Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Accelerated testing
- Creators: Phelan, Patrick
Description
This study introduces a new outdoor accelerated testing method called “Field Accelerated Stress Testing (FAST)” for photovoltaic (PV) modules performed at two
different climatic sites in Arizona (hot-dry) and Florida (hot-humid). FAST is a combined
accelerated test methodology that simultaneously accounts for all the field-specific stresses
and accelerates only key stresses, such as temperature, to forecast the failure modes by 2-
7 times in advance depending on the activation energy of the degradation mechanism (i.e.,
10th year reliability issues can potentially be predicted in the 2nd year itself for an
acceleration factor of 5). In this outdoor combined accelerated stress study, the
temperatures of test modules were increased (by 16-19℃ compared to control modules)
using thermal insulations on the back of the modules. All other conditions (ambient
temperature, humidity, natural sunlight, wind speed, wind direction, and tilt angle) were
left constant for both test modules (with back thermal insulation) and control modules
(without thermal insulation). In this study, a total of sixteen 4-cell modules with two different construction types (glass/glass [GG] and glass/backsheet [GB]) and two different encapsulant types (ethylene
vinyl acetate [EVA] and polyolefin elastomer [POE]), were investigated at both sites with
eight modules at each site (four insulated and four non-insulated modules at each site). All
the modules were extensively characterized before installation in the field and after field
exposure over two years. The methods used for characterizing the devices included I-V
(current-voltage curves), EL (electroluminescence), UVF (ultraviolet fluorescence), and
reflectance. The key findings of this study are: i) the GG modules tend to operate at a higher temperature (1-3℃) than the GB modules at both sites of Arizona and Florida (a lower
lifetime is expected for GG modules compared to GB modules); ii) the GG modules tend
to experience a higher level of encapsulant discoloration and grid finger degradation than
the GB modules at both sites (a higher level of the degradation rate is expected in GG
modules compared to GB modules); and, iii) the EVA-based modules tend to have a higher
level of discoloration and finger degradation compared to the POE-based modules at both
sites.
ContributorsThayumanavan, Rishi Gokul (Author) / Tamizhmani, Govindasamy (Thesis advisor) / Phelan, Patrick (Thesis advisor) / Calhoun, Ronald (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
The primary goal of this thesis is to evaluate the influence of ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyolefin elastomer (POE) encapsulant types on the glass-glass (GG) photovoltaic (PV) module reliability. The influence of these two encapsulant types on the reliability of GG modules was compared with baseline glass-polymer backsheet (GB) modules for a benchmarking purpose. Three sets of modules, with four modules in each set, were constructed with two substrates types i.e. glass-glass (GG) and glass- polymer backsheet (GB); and 2 encapsulants types i.e. ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyolefin elastomer (POE). Each module set was subjected to the following accelerated tests as specified in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard and Qualification Plus protocol of NREL: Ultraviolet (UV) 250 kWh/m2; Thermal Cycling (TC) 200 cycles; Damp Heat (DH) 1250 hours. To identify the failure modes and reliability issues of the stressed modules, several module-level non-destructive characterizations were carried out and they include colorimetry, UV-Vis-NIR spectral reflectance, ultraviolet fluorescence (UVF) imaging, electroluminescence (EL) imaging, and infrared (IR) imaging. The above-mentioned characterizations were performed on the front side of the modules both before the stress tests (i.e. pre-stress) and after the stress tests (i.e. post-stress). The UV-250 extended stress results indicated slight changes in the reflectance on the non-cell area of EVA modules probably due to minor adhesion loss at the cell and module edges. From the DH-1250 extended stress tests, significant changes, in both encapsulant types modules, were observed in reflectance and UVF images indicating early stages of delamination. In the case of the TC-200 stress test, practically no changes were observed in all sets of modules. From the above short-term stress tests, it appears although not conclusive at this stage of the analysis, delamination seems to be the only failure mode that could possibly be affecting the module performance, as observed from UV and DH extended stress tests. All these stress tests need to be continued to identify the wear-out failure modes and their impacts on the performance parameters of PV modules.
ContributorsBhaskaran, Rahul (Author) / Tamizhmani, Govindasamy (Thesis advisor) / Phelan, Patrick (Thesis advisor) / Wang, Liping (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020