Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Rehabilitation
Description
In rehabilitation settings, activity limitation can be a significant barrier to recovery. This study sought to examine the effects of state and trait level benefit finding, positive affect, and catastrophizing on activity limitation among individuals with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of either Osteoarthritis (OA), Fibromyalgia (FM), or a dual diagnosis of OA/FM. Participants (106 OA, 53 FM, and 101 OA/FM) who had no diagnosed autoimmune disorder, a pain rating above 20 on a 0-100 scale, and no involvement in litigation regarding their condition were recruited in the Phoenix metropolitan area for inclusion in the current study. After initial questionnaires were completed, participants were trained to complete daily diaries on a laptop computer and instructed to do so a half an hour before bed each night for 30 days. In each diary, participants rated their average daily pain, benefit finding, positive affect, catastrophizing, and activity limitation. A single item, "I thought about some of the good things that have come from living with my pain" was used to examine the broader construct of benefit finding. It was hypothesized that state and trait level benefit finding would have a direct relation with activity limitation and a partially mediated relationship, through positive affect. Multilevel modeling with SAS PROC MIXED revealed that benefit finding was not directly related to activity limitation. Increases in benefit finding were associated, however, with decreases in activity limitation through a significant mediated relationship with positive affect. Individuals who benefit find had a higher level of positive affect which was associated with decreased activity limitation. A suppression effect involving pain and benefit finding at the trait level was also found. Pain appeared to increase the predictive validity of the relation of benefit finding to activity limitation. These findings have important implications for rehabilitation psychologists and should embolden clinicians to encourage patients to increase positive affect by employing active approach-oriented coping strategies like benefit finding to reduce activity limitation.
ContributorsKinderdietz, Jeffrey Scott (Author) / Zautra, Alex (Thesis advisor) / Davis, Mary (Committee member) / Barrera, Manuel (Committee member) / Okun, Morris (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
Stroke occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients, thus causing brain cells to die. Stroke is the 5th leading cause of death in the United States and is one of the major causes of disability. Conventional therapy is a form of stroke rehabilitation generally consisting of physical and occupational therapy. It focuses on customized exercises based on the patient’s feedback. Physical therapy includes exercises such as weight bearing (affected arm), vibration of affected muscle and gravity-eliminated movement of affected arm. Overall physical therapy aims at strengthening muscle groups and aides in the relearning process. Occupational aspect of conventional therapy includes activities of daily living (ADL) such as dressing, self-feeding, grooming and toileting. Overall occupational therapy focuses on improving the daily activities performed by individuals. In comparison to conventional therapy, robotic therapy is relatively newer therapy. It uses robotic devices to perform repetitive motions and delivers high dosage and high intensity training to stroke patients. Based on the research studies reviewed, it is known that neuroplasticity in stroke patients is linked to interventions which are high in dosage, intensity, repetition, difficulty, salience. Peer-reviewed literature suggests robotic therapy might be a viable option for recovery in stroke patients. However, the extent to which robotic therapy may provide greater benefits than conventional therapy remains unclear. This thesis addresses the key components of a study design for comparing the efficacy of robotic therapy relative to conventional therapy to improve upper limb sensorimotor function in stroke survivors. The study design is based on an extensive review of the literature of stroke clinical trials and robotic therapy studies, analyses of the capabilities of a robotic therapy device (M2, Fourier Intelligence), and pilot data collected on healthy controls to create a pipeline of tasks and analyses to extract biomarkers of sensorimotor functional changes. This work has laid the foundation for a pilot longitudinal study that will be conducted at the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, where conventional and robotic therapy will be compared in a small cohort of stroke survivors.
ContributorsThomas, Lovein (Author) / Santello, Marco (Thesis advisor) / Kleim, Jeffrey (Committee member) / Maruyama, Trent (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021