Matching Items (398)
ContributorsWard, Geoffrey Harris (Performer) / ASU Library. Music Library (Publisher)
Created2018-03-18
Description
The pay-as-you-go economic model of cloud computing increases the visibility, traceability, and verifiability of software costs. Application developers must understand how their software uses resources when running in the cloud in order to stay within budgeted costs and/or produce expected profits. Cloud computing's unique economic model also leads naturally to an earn-as-you-go profit model for many cloud based applications. These applications can benefit from low level analyses for cost optimization and verification. Testing cloud applications to ensure they meet monetary cost objectives has not been well explored in the current literature. When considering revenues and costs for cloud applications, the resource economic model can be scaled down to the transaction level in order to associate source code with costs incurred while running in the cloud. Both static and dynamic analysis techniques can be developed and applied to understand how and where cloud applications incur costs. Such analyses can help optimize (i.e. minimize) costs and verify that they stay within expected tolerances. An adaptation of Worst Case Execution Time (WCET) analysis is presented here to statically determine worst case monetary costs of cloud applications. This analysis is used to produce an algorithm for determining control flow paths within an application that can exceed a given cost threshold. The corresponding results are used to identify path sections that contribute most to cost excess. A hybrid approach for determining cost excesses is also presented that is comprised mostly of dynamic measurements but that also incorporates calculations that are based on the static analysis approach. This approach uses operational profiles to increase the precision and usefulness of the calculations.
ContributorsBuell, Kevin, Ph.D (Author) / Collofello, James (Thesis advisor) / Davulcu, Hasan (Committee member) / Lindquist, Timothy (Committee member) / Sen, Arunabha (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
A new algebraic system, Test Algebra (TA), is proposed for identifying faults in combinatorial testing for SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) applications. In the context of cloud computing, SaaS is a new software delivery model, in which mission-critical applications are composed, deployed, and executed on cloud platforms. Testing SaaS applications is challenging because new applications need to be tested once they are composed, and prior to their deployment. A composition of components providing services yields a configuration providing a SaaS application. While individual components
in the configuration may have been thoroughly tested, faults still arise due to interactions among the components composed, making the configuration faulty. When there are k components, combinatorial testing algorithms can be used to identify faulty interactions for t or fewer components, for some threshold 2 <= t <= k on the size of interactions considered. In general these methods do not identify specific faults, but rather indicate the presence or absence of some fault. To identify specific faults, an adaptive testing regime repeatedly constructs and tests configurations in order to determine, for each interaction of interest, whether it is faulty or not. In order to perform such testing in a loosely coupled distributed environment such as
the cloud, it is imperative that testing results can be combined from many different servers. The TA defines rules to permit results to be combined, and to identify the faulty interactions. Using the TA, configurations can be tested concurrently on different servers and in any order. The results, using the TA, remain the same.
in the configuration may have been thoroughly tested, faults still arise due to interactions among the components composed, making the configuration faulty. When there are k components, combinatorial testing algorithms can be used to identify faulty interactions for t or fewer components, for some threshold 2 <= t <= k on the size of interactions considered. In general these methods do not identify specific faults, but rather indicate the presence or absence of some fault. To identify specific faults, an adaptive testing regime repeatedly constructs and tests configurations in order to determine, for each interaction of interest, whether it is faulty or not. In order to perform such testing in a loosely coupled distributed environment such as
the cloud, it is imperative that testing results can be combined from many different servers. The TA defines rules to permit results to be combined, and to identify the faulty interactions. Using the TA, configurations can be tested concurrently on different servers and in any order. The results, using the TA, remain the same.
ContributorsQi, Guanqiu (Author) / Tsai, Wei-Tek (Thesis advisor) / Davulcu, Hasan (Committee member) / Sarjoughian, Hessam S. (Committee member) / Yu, Hongyu (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
Most embedded applications are constructed with multiple threads to handle concurrent events. For optimization and debugging of the programs, dynamic program analysis is widely used to collect execution information while the program is running. Unfortunately, the non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded embedded software makes the dynamic analysis difficult. In addition, instrumentation overhead for gathering execution information may change the execution of a program, and lead to distorted analysis results, i.e., probe effect. This thesis presents a framework that tackles the non-determinism and probe effect incurred in dynamic analysis of embedded software. The thesis largely consists of three parts. First of all, we discusses a deterministic replay framework to provide reproducible execution. Once a program execution is recorded, software instrumentation can be safely applied during replay without probe effect. Second, a discussion of probe effect is presented and a simulation-based analysis is proposed to detect execution changes of a program caused by instrumentation overhead. The simulation-based analysis examines if the recording instrumentation changes the original program execution. Lastly, the thesis discusses data race detection algorithms that help to remove data races for correctness of the replay and the simulation-based analysis. The focus is to make the detection efficient for C/C++ programs, and to increase scalability of the detection on multi-core machines.
ContributorsSong, Young Wn (Author) / Lee, Yann-Hang (Thesis advisor) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Committee member) / Fainekos, Georgios (Committee member) / Lee, Joohyung (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Exhaustive testing is generally infeasible except in the smallest of systems. Research
has shown that testing the interactions among fewer (up to 6) components is generally
sufficient while retaining the capability to detect up to 99% of defects. This leads to a
substantial decrease in the number of tests. Covering arrays are combinatorial objects
that guarantee that every interaction is tested at least once.
In the absence of direct constructions, forming small covering arrays is generally
an expensive computational task. Algorithms to generate covering arrays have been
extensively studied yet no single algorithm provides the smallest solution. More
recently research has been directed towards a new technique called post-optimization.
These algorithms take an existing covering array and attempt to reduce its size.
This thesis presents a new idea for post-optimization by representing covering
arrays as graphs. Some properties of these graphs are established and the results are
contrasted with existing post-optimization algorithms. The idea is then generalized to
close variants of covering arrays with surprising results which in some cases reduce
the size by 30%. Applications of the method to generation and test prioritization are
studied and some interesting results are reported.
has shown that testing the interactions among fewer (up to 6) components is generally
sufficient while retaining the capability to detect up to 99% of defects. This leads to a
substantial decrease in the number of tests. Covering arrays are combinatorial objects
that guarantee that every interaction is tested at least once.
In the absence of direct constructions, forming small covering arrays is generally
an expensive computational task. Algorithms to generate covering arrays have been
extensively studied yet no single algorithm provides the smallest solution. More
recently research has been directed towards a new technique called post-optimization.
These algorithms take an existing covering array and attempt to reduce its size.
This thesis presents a new idea for post-optimization by representing covering
arrays as graphs. Some properties of these graphs are established and the results are
contrasted with existing post-optimization algorithms. The idea is then generalized to
close variants of covering arrays with surprising results which in some cases reduce
the size by 30%. Applications of the method to generation and test prioritization are
studied and some interesting results are reported.
ContributorsKaria, Rushang Vinod (Author) / Colbourn, Charles J (Thesis advisor) / Syrotiuk, Violet (Committee member) / Richa, Andréa W. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
ContributorsBolari, John (Performer) / ASU Library. Music Library (Publisher)
Created2018-10-04
ContributorsOftedahl, Paul (Performer) / ASU Library. Music Library (Publisher)
Created2018-09-29
ContributorsMarshall, Kimberly (Performer) / Meszler, Alexander (Performer) / Yatso, Toby (Narrator) / ASU Library. Music Library (Publisher)
Created2018-09-16
Description
In software testing, components are tested individually to make sure each performs as expected. The next step is to confirm that two or more components are able to work together. This stage of testing is often difficult because there can be numerous configurations between just two components.
Covering arrays are one way to ensure a set of tests will cover every possible configuration at least once. However, on systems with many settings, it is computationally intensive to run every possible test. Test prioritization methods can identify tests of greater importance. This concept of test prioritization can help determine which tests can be removed with minimal impact to the overall testing of the system.
This thesis presents three algorithms that generate covering arrays that test the interaction of every two components at least twice. These algorithms extend the functionality of an established greedy test prioritization method to ensure important components are selected in earlier tests. The algorithms are tested on various inputs and the results reveal that on average, the resulting covering arrays are two-fifths to one-half times smaller than a covering array generated through brute force.
Covering arrays are one way to ensure a set of tests will cover every possible configuration at least once. However, on systems with many settings, it is computationally intensive to run every possible test. Test prioritization methods can identify tests of greater importance. This concept of test prioritization can help determine which tests can be removed with minimal impact to the overall testing of the system.
This thesis presents three algorithms that generate covering arrays that test the interaction of every two components at least twice. These algorithms extend the functionality of an established greedy test prioritization method to ensure important components are selected in earlier tests. The algorithms are tested on various inputs and the results reveal that on average, the resulting covering arrays are two-fifths to one-half times smaller than a covering array generated through brute force.
ContributorsAng, Nicole (Author) / Syrotiuk, Violet (Thesis advisor) / Colbourn, Charles (Committee member) / Richa, Andrea (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Text Classification is a rapidly evolving area of Data Mining while Requirements Engineering is a less-explored area of Software Engineering which deals the process of defining, documenting and maintaining a software system's requirements. When researchers decided to blend these two streams in, there was research on automating the process of classification of software requirements statements into categories easily comprehensible for developers for faster development and delivery, which till now was mostly done manually by software engineers - indeed a tedious job. However, most of the research was focused on classification of Non-functional requirements pertaining to intangible features such as security, reliability, quality and so on. It is indeed a challenging task to automatically classify functional requirements, those pertaining to how the system will function, especially those belonging to different and large enterprise systems. This requires exploitation of text mining capabilities. This thesis aims to investigate results of text classification applied on functional software requirements by creating a framework in R and making use of algorithms and techniques like k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and many others like boosting, bagging, maximum entropy, neural networks and random forests in an ensemble approach. The study was conducted by collecting and visualizing relevant enterprise data manually classified previously and subsequently used for training the model. Key components for training included frequency of terms in the documents and the level of cleanliness of data. The model was applied on test data and validated for analysis, by studying and comparing parameters like precision, recall and accuracy.
ContributorsSwadia, Japa (Author) / Ghazarian, Arbi (Thesis advisor) / Bansal, Srividya (Committee member) / Gaffar, Ashraf (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016