Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

148134-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

In the United States, clinical testing is monitored by the federal and state governments, held to standards to ensure the safety and efficacy of these tests, as well as maintaining privacy for patients receiving a test. In order for the ABCTL to lawfully operate in the state of Arizona, it

In the United States, clinical testing is monitored by the federal and state governments, held to standards to ensure the safety and efficacy of these tests, as well as maintaining privacy for patients receiving a test. In order for the ABCTL to lawfully operate in the state of Arizona, it had to meet various legal criteria. These major legal considerations, in no particular order, are: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments compliance; FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance; state licensure; patient, state, and federal result reporting; and liability. <br/>In this paper, the EUA pathway will be examined and contextualized in relation to the ABCTL. This will include an examination of the FDA regulations and policies that affect the laboratory during its operations, as well as a look at the different authorization pathways for diagnostic tests present during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ContributorsJenkins, Landon James (Co-author) / Espinoza, Hale Anna (Co-author) / Filipek, Marina (Co-author) / Ross, Nathaniel (Co-author) / Salvatierra, Madeline (Co-author) / Compton, Carolyn (Thesis director) / Rigoni, Adam (Committee member) / Stanford, Michael (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2021-05
187434-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Disabled people have historically lacked legal protection and often faced discrimination in healthcare, reproductive rights, education, and more despite being the largest minority group in the United States. One of the most common ways that American disability activists have advocated for their rights is by challenging discriminatory behavior or regulations

Disabled people have historically lacked legal protection and often faced discrimination in healthcare, reproductive rights, education, and more despite being the largest minority group in the United States. One of the most common ways that American disability activists have advocated for their rights is by challenging discriminatory behavior or regulations in court and advocating for policy change in local, state, and federal governments. As a result, understanding the relationships between legislation and the judicial processes by which American judges approach disability discrimination is crucial to protecting and expanding the rights of disabled Americans. This study analyzes five American disability rights cases from the last fifty years as well as two foundational pieces of federal legislation, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). I conducted this research as a member of the Embryo Project, where I wrote and peer-reviewed articles for the Embryo Project Encyclopedia, which is an online open-access resource for topics relating to reproduction, embryology, and development. In my articles, I summarize the litigation and holdings of each case with additional contextualization in science and society. The passage of the ADA represents a watershed moment after which the American judiciary observed the rights of the disabled as legislatively codified rather than only subject to interpretations of the Constitution. Since laws can be repealed far more easily than constitutional amendments, precedent from legislative interpretation is only as secure as the law on which it is based. Lawmakers must understand the need to craft legislation with reduced textual ambiguity to prevent undermining the original intent of the law. With the recent overturning of long-standing precedent and the composition of the Supreme Court as of 2023, disability rights are on fragile footing. Judicial behavior in response to disability legislation has historically narrowed the protections offered by federal statute and failed to bolster disability rights by refusing to base decisions on Constitutional protections.
ContributorsRoss, Nathaniel (Author) / Maienschein, Jane (Thesis advisor) / Yudell, Michael (Committee member) / Compton, Carolyn (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
163900-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

This Project Report documents the accomplishments of an extraordinary group of students, faculty, and staff at the Arizona state University, who participated in a year-long, multidisciplinary, first-of-its-kind academic endeavor entitled “The Making of a COVID Lab.” The lab that is the focus of this project is the ASU Biodesign Clinical

This Project Report documents the accomplishments of an extraordinary group of students, faculty, and staff at the Arizona state University, who participated in a year-long, multidisciplinary, first-of-its-kind academic endeavor entitled “The Making of a COVID Lab.” The lab that is the focus of this project is the ASU Biodesign Clinical Testing Laboratory, known simply as the ABCTL.

ContributorsCompton, Carolyn C. (Project director) / Christianson, Serena L. (Project director) / Floyd, Christopher (Project director) / Schneller, Eugene S (Research team head) / Rigoni, Adam (Research team head) / Stanford, Michael (Research team head) / Cheong, Pauline (Research team head) / McCarville, Daniel R. (Research team head) / Dudley, Sean (Research team head) / Blum, Nita (Research team head) / Magee, Mitch (Research team head) / Agee, Claire (Research team member) / Cosgrove, Samuel (Research team member) / English, Corinne (Research team member) / Mattson, Kyle (Research team member) / Qian, Michael (Research team member) / Espinoza, Hale Anna (Research team member) / Filipek, Marina (Research team member) / Jenkins, Landon James (Research team member) / Ross, Nathaniel (Research team member) / Salvatierra, Madeline (Research team member) / Serrano, Osvin (Research team member) / Wakefield, Alex (Research team member) / Calo, Van Dexter (Research team member) / Nofi, Matthew (Research team member) / Raymond, Courtney (Research team member) / Barwey, Ishna (Research team member) / Bruner, Ashley (Research team member) / Hymer, William (Research team member) / Krell, Abby Elizabeth (Research team member) / Lewis, Gabriel (Research team member) / Myers, Jack (Research team member) / Ramesh, Frankincense (Research team member) / Reagan, Sage (Research team member) / Kandan, Mani (Research team member) / Knox, Garrett (Research team member) / Leung, Michael (Research team member) / Schmit, Jacob (Research team member) / Woo, Sabrina (Research team member) / Anderson, Laura (Research team member) / Breshears, Scott (Research team member) / Majhail, Kajol (Research team member) / Ruan, Ellen (Research team member) / Smetanick, Jennifer (Research team member) / Bardfeld, Sierra (Research team member) / Cura, Joriel (Research team member) / Dholaria, Nikhil (Research team member) / Foote, Hannah (Research team member) / Liu, Tara (Research team member) / Raymond, Julia (Research team member) / Varghese, Mahima (Research team member)
Created2021