Matching Items (2)
Filtering by
- Genre: Masters Thesis
Description
Porbeagles (Lamna nasus) are a highly commercially important shark species that is threatened with extinction due to overfishing. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) displacement loop (D-loop) sequence data from 18 Northwest (NW) Atlantic and 30 Southwest (SW) Pacific porbeagles reveal that these regional populations have been genetically separated between 1.39 and 1.25 million years ago (MYA), a time frame which correlates with the end of the earth’s last cooling period. There is far greater genetic differentiation (FST = 0.835) between the NW and SW populations than among sharks within each population supporting a very high level of divergence. A lack of gene flow probably stemming from their limited distribution to cold water temperatures (-1oC to 15oC) has led to their genetic divergence. The NW Atlantic population exhibited fewer haplotypes than the SW Pacific population (2 vs 4). The mean nucleotide diversity value of the NW Atlantic population was also 50% lower (0.00143 vs. 0.00228). Male and female NW Atlantic individuals reflected virtually identical mean population diversity values (0.00393 vs 0.00399); however, females were prevalent near shorelines while the males were more often found in open waters. Of the three age groups within the NW Atlantic population, the immature individuals exhibited the greatest mean nucleotide diversity (0.00452), followed by the sub-adult group (0.00293) and the mature group (0.00288), suggesting that dispersion starts earlier in their life cycle and reduces as they get older. The porbeagle population biology, as revealed by D-loop sequence information, may have significant implications for the conservation efforts of this species. As differences in age-based and sex-based dispersion exist, it is important to understand the relative contributions of gene flow by adults of both sexes in order to implement more effective conservation strategies.
ContributorsHickey, Kaitlyn (Author) / Kanthaswamy, Sreetharan (Thesis advisor) / Sulikowski, James (Committee member) / Zhao, Yunpeng (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Recovering high-quality DNA from thermally altered human remains poses a significant challenge for research and law enforcement agencies due to high levels of DNA degradation resulting from exposure to extremely high temperatures (e.g., fire). The current standard practice for the DNA identification of badly burned skeletal remains is to extract DNA from dense cortical bone collected from recovered skeletal elements. Some of the problems associated with this method are that it requires specialized equipment and training, is highly invasive (involving the physical destruction of sample material), time-consuming, and does not reliably guarantee the successful identification of the remains in question. At low-medium levels of thermal exposure, charred tissue is often adhered to these skeletal remains and typically discarded. In cases where burned/charred tissue is recoverable, it has the potential to be a more efficient alternative to the sampling of cortical bone. However, little has been done to test the viability of thermally altered soft tissue in terms of DNA identification to date. Burned/charred tissue was collected from skeletal samples provided by the University of Tennessee Forensic Anthropology Center, as a part of a controlled burn from donor individuals, for downstream laboratory processing and DNA analysis as part of the Stone Lab (Arizona State University, School of Human Evolution and Social Change). DNA from this charred tissue was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, and resulting yields were quantified via fluorometry using the Qubit Fluorometer 2.0 and Agilent TapeStation 4200 High-Sensitivity D5000 assay. It was found that between the temperatures of ~200-300 ℃ (burn category 2) and ~300-350 ℃ (burn category 3), tissue was the most efficient extraction type, especially from tissue taken from the surface of the ilium and the rib. As for bone, both the Dabney and the Loreille protocol performed similarly, so choice in extraction type comes down to personal preference, type of equipment on hand, and training. Although, for samples with low input material, the Dabney protocol is optimal.
ContributorsCoffman, Amber (Author) / Stone, Anne C (Thesis advisor) / Parker, Cody (Committee member) / Kanthaswamy, Sreetharan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023