This growing collection consists of scholarly works authored by ASU-affiliated faculty, staff, and community members, and it contains many open access articles. ASU-affiliated authors are encouraged to Share Your Work in KEEP.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 24
Filtering by

Clear all filters

128360-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

We recommend using backward design to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). The defining hallmark of CUREs is that students in a formal lab course explore research questions with unknown answers that are broadly relevant outside the course. Because CUREs lead to novel research findings, they represent a unique course

We recommend using backward design to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). The defining hallmark of CUREs is that students in a formal lab course explore research questions with unknown answers that are broadly relevant outside the course. Because CUREs lead to novel research findings, they represent a unique course design challenge, as the dual nature of these courses requires course designers to consider two distinct, but complementary, sets of goals for the CURE: 1) scientific discovery milestones (i.e., research goals) and 2) student learning in cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains (i.e., pedagogical goals). As more undergraduate laboratory courses are re-imagined as CUREs, how do we thoughtfully design these courses to effectively meet both sets of goals? In this Perspectives article, we explore this question and outline recommendations for using backward design in CURE development.

ContributorsCooper, Katelyn (Author) / Soneral, Paula A. G. (Author) / Brownell, Sara (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2017-05-26
Description

Background: The shift from solitary to social behavior is one of the major evolutionary transitions. Primitively eusocial bumblebees are uniquely placed to illuminate the evolution of highly eusocial insect societies. Bumblebees are also invaluable natural and agricultural pollinators, and there is widespread concern over recent population declines in some species. High-quality

Background: The shift from solitary to social behavior is one of the major evolutionary transitions. Primitively eusocial bumblebees are uniquely placed to illuminate the evolution of highly eusocial insect societies. Bumblebees are also invaluable natural and agricultural pollinators, and there is widespread concern over recent population declines in some species. High-quality genomic data will inform key aspects of bumblebee biology, including susceptibility to implicated population viability threats.

Results: We report the high quality draft genome sequences of Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens, two ecologically dominant bumblebees and widely utilized study species. Comparing these new genomes to those of the highly eusocial honeybee Apis mellifera and other Hymenoptera, we identify deeply conserved similarities, as well as novelties key to the biology of these organisms. Some honeybee genome features thought to underpin advanced eusociality are also present in bumblebees, indicating an earlier evolution in the bee lineage. Xenobiotic detoxification and immune genes are similarly depauperate in bumblebees and honeybees, and multiple categories of genes linked to social organization, including development and behavior, show high conservation. Key differences identified include a bias in bumblebee chemoreception towards gustation from olfaction, and striking differences in microRNAs, potentially responsible for gene regulation underlying social and other traits.

Conclusions: These two bumblebee genomes provide a foundation for post-genomic research on these key pollinators and insect societies. Overall, gene repertoires suggest that the route to advanced eusociality in bees was mediated by many small changes in many genes and processes, and not by notable expansion or depauperation.

ContributorsSadd, Ben M. (Author) / Barribeau, Seth M. (Author) / Bloch, Guy (Author) / de Graaf, Dirk C. (Author) / Dearden, Peter (Author) / Elsik, Christine G. (Author) / Gadau, Juergen (Author) / Grimmelikhuijzen, Cornelis J. P. (Author) / Hasselmann, Martin (Author) / Lozier, Jeffrey D. (Author) / Robertson, Hugh M. (Author) / Smagghe, Guy (Author) / Stolle, Eckart (Author) / Van Vaerenbergh, Matthias (Author) / Waterhouse, Robert M. (Author) / Bornberg-Bauer, Erich (Author) / Klasberg, Steffen (Author) / Bennett, Anna K. (Author) / Camara, Francisco (Author) / Guigo, Roderic (Author) / Hoff, Katharina (Author) / Mariotti, Marco (Author) / Munoz-Torres, Monica (Author) / Murphy, Terence (Author) / Santesmasses, Didac (Author) / Amdam, Gro (Author) / Beckers, Matthew (Author) / Beye, Martin (Author) / Biewer, Matthias (Author) / Bitondi, Marcia MG (Author) / Blaxter, Mark L. (Author) / Bourke, Andrew FG (Author) / Brown, Mark JF (Author) / Buechel, Severine D. (Author) / Cameron, Rossanah (Author) / Cappelle, Kaat (Author) / Carolan, James C. (Author) / Christiaens, Olivier (Author) / Ciborowski, Kate L. (Author) / Clarke, David F. (Author) / Colgan, Thomas J. (Author) / Collins, David H. (Author) / Cridge, Andrew G. (Author) / Dalmay, Tamas (Author) / Dreier, Stephanie (Author) / du Plessis, Louis (Author) / Duncan, Elizabeth (Author) / Erler, Silvio (Author) / Evans, Jay (Author) / Falcon, Talgo (Author) / Flores, Kevin (Author) / Freitas, Flavia CP (Author) / Fuchikawa, Taro (Author) / Gempe, Tanja (Author) / Hartfelder, Klaus (Author) / Hauser, Frank (Author) / Helbing, Sophie (Author) / Humann, Fernanda (Author) / Irvine, Frano (Author) / Jermiin, Lars S (Author) / Johnson, Claire E. (Author) / Johnson, Reed M (Author) / Jones, Andrew K. (Author) / Kadowaki, Tatsuhiko (Author) / Kidner, Jonathan H. (Author) / Koch, Vasco (Author) / Kohler, Arian (Author) / Kraus, F. Bernhard (Author) / Lattorff, H. Michael G. (Author) / Leask, Megan (Author) / Lockett, Gabrielle A. (Author) / Mallon, Eamonn B. (Author) / Marco Antonio, David S. (Author) / Marxer, Monika (Author) / Meeus, Ivan (Author) / Moritz, Robin FA (Author) / Nair, Ajay (Author) / Napflin, Kathrin (Author) / Nissen, Inga (Author) / Niu, Jinzhi (Author) / Nunes, Francis MF (Author) / Oakeshott, John G. (Author) / Osborne, Amy (Author) / Otte, Marianne (Author) / Pinheiro, Daniel G. (Author) / Rossie, Nina (Author) / Rueppell, Olav (Author) / Santos, Carolina G (Author) / Schmid-Hempel, Regula (Author) / Schmitt, Bjorn D. (Author) / Schulte, Christina (Author) / Simoes, Zila LP (Author) / Soares, Michelle PM (Author) / Swevers, Luc (Author) / Winnebeck, Eva C. (Author) / Wolschin, Florian (Author) / Yu, Na (Author) / Zdobnov, Evgeny M (Author) / Aqrawi, Peshtewani K (Author) / Blakenburg, Kerstin P (Author) / Coyle, Marcus (Author) / Francisco, Liezl (Author) / Hernandez, Alvaro G. (Author) / Holder, Michael (Author) / Hudson, Matthew E. (Author) / Jackson, LaRonda (Author) / Jayaseelan, Joy (Author) / Joshi, Vandita (Author) / Kovar, Christie (Author) / Lee, Sandra L. (Author) / Mata, Robert (Author) / Mathew, Tittu (Author) / Newsham, Irene F. (Author) / Ngo, Robin (Author) / Okwuonu, Geoffrey (Author) / Pham, Christopher (Author) / Pu, Ling-Ling (Author) / Saada, Nehad (Author) / Santibanez, Jireh (Author) / Simmons, DeNard (Author) / Thornton, Rebecca (Author) / Venkat, Aarti (Author) / Walden, Kimberly KO (Author) / Wu, Yuan-Qing (Author) / Debyser, Griet (Author) / Devreese, Bart (Author) / Asher, Claire (Author) / Blommaert, Julie (Author) / Chipman, Ariel D. (Author) / Chittka, Lars (Author) / Fouks, Bertrand (Author) / Liu, Jisheng (Author) / O'Neill, Meaghan P (Author) / Sumner, Seirian (Author) / Puiu, Daniela (Author) / Qu, Jiaxin (Author) / Salzberg, Steven L (Author) / Scherer, Steven E (Author) / Muzny, Donna M. (Author) / Richards, Stephen (Author) / Robinson, Gene E (Author) / Gibbs, Richard A. (Author) / Schmid-Hempel, Paul (Author) / Worley, Kim C (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2015-04-24
Description

We present a phylogeographic study of at least six reproductively isolated lineages of new world harvester ants within the Pogonomyrmex barbatus and P. rugosus species group. The genetic and geographic relationships within this clade are complex: Four of the identified lineages show genetic caste determination (GCD) and are divided into

We present a phylogeographic study of at least six reproductively isolated lineages of new world harvester ants within the Pogonomyrmex barbatus and P. rugosus species group. The genetic and geographic relationships within this clade are complex: Four of the identified lineages show genetic caste determination (GCD) and are divided into two pairs. Each pair has evolved under a mutualistic system that necessitates sympatry. These paired lineages are dependent upon one another because their GCD requires interlineage matings for the production of F1 hybrid workers, and intralineage matings are required to produce queens. This GCD system maintains genetic isolation among these interdependent lineages, while simultaneously requiring co-expansion and emigration as their distributions have changed over time. It has also been demonstrated that three of these four GCD lineages have undergone historical hybridization, but the narrower sampling range of previous studies has left questions on the hybrid parentage, breadth, and age of these groups. Thus, reconstructing the phylogenetic and geographic history of this group allows us to evaluate past insights and hypotheses and to plan future inquiries in a more complete historical biogeographic context. Using mitochondrial DNA sequences sampled across most of the morphospecies’ ranges in the U.S.A. and Mexico, we conducted a detailed phylogeographic study. Remarkably, our results indicate that one of the GCD lineage pairs has experienced a dramatic range expansion, despite the genetic load and fitness costs of the GCD system. Our analyses also reveal a complex pattern of vicariance and dispersal in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants that is largely concordant with models of late Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene range shifts among various arid-adapted taxa in North America.

ContributorsMott, Brendon (Author) / Gadau, Juergen (Author) / Anderson, Kirk E. (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2015-07-01
128826-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Women who start college in one of the natural or physical sciences leave in greater proportions than their male peers. The reasons for this difference are complex, and one possible contributing factor is the social environment women experience in the classroom. Using social network analysis, we explore how gender influences

Women who start college in one of the natural or physical sciences leave in greater proportions than their male peers. The reasons for this difference are complex, and one possible contributing factor is the social environment women experience in the classroom. Using social network analysis, we explore how gender influences the confidence that college-level biology students have in each other’s mastery of biology. Results reveal that males are more likely than females to be named by peers as being knowledgeable about the course content. This effect increases as the term progresses, and persists even after controlling for class performance and outspokenness. The bias in nominations is specifically due to males over-nominating their male peers relative to their performance. The over-nomination of male peers is commensurate with an overestimation of male grades by 0.57 points on a 4 point grade scale, indicating a strong male bias among males when assessing their classmates. Females, in contrast, nominated equitably based on student performance rather than gender, suggesting they lacked gender biases in filling out these surveys. These trends persist across eleven surveys taken in three different iterations of the same Biology course. In every class, the most renowned students are always male. This favoring of males by peers could influence student self-confidence, and thus persistence in this STEM discipline.

ContributorsGrunspan, Daniel Z. (Author) / Eddy, Sarah L. (Author) / Brownell, Sara (Author) / Wiggins, Benjamin L. (Author) / Crowe, Alison J. (Author) / Goodreau, Steven M. (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2016-02-10
128801-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Cancer therapy selects for cancer cells resistant to treatment, a process that is fundamentally evolutionary. To what extent, however, is the evolutionary perspective employed in research on therapeutic resistance and relapse? We analyzed 6,228 papers on therapeutic resistance and/or relapse in cancers and found that the use of evolution terms

Cancer therapy selects for cancer cells resistant to treatment, a process that is fundamentally evolutionary. To what extent, however, is the evolutionary perspective employed in research on therapeutic resistance and relapse? We analyzed 6,228 papers on therapeutic resistance and/or relapse in cancers and found that the use of evolution terms in abstracts has remained at about 1% since the 1980s. However, detailed coding of 22 recent papers revealed a higher proportion of papers using evolutionary methods or evolutionary theory, although this number is still less than 10%. Despite the fact that relapse and therapeutic resistance is essentially an evolutionary process, it appears that this framework has not permeated research. This represents an unrealized opportunity for advances in research on therapeutic resistance.

ContributorsAktipis, C. Athena (Author) / Kwan, Sau (Author) / Johnson, Kathryn (Author) / Neuberg, Steven (Author) / Maley, Carlo C. (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2011-11-17
129239-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

The U.S. scientific research community does not reflect America's diversity. Hispanics, African Americans, and Native Americans made up 31% of the general population in 2010, but they represented only 18 and 7% of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor's and doctoral degrees, respectively, and 6% of STEM faculty members

The U.S. scientific research community does not reflect America's diversity. Hispanics, African Americans, and Native Americans made up 31% of the general population in 2010, but they represented only 18 and 7% of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor's and doctoral degrees, respectively, and 6% of STEM faculty members (National Science Foundation [NSF], 2013). Equity in the scientific research community is important for a variety of reasons; a diverse community of researchers can minimize the negative influence of bias in scientific reasoning, because people from different backgrounds approach a problem from different perspectives and can raise awareness regarding biases (Intemann, 2009). Additionally, by failing to be attentive to equity, we may exclude some of the best and brightest scientific minds and limit the pool of possible scientists (Intemann, 2009). Given this need for equity, how can our scientific research community become more inclusive?

ContributorsBangera, Gita (Author) / Brownell, Sara (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2014-12-01
128963-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Background: Medical and public health scientists are using evolution to devise new strategies to solve major health problems. But based on a 2003 survey, medical curricula may not adequately prepare physicians to evaluate and extend these advances. This study assessed the change in coverage of evolution in North American medical schools

Background: Medical and public health scientists are using evolution to devise new strategies to solve major health problems. But based on a 2003 survey, medical curricula may not adequately prepare physicians to evaluate and extend these advances. This study assessed the change in coverage of evolution in North American medical schools since 2003 and identified opportunities for enriching medical education.

Methods: In 2013, curriculum deans for all North American medical schools were invited to rate curricular coverage and perceived importance of 12 core principles, the extent of anticipated controversy from adding evolution, and the usefulness of 13 teaching resources. Differences between schools were assessed by Pearson’s chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and Spearman’s correlation. Open-ended questions sought insight into perceived barriers and benefits.

Results: Despite repeated follow-up, 60 schools (39%) responded to the survey. There was no evidence of sample bias. The three evolutionary principles rated most important were antibiotic resistance, environmental mismatch, and somatic selection in cancer. While importance and coverage of principles were correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.01), coverage (at least moderate) lagged behind importance (at least moderate) by an average of 21% (SD = 6%). Compared to 2003, a range of evolutionary principles were covered by 4 to 74% more schools. Nearly half (48%) of responders anticipated igniting controversy at their medical school if they added evolution to their curriculum. The teaching resources ranked most useful were model test questions and answers, case studies, and model curricula for existing courses/rotations. Limited resources (faculty expertise) were cited as the major barrier to adding more evolution, but benefits included a deeper understanding and improved patient care.

Conclusion: North American medical schools have increased the evolution content in their curricula over the past decade. However, coverage is not commensurate with importance. At a few medical schools, anticipated controversy impedes teaching more evolution. Efforts to improve evolution education in medical schools should be directed toward boosting faculty expertise and crafting resources that can be easily integrated into existing curricula.

ContributorsHidaka, Brandon H. (Author) / Asghar, Anila (Author) / Aktipis, C. Athena (Author) / Nesse, Randolph (Author) / Wolpaw, Terry M. (Author) / Skursky, Nicole K. (Author) / Bennett, Katelyn J. (Author) / Beyrouty, Matthew W. (Author) / Schwartz, Mark D. (Author) / Department of Psychology (Contributor)
Created2015-03-08
128472-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

A central goal of biology is to uncover the genetic basis for the origin of new phenotypes. A particularly effective approach is to examine the genomic architecture of species that have secondarily lost a phenotype with respect to their close relatives. In the eusocial Hymenoptera, queens and workers have divergent

A central goal of biology is to uncover the genetic basis for the origin of new phenotypes. A particularly effective approach is to examine the genomic architecture of species that have secondarily lost a phenotype with respect to their close relatives. In the eusocial Hymenoptera, queens and workers have divergent phenotypes that may be produced via either expression of alternative sets of caste-specific genes and pathways or differences in expression patterns of a shared set of multifunctional genes. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we investigated how secondary loss of the worker phenotype in workerless ant social parasites impacted genome evolution across two independent origins of social parasitism in the ant genera Pogonomyrmex and Vollenhovia. We sequenced the genomes of three social parasites and their most-closely related eusocial host species and compared gene losses in social parasites with gene expression differences between host queens and workers. Virtually all annotated genes were expressed to some degree in both castes of the host, with most shifting in queen-worker bias across developmental stages. As a result, despite >1 My of divergence from the last common ancestor that had workers, the social parasites showed strikingly little evidence of gene loss, damaging mutations, or shifts in selection regime resulting from loss of the worker caste. This suggests that regulatory changes within a multifunctional genome, rather than sequence differences, have played a predominant role in the evolution of social parasitism, and perhaps also in the many gains and losses of phenotypes in the social insects.

ContributorsSmith, Chris R. (Author) / Helms Cahan, Sara (Author) / Kemena, Carsten (Author) / Brady, Sean G. (Author) / Yang, Wei (Author) / Bornberg-Bauer, Erich (Author) / Eriksson, Ti (Author) / Gadau, Juergen (Author) / Helmkampf, Martin (Author) / Gotzek, Dietrich (Author) / Okamoto Miyakawa, Misato (Author) / Suarez, Andrew V. (Author) / Mikheyev, Alexander (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2015-07-29
129061-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Introduction: Abundance of immune cells has been shown to have prognostic and predictive significance in many tumor types. Beyond abundance, the spatial organization of immune cells in relation to cancer cells may also have significant functional and clinical implications. However there is a lack of systematic methods to quantify spatial associations

Introduction: Abundance of immune cells has been shown to have prognostic and predictive significance in many tumor types. Beyond abundance, the spatial organization of immune cells in relation to cancer cells may also have significant functional and clinical implications. However there is a lack of systematic methods to quantify spatial associations between immune and cancer cells.

Methods: We applied ecological measures of species interactions to digital pathology images for investigating the spatial associations of immune and cancer cells in breast cancer. We used the Morisita-Horn similarity index, an ecological measure of community structure and predator–prey interactions, to quantify the extent to which cancer cells and immune cells colocalize in whole-tumor histology sections. We related this index to disease-specific survival of 486 women with breast cancer and validated our findings in a set of 516 patients from different hospitals.

Results: Colocalization of immune cells with cancer cells was significantly associated with a disease-specific survival benefit for all breast cancers combined. In HER2-positive subtypes, the prognostic value of immune-cancer cell colocalization was highly significant and exceeded those of known clinical variables. Furthermore, colocalization was a significant predictive factor for long-term outcome following chemotherapy and radiotherapy in HER2 and Luminal A subtypes, independent of and stronger than all known clinical variables.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates how ecological methods applied to the tumor microenvironment using routine histology can provide reproducible, quantitative biomarkers for identifying high-risk breast cancer patients. We found that the clinical value of immune-cancer interaction patterns is highly subtype-specific but substantial and independent to known clinicopathologic variables that mostly focused on cancer itself. Our approach can be developed into computer-assisted prediction based on histology samples that are already routinely collected.

ContributorsMaley, Carlo (Author) / Koelble, Konrad (Author) / Natrajan, Rachael (Author) / Aktipis, C. Athena (Author) / Yuan, Yinyin (Author) / Biodesign Institute (Contributor)
Created2015-09-22
128468-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

In a meta-analysis published by myself and co-authors, we report differences in the life history risk factors for estrogen receptor negative (ER−) and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers. Our meta-analysis did not find the association of ER− breast cancer risk with fast life history characteristics that Hidaka and Boddy

In a meta-analysis published by myself and co-authors, we report differences in the life history risk factors for estrogen receptor negative (ER−) and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers. Our meta-analysis did not find the association of ER− breast cancer risk with fast life history characteristics that Hidaka and Boddy suggest in their response to our article. There are a number of possible explanations for the differences between their conclusions and the conclusions we drew from our meta-analysis, including limitations of our meta-analysis and methodological challenges in measuring and categorizing estrogen receptor status. These challenges, along with the association of ER+ breast cancer with slow life history characteristics, may make it challenging to find a clear signal of ER− breast cancer with fast life history characteristics, even if that relationship does exist. The contradictory results regarding breast cancer risk and life history characteristics illustrate a more general challenge in evolutionary medicine: often different sub-theories in evolutionary biology make contradictory predictions about disease risk. In this case, life history models predict that breast cancer risk should increase with faster life history characteristics, while the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis predicts that breast cancer risk should increase with delayed reproduction. Whether life history tradeoffs contribute to ER− breast cancer is still an open question, but current models and several lines of evidence suggest that it is a possibility.

ContributorsAktipis, C. Athena (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2016-05-21