ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
The second flow that was created was used to put together a flash block that is based off of a XILIX XCFXXP. This flow was somewhat similar to how the pad ring flow worked except that optimizations and a clock tree was added into the flow. There was a couple of design redoes due to timing and orientation constraints.
Finally, the last flow that was created was the top level flow which is where all of the components are combined together to create a finished test chip ready for fabrication. The main components that were used were the finished flash block, HERMES, test structures, and a clock instance along with the pad ring flow for the creation of the pad ring and power ring.
Also discussed is some work that was done on a previous multi-project test chip. The work that was done was the creation of power gaters that were used like switches to turn the power on and off for some flash modules. To control the power gaters the functionality change of some pad drivers was done so that they output a higher voltage than what is seen in the core of the chip.
In addition, a preliminary experimental setup for calibration tests on ultrasensitive PDMS cantilever beams is reported. One loading and unloading cycle is completed on a microcantilever PDMS beam (theoretical stiffness 0.5 pN/ µm). Beam deflections are actuated by adjusting the buoyancy force on the beam, which is submerged in water, by the addition of heat. The expected loading and unloading curve is produced, albeit with significant noise. The experimental results indicate that the beam stiffness is a factor of six larger than predicted theoretically. One probable explanation is that the beam geometry may change when it is removed from the channel after curing, making assumptions about the beam geometry used in the theoretical analysis inaccurate. This theory is bolstered by experimental data discussed in the report. Other sources of error which could partially contribute to the divergent results are discussed. Improvements to the experimental setup for future work are suggested.