Matching Items (2)
133855-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species is the most comprehensive and objective global approach to evaluate the conservation status of species by categorizing species based on relative extinction risk. For the Global Muranidae IUCN Red List assessment, all known, taxonomically valid species of Muraenidae

The International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species is the most comprehensive and objective global approach to evaluate the conservation status of species by categorizing species based on relative extinction risk. For the Global Muranidae IUCN Red List assessment, all known, taxonomically valid species of Muraenidae were assessed for their extinction risk using the IUCN Red List Global Categories and Criteria. Of all 208 Muraenidae species, it was concluded that 86% of species qualified for Least Concern, 13% of species are Data Deficient, and 1% of species qualified for a threatened category. Channomuraena bauchotae is listed as threatened under VU D2 and Gymnothorax parini qualified for VU B2ab(iii). This study will have brought the International Union for the Conservation of Nature one step closer to their goal of conducting Red List assessments of all the world's species(not including microorganisms). Future implications of this study may include future monitoring of key habitat areas and species or conducting further research to gain a more in depth understanding of the life history and threats to Muraenidae.
ContributorsLaurence, Paige Marie (Author) / Polidoro, Beth (Thesis director) / Ralph, Gina (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
128936-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Knowledge products comprise assessments of authoritative information supported by standards, governance, quality control, data, tools, and capacity building mechanisms. Considerable resources are dedicated to developing and maintaining knowledge products for biodiversity conservation, and they are widely used to inform policy and advise decision makers and practitioners. However, the financial cost

Knowledge products comprise assessments of authoritative information supported by standards, governance, quality control, data, tools, and capacity building mechanisms. Considerable resources are dedicated to developing and maintaining knowledge products for biodiversity conservation, and they are widely used to inform policy and advise decision makers and practitioners. However, the financial cost of delivering this information is largely undocumented. We evaluated the costs and funding sources for developing and maintaining four global biodiversity and conservation knowledge products: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems, Protected Planet, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. These are secondary data sets, built on primary data collected by extensive networks of expert contributors worldwide.

We estimate that US$160 million (range: US$116–204 million), plus 293 person-years of volunteer time (range: 278–308 person-years) valued at US$ 14 million (range US$12–16 million), were invested in these four knowledge products between 1979 and 2013. More than half of this financing was provided through philanthropy, and nearly three-quarters was spent on personnel costs. The estimated annual cost of maintaining data and platforms for three of these knowledge products (excluding the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems for which annual costs were not possible to estimate for 2013) is US$6.5 million in total (range: US$6.2–6.7 million). We estimated that an additional US$114 million will be needed to reach pre-defined baselines of data coverage for all the four knowledge products, and that once achieved, annual maintenance costs will be approximately US$12 million. These costs are much lower than those to maintain many other, similarly important, global knowledge products. Ensuring that biodiversity and conservation knowledge products are sufficiently up to date, comprehensive and accurate is fundamental to inform decision-making for biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Thus, the development and implementation of plans for sustainable long-term financing for them is critical.

ContributorsJuffe-Bignoli, Diego (Author) / Brooks, Thomas M. (Author) / Butchart, Stuart H. M. (Author) / Jenkins, Richard B. (Author) / Boe, Kaia (Author) / Hoffmann, Michael (Author) / Angulo, Ariadne (Author) / Bachman, Steve (Author) / Bohm, Monika (Author) / Brummitt, Neil (Author) / Carpenter, Kent E. (Author) / Comer, Pat J. (Author) / Cox, Neil (Author) / Cuttelod, Annabelle (Author) / Darwall, William R. T. (Author) / Di Marco, Moreno (Author) / Fishpool, Lincoln D. C. (Author) / Goettsch, Barbara (Author) / Heath, Melanie (Author) / Hilton-Taylor, Craig (Author) / Hutton, Jon (Author) / Johnson, Tim (Author) / Joolia, Ackbar (Author) / Keith, David A. (Author) / Langhammer, Penny (Author) / Luedtke, Jennifer (Author) / Lughadha, Elmear Nic (Author) / Lutz, Maiko (Author) / May, Ian (Author) / Miller, Rebecca M. (Author) / Oliveira-Miranda, Maria A. (Author) / Parr, Mike (Author) / Pollock, Caroline M. (Author) / Ralph, Gina (Author) / Rodriguez, Jon Paul (Author) / Rondinini, Carlo (Author) / Smart, Jane (Author) / Stuart, Simon (Author) / Symes, Andy (Author) / Tordoff, Andrew W. (Author) / Woodley, Stephen (Author) / Young, Bruce (Author) / Kingston, Naomi (Author) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2016-08-16