Matching Items (18)
Filtering by
- Member of: farrelly, deg
- Member of: Arougheti, Stephen
- Member of: MBL History Audio Visual
ContributorsFrankhauser, Gerhard (Contributor) / Parpart, Arthur Kemble, 1903- (Contributor) / Conklin, Edwin Grant, 1863-1952 (Creator) / American Philosophical Society (Publisher) / Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
Created1952-11-19
Description
By the 1930s, the MBL had become "the" place to go during the summer for biological research and training. Luminaries such as Frank Lillie, Edmund Beecher Wilson, Edwin Grant Conklin, and Thomas Hunt Morgan took their students, packed up their families and research labs, and headed to the MBL. They worked in labs, ate together in the Mess, and they often lived in the limited on-campus housing. Life at the MBL was a life where fun, family, and science intertwined. This film, taken in 1935 by B. R. Coonfield of Brooklyn College, captures snippets of life at the MBL. Though the science and equipment are considerably updated and the faces and families have changed, many features remain the same today.
ContributorsProduced by Department of Biology, Brooklyn College (Contributor) / Coonfield, B.R. (Creator)
Created1935
Description
Katsuma Dan reflects on his first meeting with Dr. Victor Heilbrunn at the University of Pennsylvania in December 1930. Recorded at the University of Washington, Friday Harbor group in 1978.
ContributorsDan, Katsuma (Creator)
Created1978
ContributorsFrankhauser, Gerhard (Contributor) / Parpart, Arthur Kemble, 1903- (Contributor) / Conklin, Edwin Grant, 1863-1952 (Creator) / American Philosophical Society (Publisher) / Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
Created1952-11-19
DescriptionDocument recording all the responses from the survey in table form
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-01-21
DescriptionAddendum to document recording all the responses from the survey in table form. This document records all the additional comments made on the survey responses
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-01-21
Description
Survey instrument used in Survey of Academic Library Streaming Video Revisited, 2015
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2015-04-30
ContributorsHutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / farrelly, deg (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-06-21
Description
Keeping Up With… is an online current awareness publication from the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) featuring concise briefs on trends in academic librarianship and higher education. Each edition focuses on a single issue including an introduction to the topic and summaries of key points, including implications for academic libraries. © Copyright 1997-2014, American Library AssociationThis document may be reprinted and distributed for non-commercial and educational purposes only, and not for resale. No resale use may be made of material on this website at any time. All other rights reserved. || Historically, approaches to collection development in libraries relied on the subjective determination of librarians or outside vendors to select the material most suitable to address patron needs. Favoring broad strokes, acquisition policy relied on major publishers and sought to cover general subject areas. Several factors prompted a shift in approach to collection development, including reductions to staffing and budgets, but more importantly technological advancements and the proliferation of e-books caused the reevaluation of the resources patrons accessed and whether the collection accomplished its goal of satisfying their needs. The practice of patron driven acquisition (PDA) refines the broad strokes of acquisition to directly address the demands of patrons while managing costs by purchasing high use material, renting sparsely used titles and paying nothing for titles with no demand.
PDA involves the inclusion of bibliographic records to the catalog for titles the library does not own and permits the patron an opportunity to initiate a purchase. Beyond the practical implications of managing costs and liberating staff time, the PDA model provides patrons easier and quicker access to the widest range of information possible. The service model of populating a collection to protect against the possibility of patrons requiring access is increasingly unsustainable. Although not without its challenges, allowing the patron to provide a collaborative role with librarians in developing a collection serves to manage costs and streamlines the process of creating a collection which best addresses the needs of a constituency.
PDA involves the inclusion of bibliographic records to the catalog for titles the library does not own and permits the patron an opportunity to initiate a purchase. Beyond the practical implications of managing costs and liberating staff time, the PDA model provides patrons easier and quicker access to the widest range of information possible. The service model of populating a collection to protect against the possibility of patrons requiring access is increasingly unsustainable. Although not without its challenges, allowing the patron to provide a collaborative role with librarians in developing a collection serves to manage costs and streamlines the process of creating a collection which best addresses the needs of a constituency.
ContributorsArougheti, Stephen (Author)
Created2014-06
Description
Limiting the immediate access to content, embargoes are designed by publishers to ensure the economic sustainability of their business by requiring users to rely on the purchase of licensing agreements via subscription models. Comparatively, Open Access models which eliminate traditional pay-walls, are gaining prominence for immediate access and reduction of copyright barriers between readers and articles. Wishing to facilitate expanded access to scientific research, the White House sought to implement policy for the timely release of government funded research to the public. For proponents of Open Access, legislation by the House of Representatives in the FIRST Act imposed significant barriers to the public’s timely access of government funded research. Alongside rising subscription costs and increasing advocacy for Open Access, recent actions by the United States and European Union to reduce embargo periods for scientific research have brought to the forefront questions of properly defining the duration of embargoes for publicly funded research.
ContributorsArougheti, Stephen (Author)
Created2014-12