ASU Scholarship Showcase

Background: Opioid peptides, including dynorphin A, besides their analgesic action in the nervous system, exert a broad spectrum of effects on cells of the immune system, including leukocyte migration, degranulation and cytokine production. The mechanisms whereby opioid peptides induce leukocyte responses are poorly understood. The integrin Mac-1 (alpha(M)beta(2), CD11b/CD18) is a multiligand receptor which mediates numerous reactions of neutrophils and monocyte/macrophages during the immune-inflammatory response. Our recent elucidation of the ligand recognition specificity of Mac-1 suggested that dynorphin A and dynorphin B contain Mac-1 recognition motifs and can potentially interact with this receptor.

Results: In this study, we have synthesized the peptide library spanning the sequence of dynorphin AB, containing dynorphin A and B, and showed that the peptides bound recombinant alpha I-M-domain, the ligand binding region of Mac-1. In addition, immobilized dynorphins A and B supported adhesion of the Mac-1-expressing cells. In binding to dynorphins A and B, Mac-1 cooperated with cell surface proteoglycans since both anti-Mac-1 function-blocking reagents and heparin were required to block adhesion. Further focusing on dynorphin A, we showed that its interaction with the alpha I-M-domain was activation independent as both the alpha 7 helix-truncated (active conformation) and helix-extended (nonactive conformation) alpha I-M-domains efficiently bound dynorphin A. Dynorphin A induced a potent migratory response of Mac-1-expressing, but not Mac-1-deficient leukocytes, and enhanced Mac-1-mediated phagocytosis of latex beads by murine IC-21 macrophages.

Conclusions: Together, the results identify dynorphins A and B as novel ligands for Mac-1 and suggest a role for the Dynorphin A-Mac-1 interactions in the induction of nonopiod receptor-dependent effects in leukocytes.

The broad recognition specificity exhibited by integrin α_Mβ₂ (Mac-1, CD11b/CD18) has allowed this adhesion receptor to play innumerable roles in leukocyte biology, yet we know little about how and why α_Mβ₂ binds its multiple ligands. Within α_Mβ₂, the α_MI-domain is responsible for integrin’s multiligand binding properties. To identify its recognition motif, we screened peptide libraries spanning sequences of many known protein ligands for α_MI-domain binding and also selected the α_M I-domain recognition sequences by phage display. Analyses of >1400 binding and nonbinding peptides derived from peptide libraries showed that a key feature of the α_MI-domain recognition motif is a small core consisting of basic amino acids flanked by hydrophobic residues. Furthermore, the peptides selected by phage display conformed to a similar pattern. Identification of the recognition motif allowed the construction of an algorithm that reliably predicts the α_MI-domain binding sites in the α_Mβ₂ ligands. The recognition specificity of the α_MI-domain resembles that of some chaperones, which allows it to bind segments exposed in unfolded proteins. The disclosure of the α_Mβ₂ binding preferences allowed the prediction that cationic host defense peptides, which are strikingly enriched in the α_MI-domain recognition motifs, represent a new class of α_Mβ₂ ligands. This prediction has been tested by examining the interaction of α_Mβ₂ with the human cathelicidin peptide LL-37. LL-37 induced a potent α_Mβ₂-dependent cell migratory response and caused activation of α_Mβ₂ on neutrophils. The newly revealed recognition specificity of α_Mβ₂ toward unfolded protein segments and cationic proteins and peptides suggests that α_Mβ₂ may serve as a previously proposed “alarmin” receptor with important roles in innate host defense.

The aim of this article was to study sound source localization by cochlear implant (CI) listeners with low-frequency (LF) acoustic hearing in both the operated ear and in the contralateral ear. Eight CI listeners had symmetrical LF acoustic hearing and 4 had asymmetrical LF acoustic hearing. The effects of two variables were assessed: (i) the symmetry of the LF thresholds in the two ears and (ii) the presence/absence of bilateral acoustic amplification. Stimuli consisted of low-pass, high-pass, and wideband noise bursts presented in the frontal horizontal plane. Localization accuracy was 23° of error for the symmetrical listeners and 76° of error for the asymmetrical listeners. The presence of a unilateral CI used in conjunction with bilateral LF acoustic hearing does not impair sound source localization accuracy, but amplification for acoustic hearing can be detrimental to sound source localization accuracy.