This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students. 

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by

Clear all filters

151001-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In rehabilitation settings, activity limitation can be a significant barrier to recovery. This study sought to examine the effects of state and trait level benefit finding, positive affect, and catastrophizing on activity limitation among individuals with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of either Osteoarthritis (OA), Fibromyalgia (FM), or a dual diagnosis of

In rehabilitation settings, activity limitation can be a significant barrier to recovery. This study sought to examine the effects of state and trait level benefit finding, positive affect, and catastrophizing on activity limitation among individuals with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of either Osteoarthritis (OA), Fibromyalgia (FM), or a dual diagnosis of OA/FM. Participants (106 OA, 53 FM, and 101 OA/FM) who had no diagnosed autoimmune disorder, a pain rating above 20 on a 0-100 scale, and no involvement in litigation regarding their condition were recruited in the Phoenix metropolitan area for inclusion in the current study. After initial questionnaires were completed, participants were trained to complete daily diaries on a laptop computer and instructed to do so a half an hour before bed each night for 30 days. In each diary, participants rated their average daily pain, benefit finding, positive affect, catastrophizing, and activity limitation. A single item, "I thought about some of the good things that have come from living with my pain" was used to examine the broader construct of benefit finding. It was hypothesized that state and trait level benefit finding would have a direct relation with activity limitation and a partially mediated relationship, through positive affect. Multilevel modeling with SAS PROC MIXED revealed that benefit finding was not directly related to activity limitation. Increases in benefit finding were associated, however, with decreases in activity limitation through a significant mediated relationship with positive affect. Individuals who benefit find had a higher level of positive affect which was associated with decreased activity limitation. A suppression effect involving pain and benefit finding at the trait level was also found. Pain appeared to increase the predictive validity of the relation of benefit finding to activity limitation. These findings have important implications for rehabilitation psychologists and should embolden clinicians to encourage patients to increase positive affect by employing active approach-oriented coping strategies like benefit finding to reduce activity limitation.
ContributorsKinderdietz, Jeffrey Scott (Author) / Zautra, Alex (Thesis advisor) / Davis, Mary (Committee member) / Barrera, Manuel (Committee member) / Okun, Morris (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
154140-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Olecranon fractures account for approximately 10% of upper extremity fractures and 95% of them require surgical fixation. Most of the clinical, retrospective and biomechanical studies have supported plate fixation over other surgical fixation techniques since plates have demonstrated low incidence of reoperation, high fixation stability and resumption of activities of

Olecranon fractures account for approximately 10% of upper extremity fractures and 95% of them require surgical fixation. Most of the clinical, retrospective and biomechanical studies have supported plate fixation over other surgical fixation techniques since plates have demonstrated low incidence of reoperation, high fixation stability and resumption of activities of daily living (ADL) earlier. Thus far, biomechanical studies have been helpful in evaluating and comparing different plate fixation constructs based on fracture stability. However, they have not provided information that can be used to design rehabilitation protocols such as information that relates load at the hand with tendon tension or load at the interface between the plate and the bone. The set-ups used in biomechanical studies have included simple mechanical testing machines that either measured construct stiffness by cyclic loading the specimens or construct strength by performing ramp load until failure. Some biomechanical studies attempted to simulate tendon tension but the in-vivo tension applied to the tendon remains unknown. In this study, a novel procedure to test the olecranon fracture fixation using modern olecranon plates was developed to improve the biomechanical understanding of failures and to help determine the weights that can be safely lifted and the range of motion (ROM) that should be performed during rehabilitation procedures.

Design objectives were defined based on surgeon's feedback and analysis of unmet needs in the area of biomechanical testing. Four pilot cadaveric specimens were prepared to run on an upper extremity feedback controller and the set-up was validated based on the design objectives. Cadaveric specimen preparation included a series of steps such as dissection, suturing and potting that were standardized and improved iteratively after pilot testing. Additionally, a fracture and plating protocol was developed and fixture lengths were standardized based on anthropometric data. Results from the early pilot studies indicated shortcomings in the design, which was then iteratively refined for the subsequent studies. The final pilot study demonstrated that all of the design objectives were met. This system is planned for use in future studies that will assess olecranon fracture fixation and that will investigate the safety of rehabilitation protocols.
ContributorsJain, Saaransh (Author) / Abbas, James (Thesis advisor) / LaBelle, Jeffrey (Thesis advisor) / Jacofsky, Marc (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015