ASU Scholarship Showcase
This growing collection consists of scholarly works authored by ASU-affiliated faculty, staff, and community members, and it contains many open access articles. ASU-affiliated authors are encouraged to Share Your Work in KEEP.
Filtering by
- All Subjects: School budgets
- All Subjects: Conceptual art
- All Subjects: Education -- Political aspects
- All Subjects: Friendship
- All Subjects: Sewage
- Status: Published
![Does School Participatory Budgeting Increase Students’ Political Efficacy? Bandura’s “Sources,” Civic Pedagogy, and Education for Democracy](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-07/screen-shot-2021-07-20-at-6.10.57-pm.png?versionId=01Z5qqwcTKc.eJFlSZubPdwl2jx84EzA&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240511/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240511T175006Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=50f403703bae26ced734988020171399808d45a353142b3494434eaf0821e4d5&itok=Q5ViBtvN)
Does school participatory budgeting (SPB) increase students’ political efficacy? SPB, which is implemented in thousands of schools around the world, is a democratic process of deliberation and decision-making in which students determine how to spend a portion of the school’s budget. We examined the impact of SPB on political efficacy in one middle school in Arizona. Our participants’ (n = 28) responses on survey items designed to measure self-perceived growth in political efficacy indicated a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.46), suggesting that SPB is an effective approach to civic pedagogy, with promising prospects for developing students’ political efficacy.
![Rethinking Conceptual Art](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-03/caa.png?versionId=X.JGFqclVXFmZANwC2zmifduR4B9hWQ9&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240511/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240511T175014Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=8df36eaa54072e0cd5c71d5ecd927c4eacea1684a9279ffa7f37ae6334250c57&itok=dt-wWZYn)
This book review considers three books on Conceptual Art that appeared in this year, by Anne Rorimer, Michael Newman and Jon Bird, and Rosalind Krauss. In 2011 this review was distinguished as one of the most consulted in the history of caa.reviews; see Patricia Kelly, “2002,” at: http://www.caareviews.org/centennial/2002
![127819-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-04/127819-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=BeNPZHLjD3LJexYION.jzga3EbG5Vhli&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240511/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240511T175018Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=f930836be322843d4fe82ed9b8b00401d457f5dd1810501896b6f33b86b3f90a&itok=p4-00PeJ)
The Future of Wastewater Sensing workshop is part of a collaboration between Arizona State University Center for Nanotechnology in Society in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society, the Biodesign Institute’s Center for Environmental Security, LC Nano, and the Nano-enabled Water Treatment (NEWT) Systems NSF Engineering Research Center. The Future of Wastewater Sensing workshop explores how technologies for studying, monitoring, and mining wastewater and sewage sludge might develop in the future, and what consequences may ensue for public health, law enforcement, private industry, regulations and society at large. The workshop pays particular attention to how wastewater sensing (and accompanying research, technologies, and applications) can be innovated, regulated, and used to maximize societal benefit and minimize the risk of adverse outcomes, when addressing critical social and environmental challenges.
![128158-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-04/128158-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=9thCmHsKqy3AgHD99BaniVTdWQOed4ai&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240511/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240511T175029Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=9085d55e5fc21e891a0e3aab63781b8009b0acf34055f414dd43f27f3a2e0f01&itok=tL-mCwT4)
Jane Austen’s beloved naval brother, Charles Austen (1779–1852), had a significant impact on her literary career.We find probable traces of him in the male characters appearing in Mansfield Park (1814) and Persuasion (1818), and he is said to have offered naval vocabulary to help his sister revise the second edition of Mansfield Park (1816). In addition to his impact during Jane’s lifetime (1775–1817), Charles played a role in sustaining her posthumous celebrity, modest as it was at first. Two previously unpublished brief letters by him—and references to him in other correspondence—offer an opportunity to speculate about his role in supporting his late sister’s literary reputation.
![191905-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2024-03/191905-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=25Rhigdd1cq8JiRaGnO0x.GrCSv0Op6X&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240511/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240511T175008Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=cd481ae058fa10153b507a26a6460ef90ce506d5549199109fda4e9718d84da0&itok=Ywnwe6dA)