Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Genetic Engineering
- Creators: Harrington Bioengineering Program
Description
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a form of pancreatic cancer that affects the exocrine function of the pancreas. PDAC is often hard to diagnose and has shown to also be as difficult to treat. Xeroderma pigmentosum type B (XPB), is a protein can be found in Transcription Factor II Human (TFIIH). It is known to have ATP-ase and helicase activities. The ATP-ase activities could be used to regulate the transcription within super enhancer (SE) networks. Knocking out the ATP-ase activity in XPB in the same way that triptolide does would offer a more individualized therapeutic regiment. A loss of function mutation was tested to identify whether or not the mutation was present within the strand of DNA. In order to explore the role of XPB in pancreatic cancer, a knockout clone was made through the use of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology to induce a clone in exon 2 of XPB using a plasmid with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) selection marker. Once the clones were successfully made, they underwent testing through the use of a Surveyor Mutation Detection Kit for standard electrophoresis. The confirmation of a functional clone lead to GFP, which contained the mutation, being chosen for further testing be compared to the wild type GFP. After the GFP D54H mutation was chosen for further testing, it was then cultured from bacteria and wild type GFP and GFP D54H underwent a restriction enzyme digest. The digest resulted in showing that GFP and GFP D54H were the same on a larger level, and that one of the only ways to prove that the mutation was present was through amplification and analysis using the mutation detection kit.
ContributorsDelgado, Priscilla (Author) / Kiani, Samira (Thesis director) / Noel, Pawan (Committee member) / Harrington Bioengineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-05
Description
Genetic engineering, a development in science and technology that has enabled the genetic modification of crops among other organisms since the 1970s, has stirred heated debate among various stakeholders in the issue. This struggle is one consisting of two sides set in their own beliefs, refusing to even consider the validity of any opposition. As a result, it is difficult to establish common ground and attempt to develop policies and practices that can best suit all members involved while still being able to utilize a breakthrough technology in beneficial ways to society. This research project was conducted upon one particular case in the timeline of genetic modification of crops: the introduction of the Rainbow papaya in Hawaii in 1998 and its subsequent ramifications. The goal was to establish a more detailed understanding of the landscape of a debate that can appear to be based mainly upon the science of genetic engineering. Upon analysis of 22 news articles spanning the years 1999-2019 it was determined that the types of arguments themselves, both in favor of and against GM, fall into a wide range of categories that span much more than simply the science. Arguments both in favor and in opposition are nuanced and actually often seek similar end goals. There is potential to utilize these common goals and priorities in productive ways once stakeholders in the debate are aware of them. Finding commonalities will enable progress in the safe, effective implementation of a technology that has the potential to provide immense benefit in various ways in a manner that considers all perspectives involved.
ContributorsCartwright, Avery (Author) / Frow, Emma (Thesis director) / Bowman, Diana (Committee member) / Harrington Bioengineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-05
Description
When an individual is conceived there is a metaphorical roll of the dice. A game of chance is played with their genetics to which they cannot consent. Unlucky players could have inherited mild conditions such as chronic allergies to terrible diseases such as Cystic Fibrosis or Tay-Sachs. Controlling the genetics of an individual through the use of gene editing technology could be the key to ending this cycle of genetic diseases. Once detrimental diseases are now being cured through direct applications of genetic engineering. Even as we see the uses of genetic engineering technologies change the world, the more “sci-fi” applications have yet to be fully realized or explored. Editing hereditary genes before birth may have the ability to eliminate diseases from entire genetic lines, reduce the possibility for certain cancers and diseases, and perhaps even modify phenotypes in humans to create enhanced humans. Although this scientific field shows promise, it does have its reservations. Like any other scientific field, its ability to benefit humanity depends on its use.
ContributorsSchuler, Jacob (Co-author) / Silva, Anthony (Co-author) / Brian, Jennifer (Thesis director) / Ross, Christian (Committee member) / Harrington Bioengineering Program (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-05