Matching Items (1,036)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

156186-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This thesis uses an aircraft aerodynamic model and propulsion data, which

represents a configuration similar to the Airbus A320, to perform trade studies to understand the weight and configuration effects of “out-of-trim” flight during takeoff, cruise, initial approach, and balked landing. It is found that flying an aircraft slightly above the

This thesis uses an aircraft aerodynamic model and propulsion data, which

represents a configuration similar to the Airbus A320, to perform trade studies to understand the weight and configuration effects of “out-of-trim” flight during takeoff, cruise, initial approach, and balked landing. It is found that flying an aircraft slightly above the angle of attack or pitch angle required for a trimmed, stabilized flight will cause the aircraft to lose speed rapidly. This effect is most noticeable for lighter aircraft and when one engine is rendered inoperative. In the event of an engine failure, if the pilot does not pitch the nose of the aircraft down quickly, speed losses are significant and potentially lead to stalling the aircraft. Even when the risk of stalling the aircraft is small, the implications on aircraft climb performance, obstacle clearance, and acceleration distances can still become problematic if the aircraft is not flown properly. When the aircraft is slightly above the trimmed angle of attack, the response is shown to closely follow the classical phugoid response where the aircraft will trade speed and altitude in an oscillatory manner. However, when the pitch angle is slightly above the trimmed condition, the aircraft does not show this phugoid pattern but instead just loses speed until it reaches a new stabilized trajectory, never having speed and altitude oscillate. In this event, the way a pilot should respond to both events is different and may cause confusion in the cockpit.
ContributorsDelisle, Mathew Robert (Author) / Takahashi, Timothy (Thesis advisor) / White, Daniel (Committee member) / Niemczyk, Mary (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
157125-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This study identifies the influence that leading-edge shape has on the aerodynamic characteristics of a wing using surface far-field and near-field analysis. It examines if a wake survey is the appropriate means for measuring profile drag and induced drag. The paper unveils the differences between sharp leading-edge and blunt leading-edge

This study identifies the influence that leading-edge shape has on the aerodynamic characteristics of a wing using surface far-field and near-field analysis. It examines if a wake survey is the appropriate means for measuring profile drag and induced drag. The paper unveils the differences between sharp leading-edge and blunt leading-edge wings with the tools of pressure loop, chordwise pressure distribution, span load plots and with wake integral computations. The analysis was performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), vortex lattice potential flow code (VORLAX), and a few wind-tunnels runs to acquire data for comparison. This study found that sharp leading-edge wings have less leading-edge suction and higher drag than blunt leading-edge wings.

The blunt leading-edge wings have less drag because the normal vector of the surface in the front section of the airfoil develops forces at opposed skin friction. The shape of the leading edge, in conjunction with the effect of viscosity, slightly alter the span load; both the magnitude of the lift and the transverse distribution. Another goal in this study is to verify the veracity of wake survey theory; the two different leading-edge shapes reveals the shortcoming of Mclean’s equation which is only applicable to blunt leading-edge wings.
ContributorsOu, Che Wei (Author) / Takahashi, Timothy (Thesis advisor) / Herrmann, Marcus (Committee member) / Huang, Huei-Ping (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
157140-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In previous work, the effects of power extraction for onboard electrical equipment and flight control systems were studied to determine which turbine shaft (i.e. high power shaft vs low power shaft) is best suited for power extraction. This thesis will look into an alternative option, a three-spool design with a

In previous work, the effects of power extraction for onboard electrical equipment and flight control systems were studied to determine which turbine shaft (i.e. high power shaft vs low power shaft) is best suited for power extraction. This thesis will look into an alternative option, a three-spool design with a high-pressure turbine, low-pressure turbine, and a turbine dedicated to driving the fan. One of the three-spool turbines is designed to be a vaneless counter-rotating turbine. The off-design performance of this new design will be compared to the traditional two-spool design to determine if the additional spool is a practical alternative to current designs for high shaft horsepower extraction requirements. Upon analysis, this thesis has shown that a three-spool engine with a vaneless counter-rotating stage has worse performance characteristics than traditional two-spool designs for UAV systems.
ContributorsBurgett, Luke Michael (Author) / Takahashi, Timothy (Thesis advisor) / Dahm, Werner (Committee member) / Trimble, Steve (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019