![151748-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-09/151748-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=S4VlWkmkner8hCKahmyWaOyTgyd2wN6O&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240605/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240605T113903Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=253693725ebb88ee4abcebcfb88527fbed22bb214a25e66f8e213be498eabc86&itok=2C63Muc1)
![136686-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/136686-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=IYBADTI88bl8NH4hsdjDdi0mTSAPdr0U&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T031108Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=547c100bfd84fece69b0a6adc3ae6749e593b41d14124a5dde80c44f16720e6b&itok=tTA2nS9S)
![137047-Thumbnail Image.png](/s3/files/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/137047-Thumbnail%20Image.png?itok=LkGh2-UB)
![141461-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-06/141461-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=XX3tbFNKrPAxem2ubZXGWnxpb8BEujXZ&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240602/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240602T100830Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=17cfe72ea48448b83167e21b850f2da436defc089ec8aaf37a2409ed6f84e0ae&itok=GCq4Oc_J)
![141475-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-06/141475-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=XczQ5HnafMQP7B97eyCgt1j3Y_P2.5FM&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240605/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240605T162155Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=d04af621dbb7d5cce1c2abb66d6b5519735da6594dbfdf76446f3af5bc920187&itok=WHXWROA0)
The evolution of cooperation is a fundamental problem in biology, especially for non-relatives, where indirect fitness benefits cannot counter within-group inequalities. Multilevel selection models show how cooperation can evolve if it generates a group-level advantage, even when cooperators are disadvantaged within their group. This allows the possibility of group selection, but few examples have been described in nature. Here we show that group selection can explain the evolution of cooperative nest founding in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Through most of this species’ range, colonies are founded by single queens, but in some populations nests are instead founded by cooperative groups of unrelated queens. In mixed groups of cooperative and single-founding queens, we found that aggressive individuals had a survival advantage within their nest, but foundress groups with such non-cooperators died out more often than those with only cooperative members. An agent-based model shows that the between-group advantage of the cooperative phenotype drives it to fixation, despite its within-group disadvantage, but only when population density is high enough to make between-group competition intense. Field data show higher nest density in a population where cooperative founding is common, consistent with greater density driving the evolution of cooperative foundation through group selection.
![130413-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-04/130413-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=tJXUjihcltyAFFSvZBO4kgC.2HzOf6dB&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240618/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240618T032133Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=381f240f6592f877c598f08a0faa90b4093ab8acdc5cc5499ce48b0cec9f855d&itok=vcotlMyV)
![135002-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135002-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=ozUhItgh5Qi7RbHHS_aa.vyLpRPaiPQ9&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T062953Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=77277e0e0ac354451e99274c0077f564f5919e98904bfd3ba773f66f2b75ec21&itok=XfJeTDtN)
![129259-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-04/129259-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=bH0cx74dCydOoAVdS7QkSZfTYy1sUuHX&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T042108Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=117426ee1cd5d90e5948490781e70088ca10f5b3425f21df6f5d34b74911e030&itok=N98TmwGq)
What's a profession without a code of ethics? Being a legitimate profession almost requires drafting a code and, at least nominally, making members follow it. Codes of ethics (henceforth “codes”) exist for a number of reasons, many of which can vary widely from profession to profession - but above all they are a form of codified self-regulation. While codes can be beneficial, it argues that when we scratch below the surface, there are many problems at their root. In terms of efficacy, codes can serve as a form of ethical window dressing, rather than effective rules for behavior. But even more that, codes can degrade the meaning behind being a good person who acts ethically for the right reasons.
![128778-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-04/128778-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=L.D.iyWTcHCR.B5rRLrOoGB3fgdMRadL&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240619/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240619T012030Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=001efefc3fc194fa17524f8b70dfab0cbe7bb4fd624720862e1cfdcc92953c11&itok=TD0SLN6A)
Online communities are becoming increasingly important as platforms for large-scale human cooperation. These communities allow users seeking and sharing professional skills to solve problems collaboratively. To investigate how users cooperate to complete a large number of knowledge-producing tasks, we analyze Stack Exchange, one of the largest question and answer systems in the world. We construct attention networks to model the growth of 110 communities in the Stack Exchange system and quantify individual answering strategies using the linking dynamics on attention networks. We identify two answering strategies. Strategy A aims at performing maintenance by doing simple tasks, whereas strategy B aims at investing time in doing challenging tasks. Both strategies are important: empirical evidence shows that strategy A decreases the median waiting time for answers and strategy B increases the acceptance rate of answers. In investigating the strategic persistence of users, we find that users tends to stick on the same strategy over time in a community, but switch from one strategy to the other across communities. This finding reveals the different sets of knowledge and skills between users. A balance between the population of users taking A and B strategies that approximates 2:1, is found to be optimal to the sustainable growth of communities.
On-going efforts to understand the dynamics of coupled social-ecological (or more broadly, coupled infrastructure) systems and common pool resources have led to the generation of numerous datasets based on a large number of case studies. This data has facilitated the identification of important factors and fundamental principles which increase our understanding of such complex systems. However, the data at our disposal are often not easily comparable, have limited scope and scale, and are based on disparate underlying frameworks inhibiting synthesis, meta-analysis, and the validation of findings. Research efforts are further hampered when case inclusion criteria, variable definitions, coding schema, and inter-coder reliability testing are not made explicit in the presentation of research and shared among the research community. This paper first outlines challenges experienced by researchers engaged in a large-scale coding project; then highlights valuable lessons learned; and finally discusses opportunities for further research on comparative case study analysis focusing on social-ecological systems and common pool resources. Includes supplemental materials and appendices published in the International Journal of the Commons 2016 Special Issue. Volume 10 - Issue 2 - 2016.