Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Educational evaluation
- Creators: Fischman, Gustavo E
Description
This study examined the intended and unintended consequences associated with the Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS) as perceived and experienced by teachers in the Houston Independent School District (HISD). To evaluate teacher effectiveness, HISD is using EVAAS for high-stakes consequences more than any other district or state in the country. A large-scale electronic survey was used to investigate the model's reliability and validity; to determine whether teachers used the EVAAS data in formative ways as intended; to gather teachers' opinions on EVAAS's claimed benefits and statements; and to understand the unintended consequences that occurred as a result of EVAAS use in HISD. Mixed methods data collection and analyses were used to present the findings in user-friendly ways, particularly when using the words and experiences of the teachers themselves. Results revealed that the reliability of the EVAAS model produced split and inconsistent results among teacher participants, and teachers indicated that students biased the EVAAS results. The majority of teachers did not report similar EVAAS and principal observation scores, reducing the criterion-related validity of both measures of teacher quality. Teachers revealed discrepancies in the distribution of EVAAS reports, the awareness of trainings offered, and among principals' understanding of EVAAS across the district. This resulted in an underwhelming number of teachers who reportedly used EVAAS data for formative purposes. Teachers disagreed with EVAAS marketing claims, implying the majority did not believe EVAAS worked as intended and promoted. Additionally, many unintended consequences associated with the high-stakes use of EVAAS emerged through teachers' responses, which revealed among others that teachers felt heightened pressure and competition, which reduced morale and collaboration, and encouraged cheating or teaching to the test in attempt to raise EVAAS scores. This study is one of the first to investigate how the EVAAS model works in practice and provides a glimpse of whether value-added models might produce desired outcomes and encourage best teacher practices. This is information of which policymakers, researchers, and districts should be aware and consider when implementing the EVAAS, or any value-added model for teacher evaluation, as many of the reported issues are not specific to the EVAAS model.
ContributorsCollins, Clarin (Author) / Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey (Thesis advisor) / Berliner, David C. (Committee member) / Fischman, Gustavo E (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
Increasing public criticism of traditional teacher evaluation systems based largely on classroom observations has spurred an unprecedented shift in the debate surrounding educational accountability policies, specifically about the purposes for and measures used to evaluate teachers. In response to growing public demand and associated federal mandates, states have been prompted to design and implement teacher evaluation systems that use increasingly available, statistically complex models (i.e., value-added) intended to isolate and measure the effects of individual teachers on student academic growth over time. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of school administrators and teachers within one of the largest school districts in the state of Arizona with regards to the design and implementation of a federally-supported, state policy-directed teacher evaluation system based on professional practice and value-added measures. While much research has been conducted on teacher evaluation, few studies have examined teacher evaluation systems in context to better understand the standards of effectiveness used by school administrators and teachers to measure system effectiveness. The perceptions of school administrators and teachers, considering their lived experiences as the subjects of the nation's new and improved teacher evaluation systems in context, must be better understood if state and federal policymakers are to also better recognize and understand the consequences (intended and unintended) associated with the design and implementation of these systems in practice.
ContributorsPaufler, Noelle A (Author) / Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey L (Thesis advisor) / Berliner, David C. (Committee member) / Fischman, Gustavo E (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
Although an integral part of the pedagogical process is the evaluation of students, questions remain about the purpose and characteristics of effective assessments. Assessments should benefit both the instructor and the student, but this could be a challenge in large classes, such as the English service courses offered at the University of Guyana (UG), which are compulsory courses offered to over 2,000 first year students annually. However, the transition to online delivery of these courses because of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has offered new opportunities for innovation in relation to course assessments. Consequently, this Action Research study was undertaken with the intention of improving the methods of assessment in the course, Introduction to the Use of English (ENG 1105), one of the three English service courses currently offered at UG.Multiple methods of data collection, including surveys, and semi-structured interviews, observations and analyses were used to determine how the assessment strategies used in the course helped develop academic self-efficacy in students and prepare them for other courses in their programs of study. The findings from the first two cycles of this study suggest that while the current assessment methods used in the course are beneficial to both lecturers and students, there is a need to adjust aspects of the assessments so students benefit from assessments that better align with other courses in their programs, as well as sharpen their English language skills. The third cycle captures the impact that the use of an innovation-an ungraded portfolio-had on student learning and suggests it should become a regular feature in the English service courses.
ContributorsMc Gowan, Mark Alastair (Author) / Thompson, Nicole L (Thesis advisor) / Fischman, Gustavo E (Committee member) / Wolf, Leigh G (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023