This study aims to determine the feasibility of producing mechanophore-incorporated epoxy that can be healed. This was accomplished by grafting a synthesized mechanophore into tris(2-aminoethyl)amine to create a new epoxy hardener. Then this branched hardener was combined with a second hardener, diethylenetriamine (DETA). A proper ratio of the branched hardener…
This study aims to determine the feasibility of producing mechanophore-incorporated epoxy that can be healed. This was accomplished by grafting a synthesized mechanophore into tris(2-aminoethyl)amine to create a new epoxy hardener. Then this branched hardener was combined with a second hardener, diethylenetriamine (DETA). A proper ratio of the branched hardener to the DETA will ensure that the created epoxy will retain the force responsive characteristics without a noticeable decline in both the physical and thermal properties. Furthermore, it was desired that the natural structure of the epoxy would be left in place, and there would only be enough branched hardener present to elicit a force response and provide the possibility for healing. The two hardeners would then be added to Diglycidyl Ether of Bisphenol F (DGEBPF), which is the epoxy resin. The mechanophore-incorporated epoxy was compared to a standard epoxy—just DETA and DGEBPF—and it was determined that the incorporation of the mechanophore led to an 8.2 degrees Celsius increase in glass transition temperature, and a 33.0% increase in cross link density. This justified the mechanophore-incorporated epoxy as a feasible alternative to the standard, as its primary thermal and physical properties were not only equal, but superior. Then samples of the mechanophore-incorporated epoxy were damaged with a 3% tensile strain. This would cause a cycloreversion in the central cyclobutane inside of the mechanophore. Then they were healed with UV light, which would redimerize the severed hardener moieties. The healed samples saw a 4.69% increase in cross-link density, demonstrating that healing was occurring.
Lithium ion batteries are quintessential components of modern life. They are used to power smart devices — phones, tablets, laptops, and are rapidly becoming major elements in the automotive industry. Demand projections for lithium are skyrocketing with production struggling to keep up pace. This drive is due mostly to the…
Lithium ion batteries are quintessential components of modern life. They are used to power smart devices — phones, tablets, laptops, and are rapidly becoming major elements in the automotive industry. Demand projections for lithium are skyrocketing with production struggling to keep up pace. This drive is due mostly to the rapid adoption of electric vehicles; sales of electric vehicles in 2020 are more than double what they were only a year prior. With such staggering growth it is important to understand how lithium is sourced and what that means for the environment. Will production even be capable of meeting the demand as more industries make use of this valuable element? How will the environmental impact of lithium affect growth? This thesis attempts to answer these questions as the world looks to a decade of rapid growth for lithium ion batteries.
