Barrett

Barrett, The Honors College at Arizona State University proudly showcases the work of undergraduate honors students by sharing this collection exclusively with the ASU community.

Barrett accepts high performing, academically engaged undergraduate students and works with them in collaboration with all of the other academic units at Arizona State University. All Barrett students complete a thesis or creative project which is an opportunity to explore an intellectual interest and produce an original piece of scholarly research. The thesis or creative project is supervised and defended in front of a faculty committee. Students are able to engage with professors who are nationally recognized in their fields and committed to working with honors students. Completing a Barrett thesis or creative project is an opportunity for undergraduate honors students to contribute to the ASU academic community in a meaningful way.

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Filtering by

Clear all filters

132448-Thumbnail Image.png

Separation of Gases From Biomass

Description
The solid municipal waste contains approximately 60% of organic matter and after varying temperature, pressure and residence time as factors, the temperature influenced the yield at least twice more than the residence time. The pressure had the least effect on the production of the syngas. Different types of hydrogen separation…

The solid municipal waste contains approximately 60% of organic matter and after varying temperature, pressure and residence time as factors, the temperature influenced the yield at least twice more than the residence time. The pressure had the least effect on the production of the syngas. Different types of hydrogen separation were explored ranging from pressure swing adsorption (PSA) to water splitting, factional/cryogenic method and then hydrogen selective membranes. The membranes were found to be more cost efficient, and easily accessible and fabricated and produced purer hydrogen gas. The different membranes were explored, and their different characteristics were explored, and a decision matrix showed that the polymeric membrane was 1.37 time better than microporous membrane and 1.54 times better than dense metal membrane.
ContributorsAgbo, Benjamin Udama (Co-author) / Buyinza, Allan (Co-author) / Deng, Shuaguang (Thesis director) / Taylor, David (Committee member) / Materials Science and Engineering Program (Contributor) / Chemical Engineering Program (Contributor, Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-05