Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes both ASU Theses and Dissertations, submitted by graduate students, and the Barrett, Honors College theses submitted by undergraduate students.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Environmental engineering
- Creators: Garcia, Margaret
Description
Approximately 71% of the great lakes, lakes, reservoirs, and ponds, together with 51% of rivers and streams assessed in the US are impaired or threatened by pollution or do not meet the minimum water quality requirements. Pathogens, sediments, and nutrients are leading causes of impairment, with agriculture being a top source of pollution. Agricultural pollution has become a global concern overtaking urban contamination as the major factor of inland and coastal waters degradation in many parts of the world. High-yielding crop production has been achieved by the intensive use of inorganic fertilizers that are mainly composed of Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P). N and P are essential nutrients for ecosystem structure, processes, and functions. However, N and P in excess can be problematic to the environment. One of the major impacts of the increasing amount of these nutrients in the environment is the global expansion of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Major agricultural nutrient pollution sources and climate change can exacerbate these risks. This dissertation aims to guide future policies to mitigate issues linked to excess nutrient loads in the U.S. by evaluating the impact of climate change on nutrient loads and assessing the environmental impact as well as the spatial patterns of one of the major agricultural sources of nutrient pollution - Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). Specifically, I first investigated the impact of bias correction techniques when modeling mid-century nutrient loads in a watershed heavily impacted by CAFOs. Second, I evaluated the role of CAFOs in land use change and subsequent environmental degradation of the surrounding environment. Finally, I assessed the spatial organization of CAFOs and its links to water quality conditions. The findings revealed unique insights for future nutrient management strategies in the U.S.
ContributorsMiralha, Lorrayne (Author) / Muenich, Rebecca L. (Thesis advisor) / Garcia, Margaret (Committee member) / Xu, Tianfang (Committee member) / Myint, Soe W. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
Traditional infrastructure design approaches were born with industrialization. During this time the relatively stable environments allowed infrastructure systems to reliably provide service with networks designed to precise parameters and organizations fixated on maximizing efficiency. Now, infrastructure systems face the challenge of operating in the Anthropocene, an era of complexity. The environments in which infrastructure systems operate are changing more rapidly than the technologies and governance systems of infrastructure. Infrastructure systems will need to be resilient to navigate stability and instability and avoid obsolescence. This dissertation addresses how infrastructure systems could be designed for the Anthropocene, assessing technologies able to operate with uncertainty, rethinking the principles of technology design, and restructuring infrastructure governance. Resilience, in engineering, has often been defined as resistance to known disturbances with a focus on infrastructure assets. Resilience, more broadly reviewed, includes resistance, adaptation, and transformation across physical and governance domains. This dissertation constructs a foundation for resilient infrastructure through an assessment of resilience paradigms in engineering, complexity and deep uncertainty (Chapter 2), ecology (Chapter 3), and organizational change and leadership (Chapter 4). The second chapter reconciles frameworks of complexity and deep uncertainty to help infrastructure managers navigate the instability infrastructure systems face, with a focus on climate change. The third chapter identifies competencies of resilience in infrastructure theory and practice and compares those competencies with ‘Life’s Principles’ in ecology, presenting opportunities for growth and innovation in infrastructure resilience and highlighting the need for satisficed (to satisfy and suffice) solutions. The fourth chapter navigates pressures of exploitation and exploration that infrastructure institutions face during periods of stability and instability, proposing leadership capabilities to enhance institutional resilience. Finally, the dissertation is concluded with a chapter synthesizing the previous chapters, providing guidance for alternative design approaches for advancing resilient infrastructure. Combined, the work challenges the basic mental models used by engineers when approaching infrastructure design and recommends new ways of doing and thinking for the accelerating and increasingly uncertain conditions of the future.
ContributorsHelmrich, Alysha Marie (Author) / Chester, Mikhail V (Thesis advisor) / Grimm, Nancy B (Committee member) / Garcia, Margaret (Committee member) / Meerow, Sara (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021