Description

Prompted by the involvement of psychologists in torturous interrogations at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the American Psychological Association (APA) revised its Ethics Code Standard 1.02 to prohibit psychologists from engaging in activities that would “justify or defend violating human rights.”

Prompted by the involvement of psychologists in torturous interrogations at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the American Psychological Association (APA) revised its Ethics Code Standard 1.02 to prohibit psychologists from engaging in activities that would “justify or defend violating human rights.” The revision to Standard 1.02 followed APA policy statements condemning torture and prohibiting psycho

Downloads
pdf (103.7 KB)

Download count: 0

Details

Contributors
Date Created
2013
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Brodsky, S.L., Neal, T.M.S., & Jones, M.A. (2013). A reasoned argument against banning psychologists’ involvement in death penalty cases. Ethics & Behavior, 23, 62-66. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.757954

    Machine-readable links