Matching Items (12)
Description
This study addresses the problem of low-income, first-generation college students who are academically successful, but choose to leave college before finishing due to financial constraints. This study investigates their lived experiences as well as the effects of a peer mentorship program where incoming, first-year, low-income, first-generation college students are paired with a trained peer mentor from a similar background. Together the pair jointly explore available financial resources and troubleshoot barriers to access. This study draws on four primary theories: Social Cognitive Theory, Intersectionality, Community Cultural Wealth, and Critical Pedagogy. This mixed methods action research study uses multiple types of data: individual interviews, focus group, photo elicitation, demographic questionnaires, and pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. Findings indicate increases in self-efficacy for and knowledge about accessing financial resources after participating in the program.
ContributorsBevins, Jennifer (Author) / Chen, Ying-Chih (Thesis advisor) / Carrillo, Juan (Committee member) / Morgan, Chad (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
This study examined perception of K12 schooling systems as experienced by a randomsample of adults in Phoenix, AZ. It explored whether the values purported as key factors
in the American K12 schooling system - as presented in academic literature - were compatible with the lives, interests and goals of ‘users’, student-participants. In addition, it offered opportunity for post-K12 student-participants to share their views on the purposes, goals, and outcomes they held to be important. The sample consisted of 139 post-K12 stu-
dents/individuals residing in Phoenix, AZ. Mean age of student-participants was 29. Results indicated a mismatch between purported K12 schooling goals and important outcomes embedded in the system and values held by the K12 student-participants. The participants in this research generally perceived K12 schooling as valuable, both to themselves and to society at large, but stressed that the deficiencies they perceived in the system were particular to delivery platforms as they relate to the learning styles of students and belonging. Future life skills and success - in and after K12 schooling - whether related to college or not were also of importance. Results revealed that the initial hypothesis of income, age, and ethnicity as
key factors in satisfaction with K12 schooling was not borne-out. Rather it revealed that a sense of belonging and the suitability of learning platforms to the individual learning styles of students were of greatest significance.
ContributorsParker-Anderies, Margaret (Author) / Janssen, Marco (Thesis advisor) / Garcia, David (Committee member) / Mishra, Punya (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
This three-paper dissertation explores the ways in which the skills, dispositions, tools, social norms, and ways of knowing associated with maker practices and design theory illuminate opportunities and challenges for changing education systems. Making and design are unique in that they provide alternative visions for the central aims of schooling as well as a novel set of approaches for the realization of such visions. This duality is explored at three organizational scales: student experience, educator practice, and school leadership. The findings of these investigations highlight major barriers to creating and sustaining innovative education systems while also suggesting ways that these barriers may be overcome. The first paper, which details a qualitative study of 27 young adult makers and their parents, suggests that even strong proponents of maker-based education are bound by the institutional logics of formal education and have a hard time imagining how making could be integrated into school. The second paper documents a design-based research study, in which 20 preservice teachers in an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education course show that their current training emphasizes the delivery standards-based content over the design of student-centered learning experiences. These studies prompted and shaped the development of a theoretically grounded, design-based conceptual model, detailed in the third paper, which aims to help multi-stakeholder design teams more rigorously imagine new futures for existing schools using generative, participatory prototyping activities.
ContributorsWeiner, Steven (Author) / Jordan, Shawn S (Thesis advisor) / Lande, Micah (Committee member) / Mishra, Punya (Committee member) / Wylie, Ruth (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Experiential learning has gained the attention of higher education institutions, specifically business schools, as a way to bring the business world into the classroom. It has become a fundamental methodology for designing business schools' curricula that promotes 21st-century skills like problem-solving, creativity, and teamwork. This study evaluates an experiential learning-based undergraduate business program and its signature entrepreneurship course. The goal is to understand how the entrepreneurship course and its experiential learning component, design sprint, influence first-year students' entrepreneurial mindset, creative self-efficacy and teamwork self-efficacy. Additionally, this study aims to understand the perceptions of first-year undergraduate students of their experiential activities and how they make sense of these experiences.
This action research study draws from theories of learning and psychology, such as Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) by Kolb (1984, 2015); mindset theory by Dweck et al. (1995) and Dweck (2006); self-efficacy by Bandura (1977, 1997); and figured worlds by Holland et al. (1998). These theories support the research questions by emphasizing the collaborative nature of learning, how beliefs about learning, intelligence, and capabilities influence an individual's behavior, and how the environment shapes an individual's interpretation of the world.
This mixed-methods action research study combines quantitative data in the form of a pre and post-intervention survey. The qualitative data was gathered from interviews that focused on understanding the experiences of participating students and their perceptions of their learning after the intervention workshop. Additionally, qualitative data included a feedback survey after the workshop to learn students' perceptions of the intervention activities.
The results of this study suggest that experiential learning activities support students' growth of their creative skills and help them view entrepreneurship from a user-centered perspective. Additionally, results suggested that short-term experiential projects tend to inhibit students from growing in their teamwork skills as they focus all their attention to their project. Lastly, results suggest experiential learning programs can become a space for collaboration, skill development, and motivated students. However, it can also lead to students feeling frustrated and alienated due to the professional codes permeating experiential settings. The study concludes with several implications for practitioners.
ContributorsFrias Vargas, Alfonsina (Author) / Carrillo, Juan (Thesis advisor) / Henriksen, Danah (Thesis advisor) / Mishra, Punya (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
All high school students deserve access to experiences that will help shape their perspectives of post-secondary options. They also deserve adequate preparation for said experiences. Minimal consideration is given to how to prepare low-income Latinx high school students for success in internships. Thus, this mixed-methods action research study utilized a Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) framework to investigate a semester-long internship preparation course. It explored how students recognize and develop navigational capital from the Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) framework as well as Career Decision Self-Efficacy (CDSE) while preparing for a subsequent internship. Data analysis and its triangulation were derived from participants’ interviews and a focus group, as well as surveys from the treatment group and control group. Results suggest that the intervention was successful in preparing participants for an internship and increasing their CDSE, but results were inconclusive on whether navigational capital was affected.
ContributorsMason, Nicole (Author) / Chen, Ying-Chih (Thesis advisor) / Ross, Lydia (Committee member) / Carrillo, Juan (Committee member) / Martinez, Robert (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Individuals of Latinx origin are the largest minority group in the United States, and the fastest growing enrollment demographic in institutions of higher education. Yet, the achievement and opportunity gap that is demonstrated by Latinx students compared to their White counterparts continues to widen. Latinx individuals often experience cultural barriers in postsecondary education, especially in the academic advisor relationship. This study aims to help academic advisor leaders learn the Latinx undergraduate student experience in an effort to improve cultural competence in working with this population, and grow their leadership practices to help their direct reports working with Latinx students. The data for this research were collected via an action research study using observations, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews as data collection methods. The findings indicate that learning through testimonios and personal narratives grows awareness and appreciation for Latinx individuals, but also strengthens workplace relationships. This correlates with improved leadership practices and cultivating an environment of inclusivity. The study’s participants experienced the emotional impact of engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion work and vocalized a strong desire to continue learning about work in this space. The findings indicate the need for additional professional development in learning about the Latinx student experience, and additional resources dedicated to engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion work in the university.
ContributorsFreitchen, Esperanza (Author) / Markos, Amy (Thesis advisor) / Carrillo, Juan (Committee member) / Rowland, Terri (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
This action research study explores the impact of Street Law's deliberation lessons on the self-efficacy of students participating in the We the People: the Citizen and the Constitution program (WTP). This study takes place at an Arizona high school and is grounded in cooperative learning theory, constructivist theory and self-efficacy theory. A sequential Quantitative → Qualitative MMAR study was used to have qualitative findings complement the quantitative analysis by offering a deeper understanding of the indicated changes in self-efficacy. Pre- and post-surveys served as the quantitative data while focus group interviews, student work samples, and open response questions provided qualitative data. The WTP students participated in four deliberation lessons designed by Street Law. These lessons were implemented to assess whether they could enhance students' confidence and skills in engaging in deliberative processes and civil discourse. The results of the study indicate a significant increase in students' confidence in deliberation and civil discourse following the implementation of the deliberation lessons (p=0.0326). This finding suggests that incorporating structured deliberation activities can effectively enhance students' self-efficacy in engaging in meaningful discussions and participating in civil discourse. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on civic education and civic skills by demonstrating the effectiveness of using deliberation lessons to increase students’ confidence in deliberation and civil discourse. The findings of this study underscore the value of providing students with opportunities to learn, practice, and develop the civic skills necessary to engage in American democracy as informed and participatory citizens.
ContributorsRund, Alison (Author) / Carrillo, Juan (Thesis advisor) / McArthur Harris, Lauren (Committee member) / Owen, Diana (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024
Description
Each year, the existing cohort of elementary teachers at The American School participate in a professional development program. This program includes both academic and social adaptation resources and support for teachers within the school community. Previous to this research study, the program mostly included training on academic programs, assessment strategies that align with the policies and resources for teachers to explore to support their curriculum. Most teachers requested training on the standards and assessment practices as the school made strategic shifts toward new pedagogical practices. Glaringly absent from this training was any support with the cultural transition for teachers, most of whom have not worked within a Mexican school setting with a largely Mexican family demographic. This action research study draws from theories of decolonization, postcolonialism, culturally relevant pedagogy, cultural mindset and critical whiteness studies. This case study took place during the second semester of the 2022-2023 school year at The American School, in Torreón, Mexico. Four international elementary teachers were randomly selected to participate in the study and agreed to engage in all elements of the data collection over the course of two months. Data collection included teacher classroom observations, multiple collective biography sessions, a focus group and individual interviews. The results from this study demonstrated that a colonial mindset heavily influenced teachers' decisions and beliefs about their work, sense of power within the classroom and how they interact with their students. Additionally, the research suggests that there was a dominant teacher-centered approach to pedagogical practices, and this reinforced traditional and Eurocentric values. Finally, an analysis of teacher emotions suggested elements of both white fragility and white fatigue centered around conversations of race, culture and oppression. The conclusion of this study includes a discussion of recommendations for future training, with the hopes of the patterns demonstrated in the cases studied.
ContributorsLear, Leann (Author) / Carrillo, Juan (Thesis advisor) / Kasun, Sue (Committee member) / Nielsen, Ann (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024
Description
A reform movement in the United States has focused on STEM education and 21st century soft skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity. This spotlight on STEM instruction provided an opportunity to explore how K-14 STEM teacher participants perceived a Design Thinking Instructional Problems (DTIP) approach to developing instructional lessons. The study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design with a survey instrument and a multiple case study focused on K-14 in-service STEM teachers. Data were collected from teacher participants during two five-week summer Research Experience for Teachers (RET) programs as part of two separate National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Engineering Research Centers (ERC) located at a large southwestern university in the United States (n=16). The study was conducted over three phases. During Phase I and II, teacher participants experienced a Design Thinking Overview workshop and weekly DTIP professional development sessions to facilitate the development of an RET instructional lesson. Pre- and post-program DTIP surveys and background interviews were conducted with all teacher participants (n=16). From this original group, teacher participants were selected as cases. Implementation observations and post-implementation interviews were conducted with these case-teachers (n=10). The study included frequency analysis and descriptive statistics of survey data. Qualitative data were analyzed using direct interpretation, thematic analysis, and open coding with the constant comparative method. A variety of arrays, summaries, and matrices were used to visualize patterns across and within individual case-teacher results. All 16 teacher participants viewed themselves as designers solving complex instructional problems. All 16 teacher participants found the DTIP professional development sessions to have somewhat to very much provided additional value during their RET summer programs. Six of the 10 case-teachers perceived the DTIP model graphic as mostly to completely corresponding to the way in which they developed their RET instructional lesson. Lastly, eight of the 10 case-teachers chose to embed a Design Thinking student learning strategy into the RET instructional lesson they developed.
ContributorsElwood, Kristin (Author) / Savenye, Wilhelmina (Thesis advisor) / Jordan, Michelle E (Committee member) / Henriksen, Danah (Committee member) / Mishra, Punya (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Preservice teachers are faced with many challenges as they enter their first year of teaching. This is particularly true when dealing with future-ready skills, such as technology integration in K-12 classrooms, an area where many higher education or teaching faculty may not feel comfortable or fluent enough to support preservice teachers or to model in their own instruction.
This action research study aimed to understand how faculty develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in ways that will help them to enhance their instruction and model technology integration for preservice teachers. An online community was created that allowed teacher educators to interact synchronously or asynchronously to collaborate, learn, and practice new technological skills. This community served as a place for teacher educators to play with new technology and to share their ideas and practices with their peers—ideally to begin the process of developing the knowledge and fluency with technology that would allow them to better support teacher education students.
Both qualitative and quantitative data were used to explore faculty’s development of TPACK. A pre-survey, retrospective pre-survey, and post-survey were administered and analyzed. Also, interviews of participants and observations of the online community were used to collect qualitative data.
The results of the study showed an increase in participants’ confidence for selecting technologies to enhance their instruction after they participated in the online community. Also, the participants felt more confident using strategies that combine content, technologies, and teaching approaches in their classrooms or other learning environments.
In Chapter 5, a discussion of the findings was presented, in which several main implications are shared for researchers who might be engaged in similar work. Also, the lessons learned from this action research are explained, as well as the limitations experienced in this study.
This action research study aimed to understand how faculty develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in ways that will help them to enhance their instruction and model technology integration for preservice teachers. An online community was created that allowed teacher educators to interact synchronously or asynchronously to collaborate, learn, and practice new technological skills. This community served as a place for teacher educators to play with new technology and to share their ideas and practices with their peers—ideally to begin the process of developing the knowledge and fluency with technology that would allow them to better support teacher education students.
Both qualitative and quantitative data were used to explore faculty’s development of TPACK. A pre-survey, retrospective pre-survey, and post-survey were administered and analyzed. Also, interviews of participants and observations of the online community were used to collect qualitative data.
The results of the study showed an increase in participants’ confidence for selecting technologies to enhance their instruction after they participated in the online community. Also, the participants felt more confident using strategies that combine content, technologies, and teaching approaches in their classrooms or other learning environments.
In Chapter 5, a discussion of the findings was presented, in which several main implications are shared for researchers who might be engaged in similar work. Also, the lessons learned from this action research are explained, as well as the limitations experienced in this study.
ContributorsScott, Lynda (Author) / Henriksen, Danah (Thesis advisor) / Mishra, Punya (Committee member) / Wolf, Leigh (Committee member) / Leahy, Sean (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019