Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Resilience
Description
Sometimes difficult life events challenge our existing resources in such a way that routinized responses are inadequate to handle the challenge. Some individuals will persist in habitual, automatic behavior, regardless of environmental cues that indicate a mismatch between coping strategy and the demands of the stressor. Other individuals will marshal adaptive resources to construct new courses of action and reconceptualize the problem, associated goals and/or values. A mixed methods approach was used to describe and operationalize cognitive shift, a relatively unexplored construct in existing literature. The study was conducted using secondary data from a parent multi-year cross-sectional study of resilience with eight hundred mid-aged adults from the Phoenix metro area. Semi-structured telephone interviews were analyzed using a purposive sample (n=136) chosen by type of life event. Participants' beliefs, assumptions, and experiences were examined to understand how they shaped adaptation to adversity. An adaptive mechanism, "cognitive shift," was theorized as the transition from automatic coping to effortful cognitive processes aimed at novel resolution of issues. Aims included understanding when and how cognitive shift emerges and manifests. Cognitive shift was scored as a binary variable and triangulated through correlational and logistic regression analyses. Interaction effects revealed that positive personality attributes influence cognitive shift most when people suffered early adversity. This finding indicates that a certain complexity, self-awareness and flexibility of mind may lead to a greater capacity to find meaning in adversity. This work bridges an acknowledged gap in literature and provides new insights into resilience.
ContributorsRivers, Crystal T (Author) / Zautra, Alex (Thesis advisor) / Davis, Mary (Committee member) / Kurpius, Sharon (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
Depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts or actions are on the rise in adolescents (National Institute of Mental Health, 2015; Bridge, Asti, & Horowitz, 2015). Parents, school administrators, and therapists are searching for resiliency factors with in at-risk groups to aid students in need. In previous work, Luthar and Zigler (1992) reported that intelligent youth are more resilient than less intelligent youth under low stress conditions but they lose their advantage under high stress conditions. This study examined whether intelligence (reflected in grade point average; GPA) and maladaptive (internalizing and externalizing symptoms) behaviors are negatively related in adolescents, and tested whether level of stress, reflected in emotion regulation and friendship quality, moderated that association. It also probed whether the relationships differ by gender. Sixth-graders (N=506) were recruited with active parental consent from three middle schools. Adolescents completed self-report questionnaires Regarding demo graphics, maladaptive behaviors, emotion regulation, and friendship quality, and GPA data were collected from the school. Regression analyses found that GPA was negatively related to externalizing symptoms. Girls with poor friendship communication report significantly higher maladaptive behaviors. This relation was more pronounced for girls with high GPAs, as predicted. Results support the theory that intelligent female adolescents are more reactive under adverse circumstances. Future efforts should follow students through middle school into high school to evaluate whether friendships remain important to adjustment, hold for boys as well as girls, and have implications for relationship interventions.
ContributorsGonzales, Ashlyn Carol (Author) / Luthar, Suniya (Thesis director) / Davis, Mary (Committee member) / Infurna, Frank (Committee member) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-12
Description
Our children come to school every day to learn, participate, and prepare for what the future will bring. Others come to school to find refuge and help from those who dedicate their lives to ensure they are well and safe. They come with their minds filled with hopes and dreams, while others walk around the hallways with their hearts filled with despair and uncertainty. Despite collaborative district efforts and improvements in student services, students continue to experience trauma related symptoms and other mental disorders at disconcerting rates. The school district reports that approximately 98% of students have experienced traumatic episodes and half of these students presented with significant distress from symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Loudenback, 2016). At this school, approximately 25% of the student body has been referred, identified and treated for socio-emotional difficulties. These rates are often higher in students with learning disabilities participating in different academic programs. This action research study was conducted to evaluate how and to what extent does implementation of a resilience-based curriculum affect students’ resilience, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms, attitudes toward school and efficacy for coping. This project was implemented over ten consecutive weeks in an urban middle school in East Los Angeles to a group of twenty students in special education. The intervention consists of ten modules each with activities and strategies designed to raise the students’ resilience and overall well-being. Resilience Theory and Social Cognitive Theory provide the framework for understanding the problem of practice and informing the intervention. Research along with professional observations regarding the vulnerability of students in special education coupled with the lack of evidence-based practices that assist in their emotional development inspired this project. This action research relied on an explanatory sequential design where qualitative results explained and supported the results from the quantitative data. Following the explanatory design, quantitative data was collected analyzed followed by qualitative data upon completion of the intervention. Data collected from web-based surveys and focus groups demonstrate that their participation in the resilience-based intervention increased their resilience, more specifically self-efficacy and problem solving skills while reducing PTSD symptoms. Results also showed students improved their attitudes toward school and ability to cope with stress. Quantitative and qualitative data merging, interpretation, and relation to both theory and research are discussed along with the study’s limitations, implication for research and practice, and concluding thoughts.
ContributorsDussan, Francisco Jose (Author) / Gee, Elizabeth (Thesis advisor) / Wolf, Leigh (Committee member) / Elsasser, Jim (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021