Matching Items (3)
Description
The ideas of measurement and measurement comparisons (e.g., fractions, ratios, quotients) are introduced to students in elementary school. However, studies report that students of all ages have difficulty comparing two quantities in terms of their relative size. Students often understand fractions such as 3/7 as part-whole relationships or “three out of seven.” These limited conceptions have been documented to have implications for understanding the quotient as a measure of relative size and when learning other foundational ideas in mathematics (e.g., rate of change). Many scholars have identified students’ ability to conceptualize the relative size of two quantities values as important for learning specific ideas such as constant rate of change, exponential growth, and derivative. However, few researchers have focused on students’ ways of thinking about multiplicatively comparing two quantities’ values as they vary together across select topics in precalculus. Relative size reasoning is a way of thinking one has developed when conceptualizing the comparison of two quantities’ values multiplicatively, as their values vary in tandem. This document reviews literature related to relative size reasoning and presents a conceptual analysis that leverages this research in describing what I mean by a relative size comparison and what it means to engage in relative size reasoning. I further illustrate the role of relative size reasoning in understanding rate of change, multiplicative growth, rational functions, and what a graph’s concavity conveys about how two quantities’ values vary together.
This study reports on three beginning calculus students’ ways of thinking as they completed tasks designed to elicit students’ relative size reasoning. The data revealed 4 ways of conceptualizing the idea of quotient and highlights the affordances of conceptualizing a quotient as a measure of the relative size of two quantities’ values. The study also reports data from investigating the validity of a collection of multiple-choice items designed to assess students’ relative size reasoning (RSR) abilities. Analysis of this data provided insights for refining the questions and answer choices for these assessment items.
ContributorsLock, Kayla Ashley (Author) / Carlson, Marilyn (Thesis advisor) / Apkarian, Naneh (Thesis advisor) / Strom, April (Committee member) / Byerley, Cameron (Committee member) / Roh, Kyeong-Hah (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Over the past thirty years, research on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) has developed and grown in popularity as an area of focus for improving mathematics teaching and students’ learning. Many scholars have investigated types of knowledge teachers use when teaching and the relationship between teacher knowledge and student performance. However, few researchers have studied the sources of teachers’ pedagogical decisions and actions and some studies have reported that advances in teachers’ mathematical meanings does not necessarily lead to a teacher conveying strong meanings to students. It has also been reported that a teacher’s ways of thinking about teaching an idea and actions to decenter can influence the teacher’s interactions with students.This document presents three papers detailing a multiple-case study that constitutes my dissertation. The first paper reviews the constructs researchers have used to investigate teachers’ knowledge base. This paper also provides a characterization of the first case’s mathematical meaning for teaching angle measure and the impact of her meaning on her interactions with students while teaching her angle measure lessons. The second paper examines another instructor’s meaning for an angle and its measure and illustrates the symbiotic relationship between the teacher’s mathematical meanings for teaching and decentering actions. This paper also characterizes how an instructor’s commitment to quantitative reasoning influences the teacher’s instructional orientation and instructional actions. Finally, the third paper includes a cross-case analysis of the two instructors’ mathematical meanings for teaching sine function and their enacted teaching practices, including their choice of tasks, interactions with students, and explanations while teaching their sine function lessons.
ContributorsRocha, Abby (Author) / Carlson, Marilyn P (Thesis advisor) / Thompson, Patrick (Committee member) / Tallman, Michael (Committee member) / O'Bryan, Alan (Committee member) / Strom, April (Committee member) / Apkarian, Naneh (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
The advancement of technology has substantively changed the practices of numerous professions, including teaching. When an instructor first adopts a new technology, established classroom practices are perturbed. These perturbations can have positive and negative, large or small, and long- or short-term effects on instructors’ abilities to teach mathematical concepts with the new technology. Therefore, in order to better understand teaching with technology, we need to take a closer look at the adoption of new technology in a mathematics classroom. Using interviews and classroom observations, I explored perturbations in mathematical classroom practices as an instructor implemented virtual manipulatives as novel didactic objects in rational function instruction. In particular, the instructor used didactic objects that were designed to lay the foundation for developing a conceptual understanding of rational functions through the coordination of relative size of the value of the numerator in terms of the value of the denominator. The results are organized according to a taxonomy that captures leader actions, communication, expectations of technology, roles, timing, student engagement, and mathematical conceptions.
ContributorsPampel, Krysten (Author) / Currin van de Sande, Carla (Thesis advisor) / Thompson, Patrick W (Committee member) / Carlson, Marilyn (Committee member) / Milner, Fabio (Committee member) / Strom, April (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017