Matching Items (4)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

134344-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Bee communities form the keystone of many ecosystems through their pollination services. They are dynamic and often subject to significant changes due to several different factors such as climate, urban development, and other anthropogenic disturbances. As a result, the world has been experiencing a decline in bee diversity and abundance,

Bee communities form the keystone of many ecosystems through their pollination services. They are dynamic and often subject to significant changes due to several different factors such as climate, urban development, and other anthropogenic disturbances. As a result, the world has been experiencing a decline in bee diversity and abundance, which can have detrimental effects in the ecosystems they inhabit. One of the largest factors that impacts bees in today's world is the rapid urbanization of our planet, and it impacts the bee community in mixed ways. Not very much is understood about the bee communities that exist in urban habitats, but as urbanization is inevitably going to continue, knowledge on bee communities will need to strengthen. This study aims to determine the levels of variance in bee communities, considering multiple variables that bee communities can differ in. The following three questions are posed: do bee communities that are spatially separated differ significantly? Do bee communities that are separated by seasons differ significantly? Do bee communities that are separated temporally (by year, interannually) differ significantly? The procedure to conduct this experiment consists of netting and trapping bees at two sites at various times using the same methods. The data is then statistically analyzed for differences in abundance, richness, diversity, and species composition. After performing the various statistical analyses, it has been discovered that bee communities that are spatially separated, seasonally separated, or interannually separated do not differ significantly when it comes to abundance and richness. Spatially separated bee communities and interannually separated bee communities show a moderate level of dissimilarity in their species composition, while seasonally separated bee communities show a greater level of dissimilarity in species composition. Finally, seasonally separated bee communities demonstrate the greatest disparity of bee diversity, while interannually separated bee communities show the least disparity of bee diversity. This study was conducted over the time span of two years, and while the levels of variance of an urban area between these variables were determined, further variance studies of greater length or larger areas should be conducted to increase the currently limited knowledge of bee communities in urban areas. Additional studies on precipitation amounts and their effects on bee communities should be conducted, and studies from other regions should be taken into consideration while attempting to understand what is likely the most environmentally significant group of insects.
ContributorsPhan, James Thien (Author) / Sweat, Ken (Thesis director) / Foltz-Sweat, Jennifer (Committee member) / School of Music (Contributor) / School of Molecular Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-05
Description
The decline of honeybee colonies around the world has been linked to the presence of the Varroa destructor, a mite acting as a virus vector for the Acute Bee Paralysis Virus. We developed a model of the infestation of the Apis melliifera honeybee colony by the Acute Bee Paralysis Virus,

The decline of honeybee colonies around the world has been linked to the presence of the Varroa destructor, a mite acting as a virus vector for the Acute Bee Paralysis Virus. We developed a model of the infestation of the Apis melliifera honeybee colony by the Acute Bee Paralysis Virus, which is transmitted by the parasitic Varroa destructor. This is a four dimensional system of nonlinear ODE's for healthy and virus infected bees, total number of mites in the colony and number of mites that carry the virus. The Acute Bee Paralysis Virus can be transmitted between infected and uninfected bees, infected mite to adult bee, infected bee to phoretic mite, and reproductive mites to bee brood. This model is studied with analytical techniques deriving the conditions under which the bee colony can fight off an Acute Bee Paralysis Virus epidemic.
ContributorsDavis, Talia Lasandra (Author) / Kang, Yun (Thesis director) / Lanchier, Nicolas (Committee member) / Moore, Marianne (Committee member) / School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2015-12
162238-Thumbnail Image.png
DescriptionUnderstanding the evolution of opinions is a delicate task as the dynamics of how one changes their opinion based on their interactions with others are unclear.
ContributorsWeber, Dylan (Author) / Motsch, Sebastien (Thesis advisor) / Lanchier, Nicolas (Committee member) / Platte, Rodrigo (Committee member) / Armbruster, Dieter (Committee member) / Fricks, John (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
161386-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This dissertation consists of three papers about opinion dynamics. The first paper is in collaboration with Prof. Lanchier while the other two papers are individual works. Two models are introduced and studied analytically: the Deffuant model and the Hegselmann-Krause~(HK) model. The main difference between the two models is that the

This dissertation consists of three papers about opinion dynamics. The first paper is in collaboration with Prof. Lanchier while the other two papers are individual works. Two models are introduced and studied analytically: the Deffuant model and the Hegselmann-Krause~(HK) model. The main difference between the two models is that the Deffuant dynamics consists of pairwise interactions whereas the HK dynamics consists of group interactions. Translated into graph, each vertex stands for an agent in both models. In the Deffuant model, two graphs are combined: the social graph and the opinion graph. The social graph is assumed to be a general finite connected graph where each edge is interpreted as a social link, such as a friendship relationship, between two agents. At each time step, two social neighbors are randomly selected and interact if and only if their opinion distance does not exceed some confidence threshold, which results in the neighbors' opinions getting closer to each other. The main result about the Deffuant model is the derivation of a positive lower bound for the probability of consensus that is independent of the size and topology of the social graph but depends on the confidence threshold, the choice of the opinion space and the initial distribution. For the HK model, agent~$i$ updates its opinion~$x_i$ by taking the average opinion of its neighbors, defined as the set of agents with opinion at most~$\epsilon$ apart from~$x_i$. Here,~$\epsilon > 0$ is a confidence threshold. There are two types of HK models: the synchronous and the asynchronous HK models. In the former, all the agents update their opinion simultaneously at each time step, whereas in the latter, only one agent is selected uniformly at random to update its opinion at each time step. The mixed model is a variant of the HK model in which each agent can choose its degree of stubbornness and mix its opinion with the average opinion of its neighbors. The main results of this dissertation about HK models show conditions under which the asymptotic stability holds or a consensus can be achieved, and give a positive lower bound for the probability of consensus and, in the one-dimensional case, an upper bound for the probability of consensus. I demonstrate the bounds for the probability of consensus on a unit cube and a unit interval.
ContributorsLi, Hsin-Lun (Author) / Lanchier, Nicolas (Thesis advisor) / Camacho, Erika (Committee member) / Czygrinow, Andrzej (Committee member) / Fishel, Susanna (Committee member) / Motsch, Sebastien (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021