134264-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Nietzsche’s aphoristic style and affinity for rhetorical ‘masks’ raise an acute interpretive problem. The problem is that his fragmented style might be taken to reflect a deeper fragmentation in his thought. For instance, philosopher Raymond Geuss argues that we should

Nietzsche’s aphoristic style and affinity for rhetorical ‘masks’ raise an acute interpretive problem. The problem is that his fragmented style might be taken to reflect a deeper fragmentation in his thought. For instance, philosopher Raymond Geuss argues that we should not read Nietzsche’s thought as being unified. Against Geuss, I argue that we should. To make my case, I appeal to Nietzsche’s meta-philosophy, which gives us plenty of evidence for attributing unity to his thought. I conclude by reflecting on why this result is important for interpreting different aspects of Nietzsche’s work.
459.25 KB application/pdf

Download restricted. Please sign in.
Restrictions Statement

Barrett Honors College theses and creative projects are restricted to ASU community members.

Details

Title
  • Nietzsche, Unity, Genealogy
Contributors
Date Created
2017-05
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Machine-readable links