This growing collection consists of scholarly works authored by ASU-affiliated faculty, staff, and community members, and it contains many open access articles. ASU-affiliated authors are encouraged to Share Your Work in KEEP.

Displaying 201 - 202 of 202
Filtering by

Clear all filters

129155-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

The impetus for discovery and evaluation of protein biomarkers has been accelerated by recent development of advanced technologies for rapid and broad proteome analyses. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based protein assays hold great potential for in vitro biomarker studies. Described here is the development of a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA) for

The impetus for discovery and evaluation of protein biomarkers has been accelerated by recent development of advanced technologies for rapid and broad proteome analyses. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based protein assays hold great potential for in vitro biomarker studies. Described here is the development of a multiplex mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA) for quantification of apolipoprotein C-I (apoC-I), apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II), apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) and their proteoforms. The multiplex MSIA assay was fast (∼40 min) and high-throughput (96 samples at a time). The assay was applied to a small cohort of human plasma samples, revealing the existence of multiple proteoforms for each apolipoprotein C. The quantitative aspect of the assay enabled determination of the concentration for each proteoform individually. Low-abundance proteoforms, such as fucosylated apoC-III, were detected in less than 20% of the samples. The distribution of apoC-III proteoforms varied among samples with similar total apoC-III concentrations. The multiplex analysis of the three apolipoproteins C and their proteoforms using quantitative MSIA represents a significant step forward toward better understanding of their physiological roles in health and disease.

ContributorsTrenchevska, Olgica (Author) / Schaab, Matthew (Author) / Nelson, Randall (Author) / Nedelkov, Dobrin (Author) / Biodesign Institute (Contributor)
Created2015-06-15
129141-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Traditionally, hazardous chemicals have been regulated in the U.S. on a one-by-one basis, an approach that is slow, expensive and can be inefficient, as illustrated by a decades-long succession of replacing one type of organohalogen flame retardants (OHFRs) with another one, without addressing the root cause of toxicity and associated

Traditionally, hazardous chemicals have been regulated in the U.S. on a one-by-one basis, an approach that is slow, expensive and can be inefficient, as illustrated by a decades-long succession of replacing one type of organohalogen flame retardants (OHFRs) with another one, without addressing the root cause of toxicity and associated public health threats posed. The present article expounds on the need for efficient monitoring strategies and pragmatic steps in reducing environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts. A promising approach is to combine specific bioassays with state-of-the-art chemical screening to identify chemicals and chemical mixtures sharing specific modes of action (MOAs) and pathways of toxicity (PoTs). This approach could be used to identify and regulate hazardous chemicals as classes or compound families, featuring similar biological end-points, such as endocrine disruption and mutagenicity. Opportunities and potential obstacles of implementing this approach are discussed.

ContributorsVenkatesan, Arjunkrishna (Author) / Halden, Rolf (Author) / Biodesign Institute (Contributor)
Created2015-08-28