Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
Filtering by
- All Subjects: robotics
Description
Automated driving systems are in an intensive research and development stage, and the companies developing these systems are targeting to deploy them on public roads in a very near future. Guaranteeing safe operation of these systems is crucial as they are planned to carry passengers and share the road with other vehicles and pedestrians. Yet, there is no agreed-upon approach on how and in what detail those systems should be tested. Different organizations have different testing approaches, and one common approach is to combine simulation-based testing with real-world driving.
One of the expectations from fully-automated vehicles is never to cause an accident. However, an automated vehicle may not be able to avoid all collisions, e.g., the collisions caused by other road occupants. Hence, it is important for the system designers to understand the boundary case scenarios where an autonomous vehicle can no longer avoid a collision. Besides safety, there are other expectations from automated vehicles such as comfortable driving and minimal fuel consumption. All safety and functional expectations from an automated driving system should be captured with a set of system requirements. It is challenging to create requirements that are unambiguous and usable for the design, testing, and evaluation of automated driving systems. Another challenge is to define useful metrics for assessing the testing quality because in general, it is impossible to test every possible scenario.
The goal of this dissertation is to formalize the theory for testing automated vehicles. Various methods for automatic test generation for automated-driving systems in simulation environments are presented and compared. The contributions presented in this dissertation include (i) new metrics that can be used to discover the boundary cases between safe and unsafe driving conditions, (ii) a new approach that combines combinatorial testing and optimization-guided test generation methods, (iii) approaches that utilize global optimization methods and random exploration to generate critical vehicle and pedestrian trajectories for testing purposes, (iv) a publicly-available simulation-based automated vehicle testing framework that enables application of the existing testing approaches in the literature, including the new approaches presented in this dissertation.
One of the expectations from fully-automated vehicles is never to cause an accident. However, an automated vehicle may not be able to avoid all collisions, e.g., the collisions caused by other road occupants. Hence, it is important for the system designers to understand the boundary case scenarios where an autonomous vehicle can no longer avoid a collision. Besides safety, there are other expectations from automated vehicles such as comfortable driving and minimal fuel consumption. All safety and functional expectations from an automated driving system should be captured with a set of system requirements. It is challenging to create requirements that are unambiguous and usable for the design, testing, and evaluation of automated driving systems. Another challenge is to define useful metrics for assessing the testing quality because in general, it is impossible to test every possible scenario.
The goal of this dissertation is to formalize the theory for testing automated vehicles. Various methods for automatic test generation for automated-driving systems in simulation environments are presented and compared. The contributions presented in this dissertation include (i) new metrics that can be used to discover the boundary cases between safe and unsafe driving conditions, (ii) a new approach that combines combinatorial testing and optimization-guided test generation methods, (iii) approaches that utilize global optimization methods and random exploration to generate critical vehicle and pedestrian trajectories for testing purposes, (iv) a publicly-available simulation-based automated vehicle testing framework that enables application of the existing testing approaches in the literature, including the new approaches presented in this dissertation.
ContributorsTuncali, Cumhur Erkan (Author) / Fainekos, Georgios (Thesis advisor) / Ben Amor, Heni (Committee member) / Kapinski, James (Committee member) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have the potential to significantly evolve transportation. AVs are expected to make transportation safer by avoiding accidents that happen due to human errors. When AVs become connected, they can exchange information with the infrastructure or other Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) to efficiently plan their future motion and therefore, increase the road throughput and reduce energy consumption. Cooperative algorithms for CAVs will not be deployed in real life unless they are proved to be safe, robust, and resilient to different failure models. Since intersections are crucial areas where most accidents happen, this dissertation first focuses on making existing intersection management algorithms safe and resilient against network and computation time, bounded model mismatches and external disturbances, and the existence of a rogue vehicle. Then, a generic algorithm for conflict resolution and cooperation of CAVs is proposed that ensures the safety of vehicles even when other vehicles suddenly change their plan. The proposed approach can also detect deadlock situations among CAVs and resolve them through a negotiation process. A testbed consisting of 1/10th scale model CAVs is built to evaluate the proposed algorithms. In addition, a simulator is developed to perform tests at a large scale. Results from the conducted experiments indicate the robustness and resilience of proposed approaches.
ContributorsKhayatian, Mohammad (Author) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Thesis advisor) / Fainekos, Georgios (Committee member) / Ben Amor, Heni (Committee member) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Lou, Yingyan (Committee member) / Iannucci, Bob (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
Autonomous systems should satisfy a set of requirements that guarantee their safety, efficiency, and reliability when working under uncertain circumstances. These requirements can have financial, or legal implications or they can describe what is assigned to autonomous systems.As a result, the system controller needs to be designed in order to comply with these - potentially complicated - requirements, and the closed-loop system needs to be tested and verified against these requirements.
However, when the complexity of the system and its requirements increases, designing a requirement-based controller for the system and analyzing the closed-loop system against the requirement becomes very challenging. In this case, existing design and test methodologies based on trial-and-error would fail, and hence disciplined scientific approaches should be considered.
To address some of these challenges, in this dissertation, I present different methods that facilitate efficient testing, and control design based on requirements:
1. Gradient-based methods for improved optimization-based testing,
2. Requirement-based learning for the design of neural-network controllers,
3. Methods based on barrier functions for designing control inputs that ensure the satisfaction of safety constraints.
ContributorsYaghoubi, Shakiba (Author) / Fainekos, Georgios (Thesis advisor) / Ben Amor, Heni (Committee member) / Bertsekas, Dimitri (Committee member) / Pedrielli, Giulia (Committee member) / Sankaranarayanan, Sriram (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021