Matching Items (2)
Description
This dissertation examines microevolutionary changes in the Eastern Adriatic and hinterland during Roman imperialism, evaluating changing patterns of variation among indigenous groups with varying histories of acceptance or defiance to Roman rule. Despite the prevalence of Roman influence, trade, and the accommodating nature of Roman political authority administered through existing local leaders, Eastern Adriatic and hinterland peoples underwent significant cultural transformations. Unlike the Roman-allied Liburnians, Romanization was not a voluntary and amicable process for the resisting Delmatae, Histri, Japodes, and Pannonians. The violent experiences of locals during the late Republican Period and early Roman Empire, including death, enslavement, conscription, and displacement, contrast with the eventual integration of the region by the end of the Roman Empire, when their descendants were Roman citizens. These complex histories make it challenging to understand local identities and the impact of Romanization. Biological distance analyses of dental morphology from Liburnian, Delmatae, Japodes, and Pannonian samples representing 313 individuals dating to the Iron Age (c. 700- 400 BCE), and Roman Period (Roman Republic c. 200- 0 BCE; Roman Empire c. 1- 500 CE), were contextualized with archaeological data and classical research. Results indicated no significant differences within Eastern Adriatic and hinterland populations across the time periods. However, interpretations of the results for Roman Period Liburnians, descendants of Roman allies, suggest differentiation from contemporaneous Italic Romans. Conversely, the descendants of resisting populations were not statistically different from Roman Empire Italics, potentially influenced by their ancestors’ experiences of war affecting subsequent admixture, community formation, and adherence to prevailing norms.
Roman laws that managed access to advantageous status identities through marriage and citizenship may also explain the findings that all surveyed local populations demonstrate continuity between ancestors and descendants. The dynamic of being identified as Roman, and yet descending from the people who fought against Rome, is further discussed as a form of biological imperialism, consequentially shaping indigenous ancestral ties within a pan-regional Roman citizenry. While Roman multiculturalism is often considered exemplary of Antique Period diversity, Roman values prioritized diversity when it was advantageous and used pluralism to encourage cultural assimilation and define outsiders.
ContributorsLoewen, Tisa Nicolette (Author) / Stojanowski, Christopher (Thesis advisor) / Buikstra, Jane (Committee member) / Novak, Mario (Committee member) / Knudson, Kelly (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024
Description
War exacts a great social cost, not only upon its direct participants, but also upon the lives of the friends, family, and community of those who experience it. This cost is particularly evident in the increased frequencies of aggressive behaviors, including homicide, assault, and domestic violence, enacted by Western military veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Similarly, among contemporary non-Westernized peoples, a cross-cultural conducted by Ember and Ember (1994) found a relationship between war and various forms of intragroup violence, including domestic violence, assaults, homicides, and violent sports. It is unknown, however, if this positive association between warfare and intragroup violence extends longitudinally for prehistoric populations uninfluenced by modern states.
To test Ember and Ember’s (1994) results in an archaeological culture, this study examines whether or not an association between war and intragroup violence was present during the Mississippian Period (ca. AD 1000-1450) of the Central Illinois Valley (CIV). The Mississippian Period of the CIV represents an ideal context for examining war and violence questions, as considerable evidence of war and violence has been amassed from archaeological and bioarchaeological analyses. High rates of skeletal trauma, fortification construction, and the placement of habitations sites in defendable areas indicate war was of particular concern during this period. Yet, little is known regarding the diachronic and synchronic variation in violence in this region.
In this research, skeletal remains representing 776 individuals from five CIV sites (Dickson Mounds, Larson, Berry, Crable, and Emmons) were analyzed for violence-related skeletal trauma, biodistance, and mortuary data. From the aggregation of these data, two models of intergroup violence and two models of intragroup violence were explored. The intergroup models examined were: 1) warfare victims from the local community and 2) warfare captives. The intragroup models assessed include: 1) domestic violence and 2) male-male fights. Results support the hypothesis that as intergroup violence increased during the Mississippian Period in the CIV, intragroup violence increased concomitantly. While warfare and intragroup violence occurred in low frequencies early in the Mississippian Period, after AD 1200, both intragroup and intergroup violence were likely endemic.
To test Ember and Ember’s (1994) results in an archaeological culture, this study examines whether or not an association between war and intragroup violence was present during the Mississippian Period (ca. AD 1000-1450) of the Central Illinois Valley (CIV). The Mississippian Period of the CIV represents an ideal context for examining war and violence questions, as considerable evidence of war and violence has been amassed from archaeological and bioarchaeological analyses. High rates of skeletal trauma, fortification construction, and the placement of habitations sites in defendable areas indicate war was of particular concern during this period. Yet, little is known regarding the diachronic and synchronic variation in violence in this region.
In this research, skeletal remains representing 776 individuals from five CIV sites (Dickson Mounds, Larson, Berry, Crable, and Emmons) were analyzed for violence-related skeletal trauma, biodistance, and mortuary data. From the aggregation of these data, two models of intergroup violence and two models of intragroup violence were explored. The intergroup models examined were: 1) warfare victims from the local community and 2) warfare captives. The intragroup models assessed include: 1) domestic violence and 2) male-male fights. Results support the hypothesis that as intergroup violence increased during the Mississippian Period in the CIV, intragroup violence increased concomitantly. While warfare and intragroup violence occurred in low frequencies early in the Mississippian Period, after AD 1200, both intragroup and intergroup violence were likely endemic.
ContributorsHatch, Mallorie Ann, 1983- (Author) / Buikstra, Jane (Thesis advisor) / Spielmann, Katherine (Committee member) / Carr, Christopher (Committee member) / Milner, George (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015