Matching Items (349)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Sustainability
- Creators: Arizona State University
Description
Communications around sustainability have been found to be incongruent with eliciting the transformative change required to address global climate change and its' repercussions. Recent research has been exploring storytelling in sustainability, specifically with an emphasis on reflexive and emancipatory methods. These methods encourage embracing and contextualizing complexity and intend to target entire cognitive hierarchies. This study explores the possibility of using emancipatory and reflexive storytelling as a tool to change attitudes pertaining to the Valley Metro Light Rail, an example of a complex sustainability mitigation effort. I explore this in four steps: 1) Conducted a pre-survey to gauge preexisting attitudes and predispositions; 2) Provided a narrative that uses storytelling methodologies of reflexivity and emancipation through a story about the light rail; 3) Conducted a post-survey to gauge attitude shift resulting from the narrative intervention; 4) Facilitated a focus group discussion to examine impact qualitatively. These steps intended to provide an answer to the question: How does emancipatory and reflexive storytelling impact affective, cognitive and conative attitudes regarding local alternative transportation? By using tripartite attitude model, qualitative and quantitative analysis this paper determines that reflexive and emancipatory storytelling impacts attitudinal structures. The impact is marginal in the survey response, though the shift indicated a narrowing of participant responses towards one another, indicative of participants subscribing to emancipation and reflexivity of their held attitudes. From the group discussion, it was evident from qualitative responses that participants engaged in emancipating themselves from their held attitudes and reflected upon them. In doing so they engaged in collaboration to make suggestions and suggest actions to help those with experiences that differed from their own. Though this research doesn’t provide conclusive evidence, it opens the door for future research to assess these methodologies as a tool to elicit shared values, beliefs and norms, which are necessary for collective action leading to transformative change in response to global climate change.
ContributorsSwanson, Jake Ryan (Author) / Roseland, Mark (Thesis advisor) / Larson, Kelli (Committee member) / Calhoun, Craig (Committee member) / Schoon, Michael (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Massive gaps exist within and across climate efforts, which are often siloed, inequitable, and ineffective within and across local, national, and global community contexts. Climate justice was defined in this study as the need for activism and advocacy to address the disproportionate crises, impacts, and intersectional needs that communities experience due to climate crises. The intent of the “Climate Justice Collaborative Toolkit” and co-development process that I developed and examined in this dissertation was to improve intersectional collaboration, capacity building, and reciprocal agreements that would ensure better mitigation and adaptation of climate crisis events. The purpose of this study was to answer this research question: What are community participants' perceptions of this toolkit and collaborative co-development process for purposes of climate and racial justice? The purpose of this study was also to assess the impacts of the toolkit and accompanying process among members involved in climate justice and action groups, and develop case study stories to help revise and finalize the toolkit and surrounding co-development process for inclusive purposes. I asked these questions via a mixed-methods action research study, in which participants completed a pre-survey instrument, engaged in group orientations and toolkit meetings, participated in group leader interviews, and completed a post-survey instrument. Mixed-methods data suggested the near-unanimous need for greater participation, as well as representation, in climate efforts in order to create more equitable and racial justice outcomes. Additional findings involved to what extent collective groups, organizations, and other entities might better focus on the significant impacts of gender inequality within climate change crises. Another finding evidenced was that the toolkit was also used by participants as a decision-making system that helped enhance participants’ communication efforts and subsequent identifications of climate and racial justice issues, as well as potential solutions. Future iterations from these findings will include more detailed toolkit versions to effectively promote collaboration as linked to case studies presented as stories in the toolkit. This supports that a diverse range of community members’ lived experiences and intersectional issues considered in any climate effort can lead to more equitable, intersectional, and systems changing processes and outcomes.
ContributorsPeel, Michael (Author) / Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey (Thesis advisor) / Morris, Vernon (Committee member) / Kinslow II, Anthony (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Rising inequality is a defining challenge in the 21st century and although the 2030 agenda for sustainable development is far from perfect, its commitment to tackling inequalities is praiseworthy. To this end, a deeper understanding of how social inequality affects sustainable development can help us rethink development policies and practices. Social inequality is multidimensional and in the last two decades, there has been an upsurge of research in this area. However, these research do not provide a comprehensive understanding of the nature and extent of inequality and its impact on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In particular, they ignore important dimensions such as wealth and the environment in their analysis. In this dissertation, the discourse on how inequality has evolved is first explored and the analysis reveals that the inequality discourse has shifted from its early focus on the measurement of conditions, defined as the unequal distribution of income and/or material goods, towards a more comprehensive approach of measuring inequality of opportunities. Second, the dissertation examines the short run and long run relationship between social inequality and sustainable development. This is achieved by relying on panel data for 142 countries using the Coefficient of Human Inequality and the Sustainable Development Goals Index and the findings reveal that social inequality and sustainable development share a negative relationship which appears to be robust to the inclusion of controls and the country’s level of development. Finally, this dissertation examines the inequality situation in Guyana by relying on a survey of 403 households and in doing so it computes a measure of social inequality using the Atkinson index along with the dimensions of income, education, health, wealth and the environment. The dissertation finds that Guyana is experiencing a high level of social inequality and it is hindering the country’s progress on the sustainable development goals.
ContributorsArmstrong, Sydney (Author) / Chhetri, Netra NC (Thesis advisor) / Hernandez-Cortes, Danae DHC (Committee member) / Chhetri, Nalini NC (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
The cost of capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) from ambient air needs to be greatly reduced if it is to contribute significantly to mitigating climate change. Ion-exchange resin (IER) with quaternary ammonium cation binds CO2 when dry and releases it when wet without supplemental energy, making the process attractive for economical Direct Air Capture (DAC). In this study, a design case basis was developed for a system of collectors capable of capturing 1000 tons/day of CO2 via moisture swing sorption. The model uses varying weather parameters such as temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity to understand the impact of weather on the sorbent loading, cycle time (capture and regeneration), and net water loss. Two independent isotherm models, namely Flory Huggins and the modified Langmuir isotherm model were used to estimate the water and CO2 loading of the resin respectively as a function of relative humidity. The capture model suggests a higher capture rate during the summer and daytime (in a diurnal cycle) as the relative humidity is lower. A design optimization model was developed to minimize the capture time and maximize the sorbent loading. The crude rate production and the net water loss can help conduct an economic analysis to determine the cost of carbon capture.
ContributorsTalha, Mohammad Abu (Author) / Green, Matthew (Thesis advisor) / Lackner, Klaus (Committee member) / Cirucci, John (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
University-level sustainability education in Western academia attempts to focus on eliminating future harm to people and the planet. However, Western academia as an institution upholds systems of oppression and reproduces settler colonialism. This reproduction is antithetical to sustainability goals as it continues patterns of Indigenous erasure and extractive relationships to the Land that perpetuate violence towards people and the planet. Sustainability programs, however, offer several frameworks, including resilience, that facilitate critical interrogations of social-ecological systems. In this thesis, I apply the notion of resilience to the perpetuation of settler colonialism within university-level sustainability education. Specifically, I ask: How is settler colonialism resilient in university-level sustainability education? How are, or could, sustainability programs in Western academic settings address settler colonialism? Through a series of conversational interviews with faculty and leadership from Arizona State University School of Sustainability, I analyzed how university-level sustainability education is both challenging and shaped by settler colonialism. These interviews focused on faculty perspectives on the topic and related issues; the interviews were analyzed using thematic coding in NVivo software. The results of this project highlight that many faculty members are already concerned with and focused on challenging settler colonialism, but that settler colonialism remains resilient in this system due to feedback loops at the personal level and reinforcing mechanisms at the institutional level. This research analyzes these feedback loops and reinforcing mechanisms, among others, and supports the call for anti-colonial and decolonial reconstruction of curriculum, as well as a focus on relationship building, shifting of mindset, and school-wide education on topics of white supremacy, settler colonialism, and systems of oppression in general.
ContributorsBills, Haven (Author) / Klinsky, Sonja (Thesis advisor) / Goebel, Janna (Committee member) / Schoon, Michael (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Demand for specialty coffee worldwide is increasing, yet producers primarily located in developing countries struggle to cover their production costs and sustain their livelihood. Coffee producers are globally seeking higher profits by adapting their conventional production practices to be more socially and environmentally responsible. This dissertation aims to analyze the U.S. import demand for coffee and investigate consumer preferences and willingness to pay for coffee labels representing sustainability efforts. Chapter one introduces the coffee industry and the three chapters of this research. In the second chapter, I analyze the influence of consumers' values and the warm glow effect of giving on their willingness to pay for sustainable coffee using a non-hypothetical auction mechanism. I use an information treatment to test the effect of information on consumers' willingness to pay. Providing information increases the premium consumers are willing to pay for sustainable coffee. Regarding values, consumers that like coffee and experience the warm glow of giving are willing to pay a premium for coffee with a sustainability label. Using a hypothetical online choice experiment, in the third chapter, I investigate coffee consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for Fair Trade, Direct Trade, Rainforest Alliance and USDA Organic coffee. I find that consumers value sustainability labels that aim to solve social issues more than those whose primary goal is to solve environmental problems. I find that when two labels are together on a coffee bag, there is no effect on consumers’ utility. However, there is a positive effect on consumers' willingness to pay for coffee labeled simultaneously for Fair Trade and Organic, and simultaneously for Direct Trade and Organic. In the fourth chapter, I estimate coffee price elasticities between major coffee exporters to the U.S. and calculate pass-through import cost using a system-wide differential demand system. I compare imports of arabica and robusta green coffee and estimate the degree to which they complement each other or substitute one another. I find that arabica and robusta from Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico are substitutes but some exceptions show a complementary relationship. The inclusion of the exchange rate into the demand system has a significant effect on U.S. coffee demand. I find an incomplete pass-through cost of the exchange rate to U.S. import prices.
Chapter six concludes by summarizing the results of this dissertation and discussing the future challenges for the coffee industry.
ContributorsFuller, Katherine (Author) / Grebitus, Carola (Thesis advisor) / Schmitz, Troy (Committee member) / Hughner, Renee (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Amidst mounting global crises spanning environmental, social, and economic domains, sustainability education has emerged as a vital pathway toward a thriving future. However, despite its promise, the concept of sustainability often remains superficial, leaving educators ill-equipped to address its complexities. While efforts to integrate sustainability into education are underway, critical pedagogy, a crucial tool for fostering social change, is notably absent from instructional practices. This action research project utilized critical pedagogy to design and implement a critical professional development (CPD) workshop within a larger fellowship program to center justice within sustainability in both content and pedagogical approach. As a result, participants’ definitions and understandings of sustainability increased across all measurements of extent, breadth, and depth. Specifically, participants redefined collaborative relationships and more prominently included notions of justice and equity in their conceptualizations of sustainability and sustainability education. The use of critical pedagogy encouraged teachers to analyze intersectional oppressive systems and fostered a new, critical perspective on sustainability. In their own educational designs, participants demonstrated an intention to model elements of critical pedagogy, such as dialogic action and permeable content. Finally, in alignment with the intended outcomes of CPD, participants developed cooperative space for co-learning, built unity, shared leadership, and felt confident implementing their own professional development to address context-specific concerns. By using critical pedagogy in sustainability education, the workshop participants prioritized deep and caring relationships which fostered empathic engagement with the intersectional and often dehumanizing systems that have led to interconnected global crises. The results indicated that using CPD as a framework could be effective in teacher professional development for sustainability as a design and implementation tool to center critical work that examines systemic issues of injustice and exploitation against both humans and our planet.
ContributorsCashion, Molly Elise (Author) / Judson, Eugene (Thesis advisor) / Casanova, Carlos (Committee member) / Goebel, Janna (Committee member) / Boyce, Ayesha (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024
Description
Engineering polymers are critical for contemporary high-performance applications where toughness, thermal stability, and density are at a premium. These materials often demand high-energy processing conditions or highly reactive monomers that hold negative impacts on human and environmental health. Thus, this work serves to remediate the negative impacts of engineering polymer synthesis by addressing toxicity and processing at the monomer level, while maintaining or exceeding previous thermomechanical and stimuli-responsive performance. Polyurethanes (PUs) represent a class of engineering polymers that possess highly modular properties due to the diverse monomer selection available for their synthesis. The efficient reaction between isocyanates and hydroxyls impart stellar properties and flexible processing modalities, however recent scrutiny regarding the toxicity of the isocyanate precursors has driven the search for non-isocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) pathways. The advancement of bis-carbonylimidazolide (BCI) monomers for the synthesis of NIPU thermoplastics and foams is thoroughly investigated in this work. Remarkably, a novel decarboxylation pathway for BCI monomers controlled by catalyst loading enabled in-situ CO2 generation during crosslinking with trifunctional amines, and resulted in a facile synthetic route for NIPU foams. Further explorations into catalyst considerations revealed Dabco® 33-LV as a suitable mechanism for controlling reaction times and careful selection of surfactant concentration provided control over pore size and geometry. This led to a library of flexible and rigid NIPU foams that displayed a wide range of thermomechanical properties. Furthermore, sequestration of the imidazole byproduct through an efficient Michael reaction identified maleimide and acrylate additives as a viable pathway to eliminate post-processing steps resulting in NIPU foam synthesis that is amenable to current industrial standards. This route held advantages over the isocyanate route, as condensate removal drove molecular weight increase and ultimately achieved the first reported phase separation behavior of a NIPU thermoplastic containing a poly(ethylene glycol) soft segment. Furthermore, sustainable considerations for engineering polymers were explored with the introduction of a novel cyclobutane bisimide monomer that readily installs into various polymeric systems. Direct installation of this monomer, CBDA-AP-I, into a polysulfone backbone enabled controlled photo-cleavage, while further hydroxy ethyl functionalization allowed for incorporation into PU systems for photo-cleavable high-performance adhesive applications.
ContributorsSintas, Jose Ignacio (Author) / Long, Timothy E (Thesis advisor) / Sample, Caitlin S. (Committee member) / Jin, Kailong (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024
Description
Words wield immense power. They help to shape realities, tell stories, and encompass deeper values and intentions on behalf of their users. Buzzwords are imprecise, trendy – and often-frustrating – words that are encountered in daily life. They frame problems, evoke emotional responses, and signal moral values. In this dissertation, I study buzzword use within the field of environmental conservation to better untangle the inherent tension they have long produced: do buzzwords help or hurt collective conservation efforts? Using a mixed methods approach, this dissertation provides descriptive and causal empirical evidence on many of the untested assumptions regarding the behavior, use, and impacts of buzzwords on conservation decision making. First, through a series of expert interviews with conservation professionals, I develop an empirically informed definition and understanding of buzzwords that builds upon the scholarly literature. It identifies eight defining characteristics, elaborates on the nuances of their use, life cycle, and context dependence, and sets forth a series of testable hypotheses on the relationship between buzzwords, trust, and perceptions. Second, I take this empirically informed understanding and employ a large-scale text analysis to interrogate the mainstream conservation discourse. I produce a list of buzzwords used across institutions (e.g., academia, NGOs) in the past five years and link them to predominant conservation frames, comparing the ways in which different institutions relate to and discuss conservation concepts. This analysis validates many long-held paradigms and ubiquitous buzzwords found in conservation such as sustainability and biodiversity, while identifying a more recently emerging framing of inclusive conservation. Third, I experimentally test a set of hypotheses on the effects that buzzwords have on decision making, as moderated through trust. This study finds evidence of a greenwashing effect, whereby buzzwords may produce marginal benefits to less trustworthy organizations through increases in credibility and group identity alignment, but do not outweigh the benefits of being trustworthy in the first place. In the face of many current global challenges requiring cooperation and collective action – such as climate change and environmental degradation – it is imperative to better understand the ways in which communication and framing (including buzzwords) influence decision making.
ContributorsClaborn, Kelly (Author) / Drummond Otten, Caitlin (Thesis advisor) / Janssen, Marcus A. (Thesis advisor) / Anderies, John M. (Committee member) / Carley, Kathleen M. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024