Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Environmental engineering
- Creators: Muenich, Rebecca
Description
The United States Department of Agriculture provides requirements for a farm operation to become certified organic, but how do these regulations influence nutrient
management on organic farms? There is insufficient evidence to show if the current
regulations on nutrient sourcing and application are feasible and effective. An online
survey was administered to owners and operators of organic farms. Survey respondents
were offered a free soil test as an incentive to participate and to compare their practices
and soil quality. Assessing the current nutrient management under organic regulations
provides information to help assess the sustainability of their nutrient management
practices. Early data suggest that organic farmers may most often be overapplying and
creating legacy sources with this key resource.
ContributorsBonham, Emma Eileen (Author) / Muenich, Rebecca (Thesis advisor) / Zanin, Alaina (Committee member) / Williams, Clinton (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Water reuse and nutrient recovery are long-standing strategies employed in agricultural systems. This is especially true in dry climates where water is scarce, and soils do not commonly contain the nutrients or organic matter to sustain natural crop growth. Agriculture accounts for approximately 70% of all freshwater withdrawals globally. This essential sector of society therefore plays an important role in ensuring water sources are maintained and that the food system can remain resilient to dwindling water resources. The purpose of this research is to quantify the benefits of organic residuals and reclaimed water use in agriculture in arid environments through the development of a systematic review and case study. Data from the systematic review was extracted to be applied to a case study identifying the viability and benefits of organic residuals on arid agriculture. Results show that the organic residuals investigated do have quantitative benefits to agriculture such as improving soil health, reducing the need for conventional fertilizers, and reducing irrigation needs from freshwater sources. Some studies found reclaimed water sources to be of better quality than local freshwater sources due to environmental factors. Biosolids and manure are the most concentrated of the organic residuals, providing nutrient inputs and enhancing long-term soil health. A conceptual model is presented to demonstrate the quantitative benefits of using a reclaimed water source in Pinal County, Arizona on a hypothetical crop of cotton. A goal of the model is to take implied nutrient inputs from reclaimed water sources and quantify them against standard practice of using irrigated groundwater and conventional fertilizers on agricultural operations. Pinal County is an important case study area where farmers are facing cuts to their water resources amid a prolonged drought in the Colorado River Basin. The model shows that a reclaimed water source would be able to offset all freshwater and conventional fertilizer use, but salinity in reclaimed water sources would force a need for additional irrigation in the form of a large leaching fraction. This review combined with the case study demonstrate the potential for nutrient and water reuse, while highlighting potential barriers to address.
ContributorsKrukowski, William Lee (Author) / Muenich, Rebecca (Thesis advisor) / Williams, Clinton (Committee member) / Hamilton, Kerry (Committee member) / Fox, Peter (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
De facto potable reuse (DFR) occurs when surface water sources at drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) contain treated effluents from upstream wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs) originate from treated effluents (e.g., unregulated disinfection by-products, pathogenic microorganisms as Cryptosporidium oocyst, Giardia cyst, and Norovirus) can be present in surface water and pose human health risks linked to CECs. Previously developed De facto Reuse Incidence in our Nations Consumable Supply (DRINCS) model predicted DFR for the national largest DWTPs that serve >10,000 people (N = 2,056 SW intakes at 1,210 DWTPs). The dissertation aims to quantify DFR at all surface water intakes for smaller DWTPs serving ≤10,000 people across the United States and develop a programmed ArcGIS tool for proximity analysis between upstream WWTPs and DWTPs. The tested hypothesis is whether DWTPs serving ≤10,000 people are more likely to be impacted by DFR than larger systems serving > 10,000 people.The original DRINCS model was expanded to include all smaller DWTPs (N = 6,045 SW intakes at 3,984 DWTPs) in the U.S. First, results for Texas predicted that two-thirds of all SW intakes were impacted by at least one WWTP upstream. The level of DFR at SW intakes in Texas ranged between 1% to 20% under average flow and exceeded 90% during mild droughts. Smaller DWTPs in Texas had a higher frequency of DFR than larger systems while < 10% of these DWTPs employed advanced technology (AT) capable of removing CECs. Second, nationally over 40% of surface water intakes at all DWTPs were impacted by DFR under average flow (2,917 of 6,826). Smaller DWTPs had a higher frequency (1,504 and 1,413, respectively) of being impacted by upstream WWTP discharges than larger DWTPs. Third, the difference in DFR levels at smaller versus larger DWTPs was statistically unclear (t-test, p = 0.274). Smaller communities could have high risks to CECs as they rely on surface water from lower-order streams impacted by DFR. Furthermore, smaller DWTPs lack more than twice as advanced unit processes as larger DWTPs with 52.1% and 23%, respectively. DFR levels for DWTPs serving > 10,000 people were statistically higher on mid-size order streams (3, 5, and 8) than those for smaller DWTPs. Finally, DWTPs serving > 10,000 people could pose risks to a population impacted by DFR > 1% as 40 times as those served by smaller DWTPs with 71 million and 1.7 million people, respectively. The total exposed population to risks of CECs served by DWTPs impacted by upstream WWTP discharges (DFR >10%) was estimated at 12.3 million people in the United States. Future studies can use DRINCS results to conduct an epidemiological risk assessment for impacted communities and identify communities that would benefit from advanced technology to remove CECs.
ContributorsNguyen, Thuy Thi Thu (Author) / Westerhoff, Paul K (Thesis advisor) / Hristovski, Kiril (Committee member) / Fox, Peter (Committee member) / Muenich, Rebecca (Committee member) / Quay, Ray (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020