Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Genetic Engineering
- Creators: School of Life Sciences
In the hopes of providing other researchers with a new tool for markerless genetic engineering of cyanobacteria, the toxin MazF from E. coli was developed as a counter-selection marker in the most widely used cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The mazF gene from E. coli was cloned and inserted into a plasmid vector for downstream transformation of Synechocystis. The plasmid construct also contained two homologous flanking regions for integration of the insert into the Synechocystis genome, a nickel-inducible response regulator and promoter to control MazF expression, and a kanamycin resistance gene to serve as the antibiotic marker. In order to ensure the mazF plasmids could be cloned in a MazF-sensitive E. coli host even with slight promoter leakage, MazF expression was toned down by decreasing the efficiency of translation initiation by inserting base pairs between the ribosome binding site and the start codon of the mazF gene. Following successful cloning by E. coli, the mazF plasmids were then used to transform Synechocystis to create mazF mutant strains. Genomic analysis confirmed the successful transformation and segregation of mazF mutant strains containing the desired marker cassette. Phenotypic analysis revealed both growth arrest and production of mazF transcripts in mazF mutant strains following the addition of nickel to the cell cultures, indicating successful nickel-induced MazF expression as desired.
Industries and research utilizing genetically-engineered organisms are often subject to strict containment requirements such as physical isolation or specialized equipment to prevent an unintended escape. A relatively new field of research looks for ways to engineer intrinsic containment techniques- genetic safeguards that prevent an organism from surviving outside of specific conditions. As interest in this field has grown over the last few decades, researchers in molecular and synthetic biology have discovered many novel ways to accomplish this containment, but the current literature faces some ambiguity and overlap in the ways they describe various biocontainment methods. Additionally, the way publications report the robustness of the techniques they test is inconsistent, making it uncertain how regulators could assess the safety and efficacy of these methods if they are eventually to be used in practical, consumer applications. This project organizes and clarifies the descriptions of these techniques within an interactive flowchart, linking to definitions and references to publications on each within an Excel table. For each reference, variables such as the containment approach, testing methods, and results reported are compiled, to illustrate the varying degrees to which these techniques are tested.
Industries and research utilizing genetically-engineered organisms are often subject to strict containment requirements such as physical isolation or specialized equipment to prevent an unintended escape. A relatively new field of research looks for ways to engineer intrinsic containment techniques- genetic safeguards that prevent an organism from surviving outside of specific conditions. As interest in this field has grown over the last few decades, researchers in molecular and synthetic biology have discovered many novel ways to accomplish this containment, but the current literature faces some ambiguity and overlap in the ways they describe various biocontainment methods. Additionally, the way publications report the robustness of the techniques they test is inconsistent, making it uncertain how regulators could assess the safety and efficacy of these methods if they are eventually to be used in practical, consumer applications. This project organizes and clarifies the descriptions of these techniques within an interactive flowchart, linking to definitions and references to publications on each within an Excel table. For each reference, variables such as the containment approach, testing methods, and results reported are compiled, to illustrate the varying degrees to which these techniques are tested.
Industries and research utilizing genetically-engineered organisms are often subject to strict containment requirements such as physical isolation or specialized equipment to prevent an unintended escape. A relatively new field of research looks for ways to engineer intrinsic containment techniques- genetic safeguards that prevent an organism from surviving outside of specific conditions. As interest in this field has grown over the last few decades, researchers in molecular and synthetic biology have discovered many novel ways to accomplish this containment, but the current literature faces some ambiguity and overlap in the ways they describe various biocontainment methods. Additionally, the way publications report the robustness of the techniques they test is inconsistent, making it uncertain how regulators could assess the safety and efficacy of these methods if they are eventually to be used in practical, consumer applications. This project organizes and clarifies the descriptions of these techniques within an interactive flowchart, linking to definitions and references to publications on each within an Excel table. For each reference, variables such as the containment approach, testing methods, and results reported are compiled, to illustrate the varying degrees to which these techniques are tested.