National immigration policy meets the realities of unauthorized immigration at the local level, often in ways undesired by residents, as exemplified by the dramatic rise of local anti-immigrant legislation in U.S. states and municipalities. Scholars have studied why some states and municipalities, but not others, engage in immigration policy making. Such research is not designed, however, to evaluate how the basic structure of U.S. government facilitates and shapes local protest. To probe that issue, we compare Chiapas, Mexico and Arizona, USA, both peripheral areas significantly affected by unauthorized immigration and national policies designed to control it. We find that the open texture of U.S. federalism facilitates local activism, while Mexico's more centralized government does not. Activists within both states are similar, however, in deploying law creatively to critique national policy, a reminder of the growing worldwide significance of legal pluralism and legal consciousness in the politics of protest.
Details
- Peripheral Matters: The Emergence of Legalized Politics in Local Struggles Over Unauthorized Immigration
- Provine, Doris (Author)
- Luz Rojas-Wiesner, Martha (Author)
- Martinez Velasco, German (Author)
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
- Digital object identifier: 10.1111/lsi.12080
- Identifier TypeInternational standard serial numberIdentifier Value1747-4469
- This is the peer reviewed version of the article, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12080, opens in a new window
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Provine, Doris Marie, Luz Rojas-Wiesner, Martha, & Martinez Velasco, German (2014). Peripheral Matters: The Emergence of Legalized Politics in Local Struggles Over Unauthorized Immigration. LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, 39(3), 601-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12080