Matching Items (6)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Accounting
- Creators: Brown, Jennifer
- Creators: Huston, George R
- Member of: ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
- Resource Type: Text
- Status: Published
Description
Responding to the allegedly biased research reports issued by large investment banks, the Global Research Analyst Settlement and related regulations went to great lengths to weaken the conflicts of interest faced by investment bank analysts. In this paper, I investigate the effects of these changes on small and large investor confidence and on trading profitability. Specifically, I examine abnormal trading volumes generated by small and large investors in response to security analyst recommendations and the resulting abnormal market returns generated. I find an overall increase in investor confidence in the post-regulation period relative to the pre-regulation period consistent with a reduction in existing conflicts of interest. The change in confidence observed is particularly striking for small traders. I also find that small trader profitability has increased in the post-regulation period relative to the pre-regulation period whereas that for large traders has decreased. These results are consistent with the Securities and Exchange Commission's primary mission to protect small investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets.
ContributorsDong, Xiaobo (Author) / Mikhail, Michael (Thesis advisor) / Hwang, Yuhchang (Committee member) / Hugon, Artur J (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2011
Description
Existing literature consistently documents a relationship between book-tax differences and future financial performance. Specifically, large book-tax differences are associated with lower earnings persistence. I contend that one reason the tax information contained in financial statements is informative about future earnings is that the relationship between book income and taxable income captures information about a firm's life cycle stage. Using a life cycle measure from the literature, I use fundamental analysis to group firm-year observations into life cycle stages and document a link between book-tax differences and firm life cycle. I build on prior studies that find a relation between earnings persistence and book-tax differences, and earnings persistence and firm life cycle. I find that after controlling for firm life cycle stage, the association between large positive book-tax differences and lower earnings persistence does not hold. My results offer an economic theory based explanation for the relation between book-tax differences and earnings persistence as an alternative explanation to findings in prior research.
ContributorsDrake, Katharine D (Author) / Mikhail, Michael (Thesis advisor) / Brown, Jennifer (Committee member) / Martin, Melissa (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
This paper examines whether CEOs with general managerial skills are better at achieving the goals of external communication. Using the General Ability Index developed by Custodio, Ferreira, and Matos (2013) to measure CEOs' general managerial skills, I find that firms with generalist CEOs are more likely to obtain the desired outcomes of communication, including the smaller difference between analyst forecasts and management guidance, less dispersion in analyst forecasts, higher analyst following, and higher institutional ownership, after controlling for CEO talent and the impact of Regulation FD. Moreover, I provide direct evidence that general managerial skills are more important to external communication under poor information environments. I also investigate the characteristics of analysts who follow firms with generalists, and my findings suggest the private interaction with analysts is an important communication channel for generalists. Finally, I find that generalists are able to attract dedicated investors and gain long-term capital for their firms. Overall, I provide evidence on the growing importance of general managerial skills in external communication. This paper offers new insights into why CEOs with general skills are paid at a premium over those with specific skills, as documented in previous studies.
ContributorsYeh, Eugenia (Author) / Hillegeist, Steve (Thesis advisor) / Brown, Jennifer (Committee member) / Custodio, Claudia (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
U.S. based multinational firms are able to use foreign subsidiaries as a means to reduce their overall tax burden. As disclosure requirements are vague, there is very little useful information provided to firm outsiders to analyze a firm’s foreign operations activity and earnings. I demonstrate that even sophisticated financial statement users, financial analysts, have difficulty predicting the effective tax rate for firms with foreign operations, as evidenced by increased forecast errors for multinational firms as compared to domestic firms. I examine factors that may contribute to the increased difficulty of forecasting for multinationals and find that decreased ETR persistence and the presence of a loss may affect the difficulty of the forecasting task, but the presence or quality of management forecasts may not. The market finds tax forecasts important as evidenced by the positive response to the tax and non-tax components of earnings forecasts. This evidence is useful to investors, policy makers, and others interested in the tax activities of multinational firms.
ContributorsJordan, Erin (Author) / Brown, Jennifer (Thesis advisor) / Hugon, Artur (Committee member) / Huston, Ryan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
In this study, I predict that involvement in a fraud-related securities class action lawsuit is associated with a change in political activity patterns toward less transparent channels and a reduction in the quality of public political disclosures. Allegations of fraud may impair a firm’s reputation and cause the firm to reevaluate the effectiveness of its political strategies. I find evidence that firms involved in a fraud-related securities class action lawsuit are associated with less political action committee (PAC) contributions and more lobbying after the accusation. I find a similar pattern for additional measures of transparency: firms shift from in-house lobbying to contract lobbying, are more likely to spend through their subsidiaries, and increase activity through their subsidiaries in the period after the fraud-related securities class action lawsuit. I also find that firms significantly reduce the level of their voluntary political spending disclosures. Overall, my results provide evidence of a change in real activities and disclosures after an accusation of fraud. While prior research documents that firms generally work to improve their reputations following a fraud, I find evidence that firms reduce the transparency of their corporate political spending and related disclosures.
ContributorsPaparcuri, Christina Marie (Author) / Brown, Jennifer L (Thesis advisor) / Huston, George R (Committee member) / Kenchington, David G (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
This study examines determinants of the length of conflict between firms and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). I hand collect firm disclosures of the number of years open for federal tax purposes to create a proxy for IRS conflict length. Using this proxy, I find evidence that larger firms, firms with more book-tax differences, and firms facing higher IRS attention and audit probabilities are associated with lengthier IRS conflicts. In contrast, firms with higher deferred tax assets, intangibles, return on assets, and firms disclosing participation in the Compliance Assurance Process program are associated with shorter IRS conflicts. Additional analyses show IRS conflict length is positively associated with manager risk preferences and poor tax accounting quality. I also find lengthier IRS conflicts are associated with higher future tax risk and higher audit fees. Tax controversy is becoming increasingly important for firms but remains relatively understudied. I provide empirical evidence on cross-sectional variation in IRS conflict length.
ContributorsPaparcuri, Christian Simon (Author) / Brown, Jennifer L. (Thesis advisor) / Huston, George R (Committee member) / White, Roger M. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020