Filtering by
- All Subjects: Marketing
- All Subjects: Sustainability
- Member of: Theses and Dissertations
- Status: Published
This study explored the consumer response and behavioral patterns in relation to sustainability marketing on food packaging. Following a global trend towards sustainability, there has been a recent explosion in the amount of sustainability labels consumers can find on product packaging, though it is not necessarily an indicator of growth of sustainable products in terms of market share. Many marketing factors, such as, price or quality, can influence dietary decisions individuals are making for their households. In the same way, labels that advertise qualities, including ethical production or minimal environmental impact may persuade consumers to buy a product, regardless of whether or not certifications are accurate. The question arises whether individuals are more likely to buy a product that has a sustainability label. More specifically, does this still hold, even if they do not know what that label actually represents? During this study, a variety of household shoppers were surveyed to gather data on consumer awareness, intentions, and overall attitudes towards the credibility and importance of these labels.
University researchers assume an important role in innovation, particularly as a result of the Bayh-Dole Act, which allowed universities to license inventions funded by federal research dollars, to private industry. Aligning the incentives to innovate at the university level with the incentives to adopt downstream, I show that non-exclusive licensing is preferred under both fixed fee and royalty licensing. Finding support for non-exclusive licensing is important as it provides evidence that the concept underlying the Bayh-Dole Act has economic merit, namely that the goals of university-based researchers are consistent with those of society, and taxpayers, in general.
After licensing, new products enter the diffusion process. Using a case study of small holders in Mozambique, I observe substantial geographic clustering of new-variety adoption decisions. Controlling for the other potential factors, I find that information diffusion through space is largely responsible for variation in adoption. As predicted by a social learning model, spatial effects are not based on geographic distance, but rather on neighbor-relationships that follow from information exchange. My findings are consistent with others who find information to be the primary barrier to adoption, and means that adoption can be accelerated by improving information exchange among farmers.
Ultimately, innovation is only useful when adopted by end consumers. Consumers’ choices of new products are determined by many factors such as personal preferences, the attributes of the products, and more importantly, peer recommendations. My experimental data shows that peers are indeed important, but “weak ties” or information from friends-of-friends is more important than close friends. Further, others regarded as experts in the subject matter exert the strongest influence on peer choices.