. Modeling these type of problems is not a simple task with rules or logic. State-of-the-art systems addressing these problems use a trained neural network model, which claims to have overall knowledge from a huge trained corpus. These systems answer the questions by using the knowledge embedded in their trained language model. Although the language models embed the knowledge from the data, they use occurrences of words and frequency of co-existing words to solve the prevailing ambiguity. This limits the performance of language models to solve the problems in common-sense reasoning task as it generalizes the concept rather than trying to answer the problem specific to its context. For example, "The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of a house", is a co-reference resolution problem which requires knowledge. Language models can resolve whether "it" refers to "painting" or "tree", since "house" and "tree" are two common co-occurring words so the models can resolve "tree" to be the co-reference. On the other hand, "The large ball crashed right through the table. Because it was made of Styrofoam ." to resolve for "it" which can be either "table" or "ball", is difficult for a language model as it requires more information about the problem.
In this work, I have built an end-to-end framework, which uses the automatically extracted knowledge based on the problem. This knowledge is augmented with the language models using an explicit reasoning module to resolve the ambiguity. This system is built to improve the accuracy of the language models based approaches for commonsense reasoning. This system has proved to achieve the state of the art accuracy on the Winograd Schema Challenge.
In this work, I have built an end-to-end framework, which uses the automatically extracted knowledge based on the problem. This knowledge is augmented with the language models using an explicit reasoning module to resolve the ambiguity. This system is built to improve the accuracy of the language models based approaches for commonsense reasoning. This system has proved to achieve the state of the art accuracy on the Winograd Schema Challenge.
ContributorsPrakash, Ashok (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Devarakonda, Murthy (Committee member) / Anwar, Saadat (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019